Behavioral significance of input-dependent plasticity of human somatosensory cortex

Training and learning induce powerful cortical reorganizational changes, which are referred to as use- or experience-dependent plasticity. Using MEG, we investigated how rapid reorganization of human somatosensory cortex induced by tactile stimulation leads to improved spatial discrimination performance. Plastic changes were induced by several hours of tactile co-activation in separated receptive fields on the right index finger. Subjects did not attend the stimulation but performed their daily work. We found a 20% decrease in spatial two-point discrimination thresholds paralleled by a dipole shift in medio-lateral direction along the central sulcus. We conclude that reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex induced by purely passive tactile co-activation is sufficient to improve tactile discrimination performance without training, attention or reinforcement.

[1]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Perceptual learning of spatial localization: specificity for orientation, position, and context. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Plasticity of the sensorimotor cortex representation of the reading finger in Braille readers. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  J. Liepert,et al.  Motor plasticity induced by synchronized thumb and foot movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  J. Edeline Learning-induced physiological plasticity in the thalamo-cortical sensory systems: a critical evaluation of receptive field plasticity, map changes and their potential mechanisms , 1999, Progress in Neurobiology.

[5]  D Sagi,et al.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  U. Eysel,et al.  Repetitive optical stimulation elicits fast receptive field changes in mature visual cortex , 1998, Neuroreport.

[7]  D. Buonomano,et al.  Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. , 1998, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  Phantom limb pain , 2001, The Lancet.

[9]  H R Dinse,et al.  Reversible relocation of representational boundaries of adult rats by intracortical microstimulation. , 1994, Neuroreport.

[10]  J. Liepert,et al.  Effects of passive tactile co‐activation on median ulnar nerve representation in human S1 , 2000, Neuroreport.

[11]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Alteration of digital representations in somatosensory cortex in focal hand dystonia , 1998, Neuroreport.

[12]  H. Dinse,et al.  Shifts in cortical representations predict human discrimination improvement , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Y. Dan,et al.  Temporal Specificity in the Cortical Plasticity of Visual Space Representation , 2002, Science.

[14]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Receptive fields in the body-surface map in adult cortex defined by temporally correlated inputs , 1988, Nature.

[15]  T. Elbert,et al.  Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation , 1995, Nature.

[16]  Y. Frégnac,et al.  A cellular analogue of visual cortical plasticity , 1988, Nature.

[17]  Hubert R. Dinse,et al.  Associative pairing of tactile stimulation induces somatosensory cortical reorganization in rats and humans , 1996, Neuroreport.

[18]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  SA1 and RA receptive fields, response variability, and population responses mapped with a probe array. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  S. Cruikshank,et al.  Evidence for the Hebbian hypothesis in experience-dependent physiological plasticity of neocortex: a critical review , 1996, Brain Research Reviews.

[20]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Increased Cortical Representation of the Fingers of the Left Hand in String Players , 1995, Science.

[21]  M. Fahle,et al.  No transfer of perceptual learning between similar stimuli in the same retinal position , 1996, Current Biology.

[22]  C Braun,et al.  Activity patterns of human somatosensory cortex adapt dynamically to stimulus properties , 2000, Neuroreport.

[23]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Activation of a distributed somatosensory cortical network in the human brain. A dipole modelling study of magnetic fields evoked by median nerve stimulation. Part I: Location and activation timing of SEF sources. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  B. Godde,et al.  Tactile Coactivation-Induced Changes in Spatial Discrimination Performance , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Remodelling of hand representation in adult cortex determined by timing of tactile stimulation , 1995, Nature.

[26]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Does use of a myoelectric prosthesis prevent cortical reorganization and phantom limb pain? , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.