Analyzing requirements on software tools according to the functional engineering phase in the technical systems engineering process

The capability to shorten the process of engineering technical systems, from the mission to build the system to the final commissioning of the system, has become a critical factor for company success. This engineering process has become a time and money consuming part of the overall life cycle of a technical system. Common approaches for tackling this problem are the improvement of functions of isolated tools and the improvement/provision of the interoperability between tools. However, there is only little information on needs and preferences of domain experts. In this paper we report on a questionnaire-based survey to elicit the needs and preferences of domain experts. We analyze the answers of 88 domain experts from different disciplines with a variety of backgrounds on the importance of tool functionalities during functional engineering and discuss improvement aspects of three major functionalities rated as most important: version management, data exchange, and consistency checking.

[1]  Elisabet Estévez-Estévez,et al.  PLCopen for achieving interoperability between development phases , 2010, 2010 IEEE 15th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA 2010).

[2]  Stefan Biffl,et al.  Anforderungsanalyse für das integrierte Engineering , 2012 .

[3]  Thomas Wagner,et al.  Manufacturing system engineering with mechatronical units , 2010, 2010 IEEE 15th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA 2010).

[4]  U. Lindemann Methodische Entwicklung technischer Produkte , 2009 .

[5]  Arndt Luder,et al.  Flexibility and Re-configurability in Manufacturing by Means of Distributed Automation Systems – an Overview , 2010 .

[6]  Stefan Biffl,et al.  Integration of heterogeneous engineering environments for the automation systems lifecycle , 2009, 2009 7th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics.

[7]  Integriertes Engineering mit Automation Service Bus , 2012 .

[8]  Richard Mordinyi,et al.  Extending mechatronic objects for automation systems engineering in heterogeneous engineering environments , 2012, Proceedings of 2012 IEEE 17th International Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA 2012).

[9]  Stefan Biffl,et al.  Risk Assessment in Multi-disciplinary (Software+) Engineering Projects , 2011, Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng..

[10]  Matthias Foehr,et al.  Aggregation of engineering processes regarding the mechatronic approach , 2011, ETFA2011.

[11]  Arndt Lüder,et al.  Development of a method for the implementation of interoperable tool chains applying mechatronical thinking — Use case engineering of logic control , 2012, Proceedings of 2012 IEEE 17th International Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA 2012).

[12]  Stefan Biffl,et al.  Semantic Integration of Software and Systems Engineering Environments , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[13]  Stefan Biffl,et al.  Engineering project management using the Engineering Cockpit: A collaboration platform for project managers and engineers , 2011, 2011 9th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics.

[14]  Rainer Draht,et al.  Datenaustausch in der Anlagenplanung mit AutomationML , 2010 .

[15]  Alexander Alonso Dipl.-Ing. Garcia,et al.  Steuerungstechnische Standards als Fundament für die Leittechnik , 2008 .

[16]  Gabriele Köhler,et al.  Methodik und Problematik einer mehrstufigen Expertenbefragung , 1992 .

[17]  Hermann Kuehnle,et al.  Post mass production paradigm (PMPP) trajectories , 2007 .

[18]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Ontology-Based Integration of Information - A Survey of Existing Approaches , 2001, OIS@IJCAI.