Effect of intraocular lens implantation on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and depth of focus

Purpose: To determine the role of spherical and irregular aberrations in the optics of the natural eye and after intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in terms of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and depth of focus. Setting: Laboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. Methods: Visual acuity and defocus‐specific contrast sensitivity in 11 pseudophakic patients (IOL group) and 27 age‐matched phakic subjects were compared. The results were obtained psychophysically. Spherical and irregular aberrations were subsequently estimated by comparing the measured myopic shift (optimum focus of contrast sensitivity at 4 cycles per degree [cpd] compared to that at 16 cpd) and depth of focus with those of theoretical eye models with varying amounts of irregular and spherical aberrations. Results: The best corrected visual acuity and best corrected contrast sensitivity in the IOL group did not significantly differ from that in the phakic group. The depth of focus was larger in the IOL group at a pupil diameter of 6.0 mm (P<.05). Comparison with theoretical eye models suggested a higher amount of spherical aberration in the IOL group; irregular aberration was almost the same in both groups. Conclusions: There was a higher amount of spherical aberration in the IOL group, related to a larger depth of focus, without loss of contrast sensitivity at optimum focus or loss of visual acuity. This might contribute to better quality of vision in pseudophakic subjects than in presbyopic phakic subjects.

[1]  R. Superstein,et al.  Functional complaints, visual acuity, spatial contrast sensitivity, and glare disability in preoperative and postoperative cataract patients. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[2]  D B Elliott,et al.  Evaluating visual function in cataract. , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[3]  M. Yap,et al.  CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN PSEUDOPHAKIA AND APHAKIA , 1986, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[4]  G E Legge,et al.  Tolerance to visual defocus. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  G. Bahr INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE SPHERICAL AND CHROMATIC ABERRATIONS OF THE EYE, AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON ITS REFRACTION , 1945 .

[6]  J F Bille,et al.  Preoperative simulation of outcomes using adaptive optics. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.

[7]  F. W. Campbell,et al.  Effect of Focus on the Visual Response to a Sinusoidally Modulated Spatial Stimulus , 1965 .

[8]  J. Goodman Introduction to Fourier optics , 1969 .

[9]  R. Hess,et al.  Vision through cataracts. , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  The effect of spherical and other aberrations upon the modulation transfer of the defocussed human eye , 1998, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[11]  G. van den Brink,et al.  Measurements of the geometrical aberrations of the eye , 1962 .

[12]  N Hirayama,et al.  Effect of chromatic aberration on contrast sensitivity in pseudophakic eyes. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[14]  W N Charman,et al.  Effect of refractive error in visual tests with sinusoidal gratings. , 1979, The British journal of physiological optics.

[15]  P Artal,et al.  Modulation transfer functions of eyes implanted with intraocular lenses. , 1993, Applied optics.

[16]  G. Rubin,et al.  Comparison of acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare before and after cataract surgery. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  N M Jansonius,et al.  Spherical and irregular aberrations are important for the optimal performance of the human eye , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[18]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  G B Arden,et al.  The importance of measuring contrast sensitivity in cases of visual disturbance. , 1978, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  Charman Wn Effect of refractive error in visual tests with sinusoidal gratings. , 1979 .

[21]  S. Norrby,et al.  Age‐related changes of defocus‐specific contrast sensitivity in healthy subjects , 2000, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[22]  R. Jenny,et al.  Fundamentals of Optics , 2001 .

[23]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Measurement of the stray light function of the eye in cataract and other optical disturbances by means of a direct compensation method , 1987 .

[24]  R. Woods,et al.  A comparison of visual performance between a rigid PMMA and a foldable acrylic intraocular lens , 1999, Eye.