Energy Cost Savings of Systems-Based Building Retrofits: A Study of Three Integrated Lighting Systems in Comparison with Component Based Retrofits

Author(s): Regnier, Cynthia; Mathew, Paul; Schwartz, Peter; Shackelford, Jordan; Robinson, Alastair; Walter, Travis | Abstract: Most building retrofit projects are still component-based in that they typically address only one piece or type of equipment at a time. Systems-based retrofits that seek to address multiple components in an integrated manner have the potential to provide significantly greater energy savings. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) partnered with several utilities to develop and evaluate three different integrated retrofit packages involving lighting systems: automated shading with daylight dimming controls, workstation-specific lighting with daylight controls, and task/ambient lighting with plug load occupancy controls. Specifically, our analysis sought to quantify the marginal benefits of these systems (energy savings as well as lighting performance and visual comfort) relative to component based approaches. The analysis was based on a combination of measured performance data from LBNL’s FLEXLAB® test facility and energy simulations. All three systems were compared to a simple fluorescent-to-LED retrofit, which represents the component-based approach. While the simple LED upgrade provides significant lighting energy savings of 63%, the systems yielded energy savings of 81-93%, which equates to additional savings of 49-82% over the simple LED upgrade (Table A-1).1 All systems tested provided satisfactory visual comfort as well, indicating good potential for market acceptance.

[1]  G. R. Newsham Manual Control of Window Blinds and Electric Lighting: Implications for Comfort and Energy Consumption , 1994 .

[2]  Mary Yamada,et al.  Adoption of Light-Emitting Diodes in Common Lighting Applications , 2013 .

[3]  Belinda L Collins,et al.  Window blinds as a potential energy saver: a case study. Building science series (final). [Effects of building orientation] , 1978 .

[4]  Gareth Monkman Greater than the sum of its parts , 2002 .

[5]  Robert Clear,et al.  A Post-Occupancy Monitored Evaluation of the Dimmable Lighting, Automated Shading, and Underfloor Air Distribution System in The New York Times Building , 2013 .

[6]  Kevin Van Den Wymelenberg,et al.  Patterns of occupant interaction with window blinds: A literature review , 2012 .

[7]  Athanasios Tzempelikos,et al.  Impact Of Shading Control And Thermostat Set Point Control In Perimeter Zones With Thermal Mass , 2013, Building Simulation Conference Proceedings.

[8]  Julio J. Valdés,et al.  Potential energy savings from high-resolution sensor controls for LED lighting , 2018 .

[9]  Eric Shen,et al.  Simulation-based assessment of the energy savings benefits of integrated control in office buildings , 2009 .

[10]  Lei Xu,et al.  Lighting energy efficiency in offices under different control strategies , 2017 .

[11]  Travis Walter,et al.  Beyond Widgets – Systems Incentive Programs for Utilities: , 2016 .

[12]  T. Inoue,et al.  The development of an optimal control system for window shading devices based on investigations in office buildings , 1988 .

[13]  I. Metzger,et al.  Plug-Load Control and Behavioral Change Research in GSA Office Buildings , 2012 .

[14]  Jordan Shackelford,et al.  Wireless Advanced Lighting Controls Retrofit Demonstration , 2015 .

[15]  Alastair Robinson Zone Level Occupant-Responsive Building Energy Systems at the GSA , 2014 .

[16]  Anca D. Galasiu,et al.  Energy Saving Lighting Control Systems for Open-Plan Offices: A Field Study , 2007 .

[17]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Control of wireless-networked lighting in open-plan offices , 2011 .

[18]  Mary Ann Piette,et al.  Quantifying the benefits of a building retrofit using an integrated system approach: A case study , 2018 .