What Does Ipsilateral Delay Activity Reflect? Inferences from Slow Potentials in a Lateralized Visual Working Memory Task

In the lateralized change detection task, two item arrays are presented, one on each side of the display. Participants have to remember the items in the relevant hemifield and ignore the items in the irrelevant hemifield. A difference wave between contralateral and ipsilateral slow potentials with respect to the relevant items, the contralateral delay activity, can be calculated. As its amplitude varies with the number of items held in working memory (WM) and reaches its asymptote with WM capacity, it is considered a pure neural correlate of visual WM load. However, in addition to this contralateral delay activity, load-dependent activity has also been observed over the hemisphere ipsilateral to the relevant hemifield, suggesting that the ipsilateral hemisphere is also involved in memory-related processes. This ipsilateral activity might either reflect a bilateral processing of relevant or else a lateralized processing of irrelevant, to-be-filtered-out items. As in the lateralized change detection task, the number of items on both sides of the display is typically identical, it was not possible to decide between these alternatives yet. To disentangle the influence of relevant and irrelevant items, we orthogonally varied the number of both types of items. Processing of relevant items caused purely contralateral load-dependent activity. Ipsilateral slow potentials were influenced by the number of irrelevant items only if visual WM load was low, but not if it was high. This suggests that whether irrelevant items are processed or filtered out depends on visual WM load.

[1]  E. Vogel,et al.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[2]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Bilateral parietal and contralateral responses during maintenance of unilaterally encoded objects in visual short-term memory: evidence from magnetoencephalography. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[3]  Paul M. Corballis,et al.  Hemispheric Organization of Visual Memories , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Edward Awh,et al.  A bilateral advantage for storage in visual working memory , 2010, Cognition.

[5]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[6]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  Successful training of filtering mechanisms in multiple object tracking does not transfer to filtering mechanisms in a visual working memory task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  D. Ruchkin,et al.  Working memory and preparation elicit different patterns of slow wave event-related brain potentials. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[8]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Nicolas Robitaille,et al.  Distinguishing between lateralized and nonlateralized brain activity associated with visual short-term memory: fMRI, MEG, and EEG evidence from the same observers , 2010, NeuroImage.

[10]  Eunsam Shin,et al.  Multiple Levels of Stimulus Representation in Visual Working Memory , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  E. Vogel,et al.  Human Variation in Overriding Attentional Capture , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Grafman,et al.  Distinctions and similarities among working memory processes: an event-related potential study. , 1992, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Fundamental properties of the N2pc as an index of spatial attention: effects of masking. , 2006, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[14]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Electrophysiological Measures of Maintaining Representations in Visual Working Memory , 2007, Cortex.

[15]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle. , 2009, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[17]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[18]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[19]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Event-related potentials reveal topographical and temporal distinct neuronal activation patterns for spatial and object working memory. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  E. Vogel,et al.  Contralateral delay activity provides a neural measure of the number of representations in visual working memory. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  M. Gazzaniga The cognitive neurosciences, 3rd edition , 2004 .

[23]  Mowei Shen,et al.  Does high memory load kick task-irrelevant information out of visual working memory? , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.

[27]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  H. Egeth,et al.  Failure of spatial selectivity in vision , 1978 .

[29]  H Hämäläinen,et al.  Visuospatial mnemonic load modulates event‐related slow potentials , 1997, Neuroreport.

[30]  C. Bundesen,et al.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. , 2005, Psychological review.

[31]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  An event-related brain potential correlate of visual short-term memory. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[32]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[33]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  Gains of item-specific training in visual working memory and their neural correlates , 2012, Brain Research.