A statistical study of aggregate testing data with respect to engineering judgement

Abstract Aspects of product-testing and measurement uncertainty are addressed with the intention of providing guidelines to enable engineering judgements to be made which are based on valid scientific criteria. Suggestions are made to enable improved estimates of: (1) the critical range when defining measurement uncertainty; (2) the number of tests required to ensure, with a stated probability, that there is a 95% probability that the estimated mean lies within a stated absolute amount of the underlying population mean; (3) confidence intervals for a single determination; (4) confidence intervals on observed abundance in point- or grain-counts, including an exact upper bound on the proportion of a constituent which could be present (e.g. opal or chert as a contaminant) when no occurrences have been observed; (5) confidence interval on the proportion of sub-standard product present in a source of bulk material, on the basis of routine testing of a continuously delivered product, J-charts for the mean and range are also introduced as an aid to quality assurance. These have excellent performance compared to the better-known Shewhart and cusum charts and are well-suited to manual implementation at a ‘shop-floor’ level.

[1]  Robert E. Machol,et al.  Confidence intervals based on one or more observations , 1987, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[2]  R. Timothy Patterson,et al.  Re-examination of the statistical methods used to determine the number of point counts needed for micropaleontological quantitative research , 1989, Journal of Paleontology.

[3]  C. Blyth,et al.  Binomial Confidence Intervals , 1983 .

[4]  Lawrence L. Kupper,et al.  How Appropriate are Popular Sample Size Formulas , 1989 .

[5]  J. Mandel.  The validation of measurement through interlaboratory studies , 1991 .

[6]  L Collis,et al.  Aggregates: Sand, gravel and crushed rock aggregates for construction purposes , 1985 .

[7]  A. Tobi,et al.  A chart for judging the reliability of point counting results , 1965 .

[8]  Yoritake Fujino,et al.  Approximate binomial confidence limits , 1980 .

[9]  F. Chayes.  Petrographic analysis by fragment counting; Part 1, The counting error , 1944 .

[10]  Steven H. Gebler.  Interpretation of Quality-Control Charts for Concrete Production , 1990 .

[11]  Richard J. Howarth,et al.  Quality control charting for the analytical laboratory: Part 1. Univariate methods. A review. , 1995 .

[12]  H. C. Erntroy.  The variation of works test cubes , 1960 .

[13]  Steven K. Thompson,et al.  Sample Size for Estimating Multinomial Proportions , 1987 .

[14]  H. Papageorgiou.  Characterizations of Some Discrete Distribution Models Arising in Pollen Studies , 1985 .

[15]  Adrian Stickley,et al.  The nature of quality assurance and statistical methods in BS 5750 , 1994 .

[16]  W. R. Bergstrom,et al.  Statistical Evaluation of the In-PlaceCompressive Strength of Concrete , 1985 .

[17]  J Bruce Tait.  Concrete Quality Assurance BasedStrength Tests , 1981 .

[18]  Paul I. Feder.  Glossary and Tables for Statistical Quality Control , 1984 .

[19]  J Dewar.  Manual of Ready-Mixed Concrete , 1992 .

[20]  Harald Haas.  A CONTRIBUTION TO THE APPLICATION OF STATISTICAL QUALITY CONTROL IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY , 1977 .

[21]  M. Buzas.  Another look at confidence limits for species proportions , 1988, Journal of Paleontology.

[22]  C Eisenhart,et al.  Expression of the Uncertainties of Final Results: Clear statements of the uncertainties of reported values are needed for their critical evaluation. , 1968, Science.

[23]  S. M. Sultan.  Spectrophotometric determination of tetracycline with sodium molybdate. , 1986, The Analyst.

[24]  R. E. Machol,et al.  Confidence interval based on single observation , 1966 .

[25]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Glossary and Tables for Statistical Quality Control , 1997 .

[26]  Luis A. Escobar,et al.  Statistical Intervals: A Guide for Practitioners , 1991 .

[27]  A. L. Dryden.  Accuracy in Percentage Representation of Heavy Mineral Frequencies. , 1931, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.