The impact of 14nm photomask variability and uncertainty on computational lithography solutions
暂无分享,去创建一个
John L. Sturtevant | Edita Tejnil | Kent H. Nakagawa | Peter Buck | Guoxiang Ning | Paul Ackmann | Franklin D. Kalk | Fritz Gans | Christian Buergel | Steffen Schulze
[1] Konstantinos Adam,et al. Understanding the impact of rigorous mask effects in the presence of empirical process models used in optical proximity correction (OPC) , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[2] Sunwook Jung,et al. Application of mask process correction (MPC) to monitor and correct mask process drift , 2011, Advanced Lithography.
[3] John L. Sturtevant,et al. Theoretical and experimental optimization of numerical aperture and partial coherence for complementary phase-shift processes , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[4] Ming-Chuan Yang. Analytical optimization of high-transmission attenuated phase-shifting reticles , 2009 .
[5] Steffen Schulze,et al. Model based mask process correction and verification for advanced process nodes , 2009, Advanced Lithography.
[6] John L. Sturtevant,et al. Roadmap to sub-nanometer OPC model accuracy , 2012, Other Conferences.
[7] David Fryer,et al. Accurate 3DEMF mask model for full-chip simulation , 2013, Advanced Lithography.
[8] A. Neureuther,et al. Domain decomposition methods for the rapid electromagnetic simulation of photomask scattering , 2002 .
[9] Wenzhan Zhou,et al. OMOG mask topography effect on lithography modeling of 32nm contact hole patterning , 2010, Advanced Lithography.
[10] John L. Sturtevant. Challenges for patterning process models applied to large scale , 2012 .