On the absolute calibration of SO 2 cameras

Abstract. Sulphur dioxide emission rate measurements are an important tool for volcanic monitoring and eruption risk assessment. The SO2 camera technique remotely measures volcanic emissions by analysing the ultraviolet absorption of SO2 in a narrow spectral window between 300 and 320 nm using solar radiation scattered in the atmosphere. The SO2 absorption is selectively detected by mounting band-pass interference filters in front of a two-dimensional, UV-sensitive CCD detector. One important step for correct SO2 emission rate measurements that can be compared with other measurement techniques is a correct calibration. This requires conversion from the measured optical density to the desired SO2 column density (CD). The conversion factor is most commonly determined by inserting quartz cells (cuvettes) with known amounts of SO2 into the light path. Another calibration method uses an additional narrow field-of-view Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy system (NFOV-DOAS), which measures the column density simultaneously in a small area of the camera's field-of-view. This procedure combines the very good spatial and temporal resolution of the SO2 camera technique with the more accurate column densities obtainable from DOAS measurements. This work investigates the uncertainty of results gained through the two commonly used, but quite different, calibration methods (DOAS and calibration cells). Measurements with three different instruments, an SO2 camera, a NFOV-DOAS system and an Imaging DOAS (I-DOAS), are presented. We compare the calibration-cell approach with the calibration from the NFOV-DOAS system. The respective results are compared with measurements from an I-DOAS to verify the calibration curve over the spatial extent of the image. The results show that calibration cells, while working fine in some cases, can lead to an overestimation of the SO2 CD by up to 60% compared with CDs from the DOAS measurements. Besides these errors of calibration, radiative transfer effects (e.g. light dilution, multiple scattering) can significantly influence the results of both instrument types. The measurements presented in this work were taken at Popocatepetl, Mexico, between 1 March 2011 and 4 March 2011. Average SO2 emission rates between 4.00 and 14.34 kg s−1 were observed.

[1]  A. McGonigle,et al.  Spectroscopic capture of 1 Hz volcanic SO2 fluxes and integration with volcano geophysical data , 2009 .

[2]  Vincent J. Realmuto,et al.  Development of an ultra-violet digital camera for volcanic SO2 imaging , 2007 .

[3]  Ulrich Platt,et al.  IDOAS: A new monitoring technique to study the 2D distribution of volcanic gas emissions , 2006 .

[4]  N. Bobrowski,et al.  The effects of volcanic eruptions on atmospheric chemistry , 2009 .

[5]  J. Phillips,et al.  Degassing processes during lava dome growth: Insights from Santiaguito lava dome, Guatemala , 2011 .

[6]  C. Oppenheimer,et al.  SO2 emissions from Soufrière Hills Volcano and their relationship to conduit permeability, hydrothermal interaction and degassing regime , 2003 .

[7]  J. Burrows,et al.  ATMOSPHERIC REMOTE-SENSING REFERENCE DATA FROM GOME — 2 . TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENT ABSORPTION CROSS SECTIONS OF O 3 IN THE 231 — 794 NM RANGE , 1998 .

[8]  Deliang Chen,et al.  The dual-beam mini-DOAS technique—measurements of volcanic gas emission, plume height and plume speed with a single instrument , 2009 .

[9]  Christoph Kern,et al.  Improving the accuracy of SO2column densities and emission rates obtained from upward‐looking UV‐spectroscopic measurements of volcanic plumes by taking realistic radiative transfer into account , 2012 .

[10]  U. Platt,et al.  Early in-flight detection of SO 2 via Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy: a feasible aviation safety measure to prevent potential encounters with volcanic plumes , 2010 .

[11]  Anders Ångström,et al.  On the Atmospheric Transmission of Sun Radiation and on Dust in the Air , 1929 .

[12]  Christoph Kern,et al.  Theoretical description of functionality, applications, and limitations of SO 2 cameras for the remote sensing of volcanic plumes , 2010 .

[13]  C. Oppenheimer,et al.  Depletion rates of sulfur dioxide in tropospheric volcanic plumes , 1998 .

[14]  C. Oppenheimer,et al.  Accurate measurement of volcanic SO2 flux: Determination of plume transport speed and integrated SO2 concentration with a single device , 2005 .

[15]  U. Platt,et al.  Imaging DOAS for volcanological applications , 2009 .

[16]  Stefan Kraus,et al.  DOASIS: a framework design for DOAS , 2006 .

[17]  Ulrich Platt,et al.  Differential optical absorption spectroscopy , 2008 .

[18]  Christoph Kern,et al.  Radiative transfer corrections for accurate spectroscopic measurements of volcanic gas emissions , 2010 .

[19]  J. Grainger,et al.  Anomalous Fraunhofer Line Profiles , 1962, Nature.

[20]  Ann Carine Vandaele,et al.  Fourier transform measurements of SO 2 absorption cross sections: II. , 2009 .

[21]  U. Platt,et al.  Ground-based imaging differential optical absorption spectroscopy of atmospheric gases. , 2004, Applied optics.

[22]  I. Watson,et al.  Multiparameter quantification of gas release during weak Strombolian eruptions at Pacaya Volcano, Guatemala , 2010 .

[23]  Johannes Orphal,et al.  ATMOSPHERIC REMOTE-SENSING REFERENCE DATA FROM GOME: PART 1. TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENT ABSORPTION CROSS-SECTIONS OF NO2 IN THE 231–794 nm RANGE , 1998 .

[24]  Cynthia Werner,et al.  Assessment of the UV camera sulfur dioxide retrieval for point source plumes , 2009 .

[25]  Robert G. Bryant,et al.  Protocols for UV camera volcanic SO2 measurements , 2010 .

[26]  José Luis Palma,et al.  Linking volcanic tremor, degassing, and eruption dynamics via SO2 imaging , 2011 .

[27]  M. F. Buongiorno,et al.  Volcanic aerosol optical characteristics of Mt. Etna tropospheric plume retrieved by means of airborne multispectral images , 2007 .

[28]  M M Millan,et al.  The applications of optical correlation techniques to the remote sensing of SO 2 plumes using sky light. , 1971, Atmospheric environment.

[29]  Christoph Kern,et al.  Network for Observation of Volcanic and Atmospheric Change (NOVAC)—A global network for volcanic gas monitoring: Network layout and instrument description , 2010 .

[30]  Mike Burton,et al.  Quantification of the gas mass emitted during single explosions on Stromboli with the SO2 imaging camera , 2009 .

[31]  A. Ångström,et al.  Techniques of Determinig the Turbidity of the Atmosphere , 1961 .

[32]  C. Oppenheimer,et al.  High temporal resolution SO2 flux measurements at Erebus volcano, Antarctica , 2010 .

[33]  Mike Burton,et al.  The SO2 camera: A simple, fast and cheap method for ground‐based imaging of SO2 in volcanic plumes , 2006 .