A Study of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of the Scoliometer and Adam's Forward Bend Test

Study Design. Study of the diagnostic accuracy and interexaminer reliability of scoliosis diagnostic tests. Objectives. To estimate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the Scoliometer (National Scoliosis Foundation, Watertown, MA) and Adam's forward bend test in diagnosing scoliosis, and to determine the interexaminer reliability of the Scoliometer and Adam's forward bend test. Summary of Background Data. Exposure to diagnostic radiation in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis may result in a small but significant increase in cancer rates. The full‐spine radiographic examination remains the standard procedure for the assessment of scoliosis. There is a need for a valid and reliable noninvasive test to assess scoliosis. Methods. Two examiners independently assessed 105 patients presenting to a scoliosis clinic for trunk asymmetry with Adam's forward bend test and axial trunk rotation with the Scoliometer. The Cobb method served as the gold standard. Results. The interexaminer agreement for the Scoliometer is excellent in the thoracic spine and substantial in the lumbar spine. The interexaminer measurement error shows poor precision for thoracic and lumbar Scoliometer measurements. The interexaminer agreement for Adam's forward bend test is substantial in the thoracic spine and poor in the lumbar spine. Adam's forward bend test is more sensitive than the Scoliometer in detecting thoracic curves measuring 20° or more by the Cobb method. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggests that the use of the Scoliometer marginally improves the ability of diagnosing a scoliosis in the thoracic spine. Conclusions. The Scoliometer and Adam's forward bend tests have adequate interexaminer reliability for the assessment of thoracic curves. The Scoliometer has better interexaminer agreement in the lumbar spine. However, the Scoliometer has a high level of interexaminer measurement error that limits its use as an outcome instrument. Because Adam's forward bend test is more sensitive than the Scoliometer, the authors believe that it remains the best noninvasive clinical test to evaluate scoliosis.

[1]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  W. P. Bunnell.  An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  R. Shore,et al.  Risk of extrathyroid tumors following radiation treatment in infancy for thymic enlargement. , 1985, Radiation research.

[4]  M. Haas,et al.  Statistical methodology for reliability studies. , 1991, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[5]  E. C. Gregg,et al.  Risks of exposure to X-rays in patients undergoing long-term treatment for scoliosis. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  C. Orton,et al.  Radiation exposure to patients receiving routine scoliosis radiography measured at depth in an anthropomorphic phantom. , 1990, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[7]  D J Pearsall,et al.  Comparison of three noninvasive methods for measuring scoliosis. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[8]  H Labelle,et al.  Observer Variation in Assessing Spinal Curvature and Skeletal Development in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1988, Spine.

[9]  K. Lindahl-Kiessling,et al.  USE AND ABUSE OF ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY. , 1964, Lancet.

[10]  F. Harrell,et al.  Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography. Multivariable analysis. , 1984, The American journal of medicine.

[11]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[12]  G. D. Armstrong.  The intraclass correlation as a measure of interrater reliability of subjective judgments. , 1981, Nursing research.

[13]  L. Pickle,et al.  The logistic modeling of interobserver agreement. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[14]  J. Hanley,et al.  Projecting the lifetime risk of cancer from exposure to diagnostic ionizing radiation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 1994, Health physics.

[15]  G. Diamond.  Clinical epistemology of sensitivity and specificity. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  M. Haas.  The reliability of reliability. , 1991, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[17]  D H Nielsen,et al.  Validity and Reliability Testing of the Scoliometer , 1990 .

[18]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[19]  R. Burwell,et al.  SCHOOL SCREENING FOR SCOLIOSIS , 1981, The Lancet.

[20]  J. Boice,et al.  Breast cancer in women with scoliosis exposed to multiple diagnostic x rays. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies , 1983 .

[22]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[23]  R. Fitch,et al.  An Assessment of the Reliability of the Scoliometer , 1993, Spine.

[24]  D S Berman,et al.  A model for assessing the sensitivity and specificity of tests subject to selection bias. Application to exercise radionuclide ventriculography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.

[25]  J. M. Carlson,et al.  The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  R. Müller,et al.  A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.