Source localization in complex networks using a frequency-domain approach

In this paper, we provide a novel frequency-domain approach to locate an arbitrary number of sources in a large number of zones. In typical source localization methods, the sources are assumed to be acoustic or RF; sensors are placed in different zones to listen to these sources where each zone-to-sensor has a unique path loss and delay. Since each zone has a path loss and delay to each sensor, the sensing matrix is full and the problem of source localization effectively reduces to a sparse signal recovery problem. On the contrary, we are interested in scenarios where the sources may not have an acoustic or RF signature, e.g., locating a vehicle with cameras or a rumor in a social network; and a very few sensors may be able to sense the sources due to obstacles/occlusions. In other words, instead of having a full sensing matrix (as in sparse recovery), the sensing matrix is now highly sparse. To this aim, we provide a protocol for the sensors to collaborate among each other and devise a frequency-domain approach to assist an interrogator to locate the source. In particular, an interrogator (e.g., a UAV) analyzes the Frequency-Response (FR) of the collaborated statistic at an arbitrary sensor, and moves to a neighboring sensor whose FR magnitude is the largest among all the neighbors. With carefully designed collaboration, we show that the FR magnitude at any sensor increases in the direction of the source. In order to locate multiple sources, we characterize the diversity in the sources to arrive at their successful identification.

[1]  Yatindra Nath Singh,et al.  Rumor Dynamics with Acceptability Factor and Inoculation of Nodes in Scale Free Networks , 2012, 2012 Eighth International Conference on Signal Image Technology and Internet Based Systems.

[2]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Source localization using recursively applied and projected (RAP) MUSIC , 1997 .

[3]  M. Viberg,et al.  Two decades of array signal processing research: the parametric approach , 1996, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[4]  Don H. Johnson,et al.  Array Signal Processing: Concepts and Techniques , 1993 .

[5]  Kung Yao,et al.  Source localization and beamforming , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[6]  Patrick Lailly,et al.  An Upgrade in Linearized Modeling of Wave Propagation , 2003 .

[7]  Ralph Otto Schmidt,et al.  A signal subspace approach to multiple emitter location and spectral estimation , 1981 .

[8]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse signal reconstruction from limited data using FOCUSS: a re-weighted minimum norm algorithm , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[9]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  Decentralized detection in sensor networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[10]  C. E. Siewert,et al.  The linearized Boltzmann equation: Sound-wave propagation in a rarefied gas , 2005 .

[11]  Dmitry M. Malioutov,et al.  A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  Richard M. Karp,et al.  Randomized rumor spreading , 2000, Proceedings 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[13]  R. O. Schmidt,et al.  Multiple emitter location and signal Parameter estimation , 1986 .

[14]  Gunilla Efraimsson,et al.  A frequency domain linearized Navier-Stokes equations approach to acoustic propagation in flow ducts with sharp edges. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Ιωαννησ Τσιτσικλησ,et al.  PROBLEMS IN DECENTRALIZED DECISION MAKING AND COMPUTATION , 1984 .