Effects of Dependence and Tasks on Unit Design and Efficiency

This paper explores the ramifications of external dependence for work-unit design and efficiency. Previous studies at the work-unit level have been largely concerned with task elements alone as the most important contingency for design. Two rival formulations of a dependence-contingent model are derived and contrasted with the more familiar task-contingent propositions. Tests using data from 230 employment security agency units show that, if task is controlled, both horizontal and vertical dependence are important predictors of more organic work-unit designs. In addition, failure to relate design to horizontal dependence is related to lower efficiency.

[1]  L. Argote.  Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[2]  C. S. Koberg,et al.  The Effects of Environmental Uncertainty and Dependence on Organizational Structure and Performance: A Comparative Study , 1987 .

[3]  Jack K. Ito,et al.  Effects of Task Difficulty and Interunit Interdependence on Information Processing Systems , 1986 .

[4]  J. Werbel,et al.  Universalistic and Contingency Predictions of Employee Satisfaction and Conflict. , 1979 .

[5]  B. C. Reimann.  On the Dimensions of Bureaucratic Structure: An Empirical Reappraisal , 1973 .

[6]  D. Pugh,et al.  The Context of Organization Structures , 1969 .

[7]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory. , 1984 .

[8]  M. Aiken,et al.  Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. , 1968 .

[9]  Christopher Graham Gresov.  Accounting for fit and misfit : a multiple-contingencies model of work-unit and performance , 1987 .

[10]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Framework For Organization Assessment , 1976 .

[11]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[12]  M. Tushman.  Work Characteristics and Subunit Communication Structure: A Contingency Analysis. , 1979 .

[13]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[14]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Technology, Structure, and Workgroup Effectiveness: A Test of a Contingency Model , 1984 .

[15]  J. Pennings.  Structural Contingency Theory: A Multivariate Test , 1987 .

[16]  Giorgio Inzerilli,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Empirical Research on Technology and Structure , 1979 .

[17]  C. Perrow.  A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[18]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[19]  Pradip N. Khandwalla,et al.  Viable and Effective Organizational Designs of Firms , 1973 .

[20]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[21]  J. Pennings,et al.  A Strategic Contingencies' Theory of Intraorganizational Power , 1971 .

[22]  J E McCann,et al.  An approach for assessing and managing inter-unit interdependence. , 1979, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[23]  Robert Drazin,et al.  Testing the Organizational Assessment Model of Work Unit Design: A Systems Approach. , 1985 .

[24]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Task Contingent Model of Work-Unit Structure. , 1974 .

[25]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[26]  C. B. Schoonhoven.  Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.". , 1981, Administrative science quarterly.

[27]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Measuring And Assessing Organizations , 1980 .