Impact of multipath reflections on secrecy in VLC systems with randomly located eavesdroppers

Considering reflected light in physical layer security (PLS) is very important because a small portion of reflected light enables an eavesdropper (ED) to acquire legitimate information. Moreover, it would be a practical strategy for an ED to be located at an outer area of the room, where the reflection light is strong, in order to escape the vigilance of a legitimate user. Therefore, in this paper, we investigate the impact of multipath reflections on PLS in visible light communication in the presence of randomly located eavesdroppers. We apply spatial point processes to characterize randomly distributed EDs. The generalized error in signal-to-noise ratio that occurs when reflections are ignored is defined as a function of the distance between the receiver and the wall. We use this error for quantifying the domain of interest that needs to be considered from the secrecy viewpoint. Furthermore, we investigate how the reflection affects the secrecy outage probability (SOP). It is shown that the effect of the reflection on the SOP can be removed by adjusting the light emitting diode configuration. Monte Carlo simulations and numerical results are given to verify our analysis.

[1]  Joseph M. Kahn,et al.  Wireless Infrared Communications , 1994 .

[2]  Harald Haas,et al.  What is LiFi? , 2015, 2015 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[3]  Edward W. Knightly,et al.  The Spy Next Door: Eavesdropping on High Throughput Visible Light Communications , 2015, VLCS@MobiCom.

[4]  Hsiao-Hwa Chen,et al.  Physical Layer Security for Next Generation Wireless Networks: Theories, Technologies, and Challenges , 2017, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[5]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  On the Secrecy Capacity of MISO Visible Light Communication Channels , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[6]  Lutz H.-J. Lampe,et al.  Physical-Layer Security for MISO Visible Light Communication Channels , 2015, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  Lutz H.-J. Lampe,et al.  Securing visible light communications via friendly jamming , 2014, 2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[8]  Matthieu R. Bloch,et al.  Physical-Layer Security: From Information Theory to Security Engineering , 2011 .

[9]  Justin P. Coon,et al.  Secrecy analysis in visible light communication systems with randomly located eavesdroppers , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops).

[10]  Fredrik Tufvesson,et al.  5G: A Tutorial Overview of Standards, Trials, Challenges, Deployment, and Practice , 2017, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[11]  Masao Nakagawa,et al.  Fundamental analysis for visible-light communication system using LED lights , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[12]  Rajendran Parthiban,et al.  LED Based Indoor Visible Light Communications: State of the Art , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[13]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Improved achievable secrecy rate of visible light communication with cooperative jamming , 2015, 2015 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP).

[14]  Lutz H.-J. Lampe,et al.  Physical-layer security for indoor visible light communications , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[15]  Sebastian Randel,et al.  Advanced Modulation Schemes for Short-Range Optical Communications , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.