Validation of a same-day real-time PCR method for screening of meat and carcass swabs for Salmonella

BackgroundOne of the major sources of human Salmonella infections is meat. Therefore, efficient and rapid monitoring of Salmonella in the meat production chain is necessary. Validation of alternative methods is needed to prove that the performance is equal to established methods. Very few of the published PCR methods for Salmonella have been validated in collaborative studies. This study describes a validation including comparative and collaborative trials, based on the recommendations from the Nordic organization for validation of alternative microbiological methods (NordVal) of a same-day, non-commercial real-time PCR method for detection of Salmonella in meat and carcass swabs.ResultsThe comparative trial was performed against a reference method (NMKL-71:5, 1999) using artificially and naturally contaminated samples (60 minced veal and pork meat samples, 60 poultry neck-skins, and 120 pig carcass swabs). The relative accuracy was 99%, relative detection level 100%, relative sensitivity 103% and relative specificity 100%. The collaborative trial included six laboratories testing minced meat, poultry neck-skins, and carcass swabs as un-inoculated samples and samples artificially contaminated with 1–10 CFU/25 g, and 10–100 CFU/25 g. Valid results were obtained from five of the laboratories and used for the statistical analysis. Apart from one of the non-inoculated samples being false positive with PCR for one of the laboratories, no false positive or false negative results were reported. Partly based on results obtained in this study, the method has obtained NordVal approval for analysis of Salmonella in meat and carcass swabs. The PCR method was transferred to a production laboratory and the performance was compared with the BAX Salmonella test on 39 pork samples artificially contaminated with Salmonella. There was no significant difference in the results obtained by the two methods.ConclusionThe real-time PCR method for detection of Salmonella in meat and carcass swabs was validated in comparative and collaborative trials according to NordVal recommendations. The PCR method was found to perform well. The test is currently being implemented for screening of several hundred thousand samples per year at a number of major Danish slaughterhouses to shorten the post-slaughter storage time and facilitate the swift export of fresh meat.

[1]  Burkhard Malorny,et al.  Comparison of PCR-ELISA and LightCycler real-time PCR assays for detecting Salmonella spp. in milk and meat samples. , 2004, Molecular and cellular probes.

[2]  R. Guy,et al.  A rapid molecular-based assay for direct quantification of viable bacteria in slaughterhouses. , 2006, Journal of food protection.

[3]  J. Hoorfar,et al.  Optimization of a 12-Hour TaqMan PCR-Based Method for Detection of Salmonella Bacteria in Meat , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[4]  J. Patel,et al.  Rapid detection of Salmonella from hydrodynamic pressure-treated poultry using molecular beacon real-time PCR. , 2006, Food microbiology.

[5]  P. Mrozinski,et al.  Evaluation of the BAX system for detection of Salmonella in selected foods: collaborative study. , 2003, Journal of AOAC International.

[6]  Reiner Helmuth,et al.  Diagnostic Real-Time PCR for Detection of Salmonella in Food , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[7]  East African Community,et al.  Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs — Carcass sampling for microbiological analysis , 2010 .

[8]  N. Jacobsen,et al.  Comparative, Collaborative, and On-Site Validation of a TaqMan PCR Method as a Tool for Certified Production of Fresh, Campylobacter-Free Chickens , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[9]  J. Hoorfar,et al.  Automated 5′ Nuclease PCR Assay for Identification of Salmonella enterica , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[10]  H. Burkardt,et al.  Standardization and Quality Control of PCR Analyses , 2000, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[11]  S. Qvist NordVal: A Nordic system for validation of alternative microbiological methods , 2007 .

[12]  J. Hoorfar,et al.  PCR technology and applications to zoonotic food-borne bacterial pathogens. , 2003, Methods in molecular biology.

[13]  B. Malorny,et al.  Multicenter validation study of two blockcycler- and one capillary-based real-time PCR methods for the detection of Salmonella in milk powder. , 2007, International journal of food microbiology.

[14]  D. Mossel,et al.  Impact on human health of Salmonella spp. on pork in The Netherlands and the anticipated effects of some currently proposed control strategies. , 1998, International journal of food microbiology.

[15]  K. Kam,et al.  Evaluation of two real‐time polymerase chain reaction pathogen detection kits for Salmonella spp. in food , 2004, Letters in applied microbiology.

[16]  E. Reynisson,et al.  Evaluation of probe chemistries and platforms to improve the detection limit of real-time PCR. , 2006, Journal of microbiological methods.

[17]  Tine Hald,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Quantify the Contribution of Animal‐Food Sources to Human Salmonellosis , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  R. Knutsson,et al.  Evaluation of selective enrichment PCR procedures for Yersinia enterocolitica. , 2002, International journal of food microbiology.