Aerodynamic Stall and Buffet Modeling for the Cessna Citation II Based on Flight Test Data

To meet the required flight simulator-based stall recovery training that will become mandatory for all aircarrier pilots in 2019, many flight simulators will need to be updated with accurate flightmodels at high anglesof- attack. Using a database of 69 symmetrical and quasi-steady recorded stalls performed with TU Delft’s Cessna Citation II laboratory aircraft, this paper aims to show to what extent relevant stall characteristics can still be modeled using flight test data from such “natural” stall flight test data (i.e., without additional flight test inputs). Formodeling the (low-frequency) changes to the aerodynamic characteristics, the well-known stall model structure based on Kirchoff’s flow separation theory is used. This aerodynamic stallmodel is augmented with a high-frequency stall buffet model identified based on power spectral density analysis of the flight test linear acceleration data. The stall model identification results obtained from a proposed methodology in which the aerodynamic and buffet model parameters were deliberately jointly estimated shows that the dynamic parameters capturing the stall hysteresis effect can indeed be estimated using quasi-steady stall maneuvers. Aerodynamic terms related to the pitch rate, however, are difficult to estimate for such quasi-steadymaneuvers, given the correlation between pitch rate and angle-of-attack. It was found that estimating stall transient effects (i.e., hysteresis time constants), which normally require highly dynamic flight test maneuvers, was found to be improved with with explicit use of the measured accelerations caused by the stall buffet in the identification methodology.

[1]  John N. Ralston,et al.  Evaluation of the NAWC/AD F/A-18 C/D simulation including database coverage and dynamic data implementation techniques , 1996 .

[2]  Eugene A. Morelli,et al.  Aircraft system identification : theory and practice , 2006 .

[3]  John N. Ralston,et al.  PC-based simulation of the F-16/MATV , 1997 .

[4]  Cornelis C. de Visser Global Nonlinear Model Identification with Multivariate Splines , 2011 .

[5]  Dennis A. Crider Accident Lessons for Stall Upset Recovery Training , 2010 .

[6]  Jeffery A. Schroeder,et al.  What Really Can Be Done in Simulation to Improve Upset Training , 2010 .

[7]  John V. Foster,et al.  Dynamics Modeling and Simulation of Large Transport Airplanes in Upset Conditions , 2005 .

[8]  Mikhail Goman,et al.  State-Space Representation of Aerodynamic Characteristics of an Aircraft at High Angles of Attack , 1994 .

[9]  Rudolph van der Merwe,et al.  The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control Symposium (Cat. No.00EX373).

[10]  Jeffery A. Schroeder,et al.  Global Implementation of Upset Prevention & Recovery Training , 2016 .

[11]  Detlef Rohlf,et al.  X-31A System Identification Using Single-Surface Excitation at High Angles of Attack. , 1996 .

[12]  M. Mulder,et al.  Comparing Multimodal Pilot Pitch Control Behavior Between Simulated and Real Flight P.M.T. Zaal, D.M. Pool, † , 2012 .

[14]  Peter R. Grant,et al.  Representative Post-Stall Modeling of T-tail Regional Jet and Turboprop Aircraft for Flight Training Simulator , 2015 .

[15]  Jeffery A. Schroeder,et al.  An Evaluation of Several Stall Models for Commercial Transport Training , 2014 .

[16]  S. Żak,et al.  Comparative study of non-linear state-observation techniques , 1987 .

[17]  M. Laban On-Line Aircraft Aerodynamic Model Identification , 1994 .

[18]  Joris Field,et al.  SUPRA - Enhanced upset recovery simulation , 2012 .

[19]  Joris Field,et al.  Upset Prevention and Recovery Training in Flight Simulators , 2011 .

[20]  Eugene A. Morelli,et al.  Global Aerodynamic Modeling for Stall/Upset Recovery Training Using Efficient Piloted Flight Test Techniques , 2013 .

[21]  Thomas F. Coleman,et al.  An Interior Trust Region Approach for Nonlinear Minimization Subject to Bounds , 1993, SIAM J. Optim..

[22]  Joaquim N. Dias Unsteady and Post-Stall Model Identification Using Dynamic Stall Maneuvers , 2015 .

[23]  Richard Newman,et al.  Airplane Upsets: Old Problem, New I ssues * , 2008 .

[24]  Jacob Kay,et al.  Development of Non-Linear, Low-Speed Aerodynamic Modelforthe F-16/Vista. , 1997 .

[25]  G. N. Malcolm Rotary-balance experiments on a modern fighter aircraft configuration at high Reynolds numbers , 1985 .

[26]  Jorge J. Moré,et al.  Computing a Trust Region Step , 1983 .

[27]  David R. Gingras,et al.  Flight Simulator Augmentation for Stall and Upset Training , 2014 .

[28]  D. Fischenberg,et al.  Identification of an Unsteady Aerodynamic Stall Model from Flight Test Data. , 1995 .

[29]  Luis A. Aguirre,et al.  Flight path reconstruction – A comparison of nonlinear Kalman filter and smoother algorithms , 2011 .

[30]  Hafid Smaili,et al.  Pushing Ahead - SUPRA Airplane Model for Upset Recovery , 2012 .

[31]  John V. Foster,et al.  Recent NASA Research on Aerodynamic Modeling of Post- Stall and Spin Dynamics of Large Transport Airplanes , 2007 .