An Education Program in Support of a Sustainable Future

The historical evolution and current status of sustainability education at Michigan Technological University is described. The history considers the last 15 years, during which, the faculty of Michigan Tech have been collaborating on the development of environmental curricula and courses. This development effort initially focused on specialized offerings for the environmental/chemical engineering programs. With time, recognition of the importance of environmental issues (wastes, natural resources, energy, etc.) to other disciplines across the campus grew. For example, chemists, biologists, foresters, etc. each have a role in characterizing the behavior of ecological systems. Engineering disciplines that are focused on the design of products, processes, or systems influence long term societal sustainability. Social scientists must understand the relationship/linkages between the environment, industry, citizens, and government. Greener products, environmentally responsible processes, life cycle thinking, and environmental stewardship need to become part of the modern lexicon of globally aware students. Faculty from diverse disciplines across the campus are now collaborating to develop courses and modify curricula to educate students with respect to the triple bottom line (i.e., sustainable economic, societal, and environmental future). Problems associated with the traditional education paradigm are discussed. A new education model aimed at training students to create a sustainable future is proposed.Copyright © 2003 by ASME

[1]  David R. Shonnard and,et al.  Comparative Environmental Assessments of VOC Recovery and Recycle Design Alternatives for a Gaseous Waste Stream , 2000 .

[2]  J. Schnoor.  Fate of pesticides and chemicals in the environment , 1992 .

[3]  Kirsten Sinclair Rosselot,et al.  Pollution prevention for chemical processes , 1996 .

[4]  D. Richards.  Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing , 1994 .

[5]  John W. Sutherland,et al.  Environmental Attributes of Manufacturing Processes , 2001 .

[6]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  A Handbook of Industrial Ecology , 2002 .

[7]  J. Mihelcic,et al.  Does simplifying transport and exposure yield reliable results? An analysis of four risk assessment methods. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  G. Carmichael,et al.  The aging process of naturally emitted aerosol (sea-salt and mineral aerosol) during long range transport , 1999 .

[9]  T. Graedel.  Industrial Ecology , 1995 .

[10]  B. Allenby.  Industrial ecology : policy framework and implementation , 1999 .

[11]  C K Patel,et al.  Industrial ecology. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Economic Input–Output Models for Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment , 1998 .

[13]  Bert Bras,et al.  Environmentally Benign manufacturing: Trends in Europe, Japan, and the USA , 2001 .

[14]  U. Diwekar,et al.  Process analysis approach to industrial ecology , 2002 .

[15]  David T. Allen,et al.  Green engineering: Environmentally conscious design of chemical processes and products , 2001 .