Experimental and finite element analysis of the rat ulnar loading model-correlations between strain and bone formation following fatigue loading.

The rat forelimb compression model has been used widely to study bone response to mechanical loading. We used strain gages to assess load sharing between the ulna and radius in the forelimb of adult Fisher rats. We used histology and peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) to quantify ulnar bone formation 12 days after in vivo fatigue loading. Lastly, we developed a finite element model of the ulna to predict the pattern of surface strains during compression. Our findings indicate that at the mid-shaft the ulna carries 65% of the applied compressive force on the forelimb. We observed large variations in fatigue-induced bone formation over the circumference and length of the ulna. Bone formation was greatest 1-2 mm distal to the mid-shaft. At the mid-shaft, we observed woven bone formation that was greatest medially. Finite element analysis indicated a strain pattern consistent with a compression-bending loading mode, with the greatest strains occurring in compression on the medial surface and lesser tensile strains occurring laterally. A peak strain of -5190 microepsilon (for 13.3N forelimb compression) occurred 1-2 mm distal to the mid-shaft. The pattern of bone formation in the longitudinal direction was highly correlated to the predicted peak compressive axial strains at seven cross-sections (r2 = 0.89, p = 0.014). The in-plane pattern of bone formation was poorly correlated to the predicted magnitude of axial strain at 51 periosteal locations (r2 = 0.21, p < 0.001), because the least bone formation was observed where tensile strains were highest. These findings indicate that the magnitude of bone formation after fatigue loading is greatest in regions of high compressive strain.

[1]  D. Carter,et al.  Cyclic mechanical property degradation during fatigue loading of cortical bone. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  The interosseous membrane affects load distribution in the forearm. , 1997, The Journal of hand surgery.

[3]  K. Włodarski,et al.  Properties and origin of osteoblasts. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  C. Rubin,et al.  Strain Gradients Correlate with Sites of Periosteal Bone Formation , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  M.I.T. Press,et al.  The International Journal of Supercomputer Applications— , 1992 .

[6]  W. Ambrosius,et al.  Mechanical Loading of Diaphyseal Bone In Vivo: The Strain Threshold for an Osteogenic Response Varies with Location , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  L. E. Lanyon,et al.  Noninvasive loading of the rat ulna in vivo induces a strain-related modeling response uncomplicated by trauma or periostal pressure , 1994, Calcified Tissue International.

[8]  Toshio Yamamoto,et al.  Cellular origin of endochondral ossification from grafted periosteum , 2001, The Anatomical record.

[9]  K. Markolf,et al.  Mechanisms of load transfer in the cadaver forearm: role of the interosseous membrane. , 2000, The Journal of hand surgery.

[10]  L E Lanyon,et al.  Strain magnitude related changes in whole bone architecture in growing rats. , 1997, Bone.

[11]  Sundar Srinivasan,et al.  Noninvasive Loading of the Murine Tibia: An In Vivo Model for the Study of Mechanotransduction , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  Intracortical remodeling in adult rat long bones after fatigue loading. , 1998, Bone.

[13]  O. Verborgt,et al.  Loss of Osteocyte Integrity in Association with Microdamage and Bone Remodeling After Fatigue In Vivo , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  K. Markolf,et al.  The effects of partial and total interosseous membrane transection on load sharing in the cadaver forearm , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[15]  P Zioupos,et al.  Cumulative damage and the response of human bone in two-step loading fatigue. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  David B. Burr,et al.  Computational Methods for Bone Mechanics Studies , 1992, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[17]  P. Nasser,et al.  The Role of Interstitial Fluid Flow in the Remodeling Response to Fatigue Loading , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[18]  D. Davy,et al.  Machine vision photogrammetry: a technique for measurement of microstructural strain in cortical bone. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  G. Li,et al.  A minimally invasive method for the determination of force in the interosseous ligament. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[20]  Alexander G Robling,et al.  Improved Bone Structure and Strength After Long‐Term Mechanical Loading Is Greatest if Loading Is Separated Into Short Bouts , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[21]  L. Lanyon,et al.  Growth rate rather than gender determines the size of the adaptive response of the growing skeleton to mechanical strain. , 2002, Bone.

[22]  R. Brand,et al.  Effects of anisotropy and material axis registration on computed stress and strain distributions in the turkey ulna. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Matthew J Silva,et al.  In vivo fatigue loading of the rat ulna induces both bone formation and resorption and leads to time‐related changes in bone mechanical properties and density , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.