THE INFLUENCE OF PROPORTIONAL AND PERCEPTUAL CONFLICT COMPOSITION ON TEAM PERFORMANCE

Past conflict research and theory has provided insight into the types of conflict and styles of conflict resolution in organizations and groups. A second generation of conflict research is now needed that recognizes that the type of conflict present in a group relative to the other types present (proportional conflict composition) and the amount of conflict perceived relative to the amount perceived by other members (perceptual conflict composition) may be critical to group functioning. Therefore, we propose two types of conflict composition in teams and investigate the links between proportional and perceptual conflict composition conflict, and team effectiveness (i.e., individual and team performance, commitment, cohesiveness, and member satisfaction) in two organizational samples. We find group conflict compositions consisting of high levels of task‐related conflict compared to relationship and process conflict (proportional task conflict) are high performing, satisfied teams. In addition, when team members disagree about amounts of conflict present (high perceptual conflict), we find evidence of negative group outcomes. Implications for managers and group members are discussed.

[1]  Theodore Kunin.  The Construction of a New Type of Attitude Measure , 1955 .

[2]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Interpersonal competence and organizational effectiveness , 1962 .

[3]  Kenneth E. Boulding,et al.  Conflict and Defense. , 1962 .

[4]  R. Walton,et al.  The Management of Interdepartmental Conflict: A Model and Review. , 1969 .

[5]  J. Hackman,et al.  Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey , 1975 .

[6]  R. A. Cosier,et al.  Cognitive conflict and goal conflict effects on task performance , 1977 .

[7]  G. Johns.  Difference score measures of organizational behavior variables: A critique. , 1981 .

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[9]  D. Burt.  Simulated Negotiations: An Experiment , 1982 .

[10]  J R Blau,et al.  Empowering nets of participation. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[11]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[12]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. , 1984 .

[13]  M. Maxwell,et al.  The synergy of sign and speech in simultaneous communication , 1985, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[14]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Separating individual and group effects , 1985 .

[15]  R. Howell.  Covariance Structure Modeling and Measurement Issues: A Note on “Interrelations among a Channel Entity's Power Sources” , 1987 .

[16]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[17]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[18]  Paula L. Rechner,et al.  Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making , 1989 .

[19]  Jennifer A. Chatman.  Improving Interactional Organizational Research: A Model of Person-Organization Fit , 1989 .

[20]  A. Tsui,et al.  Beyond Simple Demographic Effects: The Importance of Relational Demography in Superior-Subordinate Dyads , 1989 .

[21]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978-1988. , 1990 .

[22]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  Countering the effects of destructive criticism: The relative efficacy of four interventions. , 1990 .

[23]  M. Bazerman.  Judgment in Managerial Decision Making , 1990 .

[24]  Jennifer A. Chatman.  Matching People and Organizations: Selection and Socialization in Public Accounting Firms , 1989 .

[25]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  Positive effects of conflict: A cognitive perspective , 1991 .

[26]  B. Kabanoff.  Equity, Equality, Power, and Conflict , 1991 .

[27]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: A PROFILE COMPARISON APPROACH TO ASSESSING PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT , 1991 .

[28]  L. Weingart.  Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance , 1992 .

[29]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. , 1991 .

[30]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. , 1992 .

[31]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Do friends perform better than acquaintances? the interaction of friendship, conflict, and task , 1993 .

[32]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  RESOLVING THE PARADOX OF CONFLICT, STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE , 1994 .

[33]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Assessing the Relationship between Industry Characteristics and Organizational Culture: How Different can You Be? , 1994 .

[34]  K. Jehn.  ENHANCING EFFECTIVENESS: AN INVESTIGATION OF ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF VALUE‐BASED INTRAGROUP CONFLICT , 1994 .

[35]  J. Edwards.  The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative , 1994 .

[36]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[37]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance , 1996 .

[38]  Lisa Hope Pelled.  RELATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY AND PERCEPTIONS OF GROUP CONFLICT AND PERFORMANCE: A FIELD INVESTIGATION , 1996 .

[39]  L. H. Pelled.  Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[40]  Allen C. Amason.  Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[41]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  The Effects of Top Management Team Size and interaction Norms on Cognitive and Affective Conflict , 1997 .

[42]  K. Jehn.  A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[43]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Being Different Yet Feeling Similar: The Influence Of Demographic Composition And Organizational Culture On Work Processes And Outcomes , 1998 .

[44]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[45]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[46]  Onne Janssen,et al.  How Task and Person Conflict Shape the Role of Positive Interdependence in Management Teams , 1999 .

[47]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[48]  Gordon W. Cheung.  Multifaceted conceptions of self–other ratings disagreement. , 1999 .

[49]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Managerial personality and performance: A semi-idiographic approach. , 1999 .

[50]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[51]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[52]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  The Influence of Demographic Heterogeneity on the Emergence and Consequences of Cooperative Norms in Work Teams , 2001 .

[53]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  CONFLICT AND SHARED IDENTITY IN GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED TEAMS , 2001 .