Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience

BackgroundRobotic colorectal surgery is gaining interest in general and colorectal surgery. The use of the da Vinci® Robotic system has been postulated to improve outcomes, primarily by increasing the dexterity and facility with which complex dissections can be performed. We report a large, single institution, comparative study of laparoscopic and robotic colectomies, attempting to better elucidate the benefits of robotic surgery in patients with colorectal disease.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 171 patients who underwent robotic and laparoscopic colectomies (79 and 92, respectively) at our institution between November 2004 and November 2009. Patients in both groups had well-matched preoperative parameters. All cases were further subdivided by their anatomical location into right-sided and left-sided colectomy, and analysis was performed within these two subgroups. Perioperative outcomes reported include operative time, operative blood loss, time to return of bowel function, time to discontinuation of patient controlled analgesia, length of stay, and intraoperative or postoperative complications.ResultsOur results indicate that there is no statistical difference in length of stay, time to return of bowel function, and time to discontinuation of patient-controlled analgesia between robotic and laparoscopic left and right colectomies. Interestingly, the total procedure time difference between the laparoscopic and robotic colectomies was much smaller than previously published accounts (mean 140 min vs. 135 min for right colectomy; mean 168 min vs. 203 min for left colectomy).ConclusionsOur study is one of the largest reviews of robotic colorectal surgery to date. We believe that our results further demonstrate the equivalence of robotic surgery to laparoscopic surgery in colorectal procedures. Future research should focus on surgeon-specific variables, such as comfort, ergonomics, distractibility, and ease of use, as other ways to potentially distinguish robotic from laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

[1]  Jaydeep H Palep,et al.  Robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery , 2009, Journal of Minimal Access Surgery.

[2]  J. Korndorffer,et al.  Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[3]  A. L. Rawlings,et al.  Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  R Berguer,et al.  An ergonomic evaluation of surgeons' axial skeletal and upper extremity movements during laparoscopic and open surgery. , 2001, American journal of surgery.

[5]  D. Dynda,et al.  Robotic‐assisted minimally invasive surgery; a useful tool in resident training—the Peoria experience, 2002–2009 , 2010, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[6]  G. Spinoglio,et al.  Robotic Colorectal Surgery: First 50 Cases Experience , 2008, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[7]  G. Denoto,et al.  A standardized technique for robotically performed sigmoid colectomy. , 2006, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[8]  C. Patel,et al.  Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[9]  A. L. Rawlings,et al.  Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive cases , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[10]  S. Marecik,et al.  Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: The Potential Advantage of Robotic Assistance , 2010, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[11]  D. Ravizza,et al.  Full Robotic Left Colon and Rectal Cancer Resection: Technique and Early Outcome , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[12]  Conor P. Delaney,et al.  Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery , 2003, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[13]  C. Patel,et al.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for recurrent diverticulitis: experience in consecutive cases and a review of the literature , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[14]  S. Marecik,et al.  Robotic Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Series of 131 Cases , 2010, World Journal of Surgery.

[15]  Paolo Trevisan,et al.  Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery for Treatment of Colorectal Diseases , 2004, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[16]  A. Park,et al.  Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[17]  M. Anvari,et al.  Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery , 2004, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[18]  C. Patel,et al.  A Three-Arm (Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Robotic) Matched-Case Analysis of Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery , 2011, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[19]  R. Mirnezami,et al.  Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery , 2010 .

[20]  M. Talamini,et al.  Robotic abdominal surgery. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[21]  S. Maeso,et al.  Efficacy of the Da Vinci Surgical System in Abdominal Surgery Compared With That of Laparoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[22]  K. Ng,et al.  Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal dissection: from better views to better outcome. , 2009, Singapore medical journal.

[23]  A. D’Annibale,et al.  Robotic Right Colon Resection: Evaluation of First 50 Consecutive Cases for Malignant Disease , 2012, Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[24]  S. Marecik,et al.  Robotic Assistance in Right Hemicolectomy: Is There a Role? , 2010, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[25]  Steven D. Wexner,et al.  The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.