Publication bias in gastroenterological research – a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting

[1]  T. Blum,et al.  Publication Rates Following Pancreas Meetings , 2001, Pancreas.

[2]  Jonathan A C Sterne,et al.  Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. , 2001, BMJ.

[3]  D. Provenzale,et al.  Factors associated with acceptance and full publication of GI endoscopic research originally published in abstract form. , 2001, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[4]  G K Kiroff,et al.  Publication bias in presentations o the Annual Scientific Congress , 2001, ANZ journal of surgery.

[5]  J. Sterne,et al.  Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  R. Sandler,et al.  Is there publication bias in the reporting of cancer risk in Barrett's esophagus? , 2000, Gastroenterology.

[7]  D. Sanders,et al.  Research outcomes in British gastroenterology: an audit of the subsequent full publication of abstracts presented at the British Society of Gastroenterology. , 2000, Gut.

[8]  P. Lee,et al.  Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  D. Altman,et al.  Inadequate reporting of controlled trials as short reports , 1998, The Lancet.

[10]  R. Wears,et al.  Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. , 1998, JAMA.

[11]  R. Wears,et al.  Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting: why investigators fail to publish. , 1998, JAMA.

[12]  R. Meals,et al.  Publication Patterns of Papers Presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  R. Meals,et al.  Publication pattern of papers presented at the American Society for Surgery of the Hand annual meeting. , 1996, The Journal of hand surgery.

[14]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. , 1995, Controlled clinical trials.

[15]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. , 1994 .

[16]  M. Cho,et al.  Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature. , 1994, JAMA.

[17]  M. Juzych,et al.  Whatever happened to abstracts from different sections of the association for research in vision and ophthalmology? , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  I. Tannock,et al.  The fate of abstracts submitted to a cancer meeting: factors which influence presentation and subsequent publication. , 1992, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  P. Easterbrook,et al.  Publication bias in clinical research , 1991, The Lancet.

[20]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[21]  B P Squires,et al.  Structured abstracts of original research and review articles. , 1990, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[22]  I. Chalmers,et al.  A cohort study of summary reports of controlled trials. , 1990, JAMA.

[23]  T. Chalmers,et al.  Minimizing the three stages of publication bias. , 1990, JAMA.

[24]  I Chalmers,et al.  Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. , 1990, JAMA.

[25]  K. Dickersin.  The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. , 1990, JAMA.

[26]  R. Panush,et al.  Profile of a meeting: how abstracts are written and reviewed. , 1989, The Journal of rheumatology.

[27]  C. Begg,et al.  Publication bias and dissemination of clinical research. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[28]  C. Begg,et al.  Publication bias : a problem in interpreting medical data , 1988 .

[29]  E. Christensen.  Multivariate survival analysis using Cox's regression model , 1987, Hepatology.

[30]  J. Holmes,et al.  Publication of research presented at the pediatric meetings. Change in selection. , 1985, American journal of diseases of children.

[31]  A. Relman.  News reports of medical meetings: how reliable are abstracts? , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  L. Goldman,et al.  Fate of cardiology research originally published in abstract form. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[34]  A. Soffer.  Beware the 200-word abstract! , 1976, Archives of internal medicine.

[35]  T. Chalmers,et al.  A Note on Fatality in Serum Hepatitis , 1965 .

[36]  C. Macarthur,et al.  Determinants of abstract acceptance for the Digestive Diseases Week--a cross sectional study. , 2001, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[37]  A Daluiski,et al.  Publication of abstracts submitted to the annual meeting of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. , 2000, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[38]  V. Landry.  The publication outcome for the papers presented at the 1990 ABA conference. , 1996, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[39]  K. Dickersin.  Confusion about "negative" studies. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  F. Gutzwiller,et al.  A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[41]  W H Weintraub,et al.  Are published manuscripts representative of the surgical meeting abstracts? An objective appraisal. , 1987, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[42]  R. Simes,et al.  Confronting publication bias: a cohort design for meta-analysis. , 1987, Statistics in medicine.