Prediction of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Slug Flow Characteristics in Vertical Small Diameter Pipes by a One-Dimensional Two-Fluids Model

The purpose of this study is to improve a two-fluid model applicable to gas-liquid two-phase slug flows in small diameter pipes. Experimental data on void fraction and frictional pressure drop were obtained for vertical upward slug flow in 5 and 9 mm i.d. circular pipes, and those on the interfacial friction force were obtained by substituting the above data into an equation derived from the one-dimensional two-fluids model. The test liquids were a Poly-oxy-ethylene lauryl ether water solution, a 72 wt% glycerin water solution and a tap water at 30 °C, while the test gas was air at near atmospheric pressure. In order to study the effects of liquid properties, surface tension of the test liquids against air was varied from 0.042 to 0.071 N/m, viscosity was 0.797 to 19.6 mPa·s, and density was 996 to 1184 kg/m3. The range of volumetric flux of the liquid was 0.1 to 2.0 m/s, and that of the gas was 0.1 to 22 m/s. In addition, the drag coefficient data of the large bubble was determined from the data on the bubble diameter, the respective void fractions of the liquid slug section and the large bubble one, the interfacial friction force and the length ratio of the large bubble to the total of the liquid slug and the large bubble. These data were used to validate representative two-fluid model codes. Since the prediction by the codes did not fit well the present data, a new drag coefficient correlation for the large bubble was proposed using 5 dimensionless parameters. The predictions by the new correlation and familiar ones in literatures have been tested against the present data, and the applicability of the new one has been demonstrated.

[1]  P. Spedding,et al.  The effect of surface tension on flow pattern, holdup and pressure drop during horizontal air—water pipe flow at atmospheric conditions , 1992 .

[2]  George D. Raithby,et al.  A transient two-fluid model for the simulation of slug flow in pipelines—I. Theory , 1995 .

[3]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Local drag laws in dispersed two-phase flow , 1979 .

[4]  A. Kawahara,et al.  Effects of Surface Tension on Flow Characteristics of Two-Phase Annular Flow in Vertical Small Diameter Pipes , 2006 .

[5]  Chi-Chuan Wang,et al.  Two-Phase Flow Resistance of Refrigerants R-22, R-410A and R-407C in Small Diameter Tubes , 2001 .

[6]  John R. Thome,et al.  Flow boiling heat transfer of R134a, R236fa and R245fa in a horizontal 1.030 mm circular channel , 2009 .

[7]  A. Kawahara,et al.  Study of Interfacial Friction Force for Bubble Flows in a 2×1 Rod Channel Simplifying BWR , 2011 .

[8]  K. Yan,et al.  A coupled model for simulation of the gas–liquid two-phase flow with complex flow patterns , 2010 .

[9]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Two-group interfacial area transport in vertical air–water flow: I. Mechanistic model , 2003 .

[10]  Wei Li,et al.  A general correlation for adiabatic two-phase pressure drop in micro/mini-channels , 2010 .

[11]  H. Yoshida,et al.  Thermal-Hydraulic Estimation in Tight-Lattice Rod Bundles for Development of the Innovative Water Reactor for Flexible Fuel Cycle , 2008 .

[12]  Ty A. Newell,et al.  Prediction of refrigerant void fraction in horizontal tubes using probabilistic flow regime maps , 2008 .

[13]  Stephen M. Bajorek,et al.  Assessment of TRACE Code Using Rod Bundle Heat Transfer Mixture Level-Swell Tests , 2006 .