When word identification fails: ERP correlates of recognition without identification and of word identification failure

Recognition without identification (RWI) refers to people's ability to discriminate studied from unstudied items when the items themselves fail to be identified, as when people fail to identify words from fragments. We sought to identify the ERP correlates of word fragment RWI in an effort to better understand its underlying mechanisms; in so doing, we also examined the ERP correlates of word identification failure vs. success. We found the ERP correlate of the RWI effect to be the N300; greater negativity was shown for unidentified fragments of studied words than for unidentified fragments of unstudied words between 300-325 ms post test fragment onset. We further separated the ERPs according to whether subjects showed the behavioral RWI effect or not; the N300 effect emerged only among those subjects who showed the behavioral effect, suggesting that the N300 is related to the behavioral effect itself. With regard to the ERP correlates of word identification failure vs. success, we found very early indicators of later word identification success vs. failure (starting at 125 ms) that were independent of priming. These early effects may be preconscious markers of downstream word identification success vs. failure. We also found a later persistent negativity associated with successfully identified words that we propose to be associated with executive function and possibly the successful suppression of irrelevant words that might initially come to mind when attempting to complete a unique word fragment; word fragment identification failure may sometimes be due to a failure to suppress irrelevant or incorrect words.

[1]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  Knowing we know before we know: ERP correlates of initial feeling-of-knowing , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[3]  A. Cleary,et al.  Recognition without face identification , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Moses M. Langley,et al.  Recognition without picture identification: Geons as components of the pictorial memory trace , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Jason S. Nomi,et al.  Odor recognition without identification , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[6]  S. Luck An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .

[7]  E. Vogel,et al.  Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink , 1996, Nature.

[8]  Anne M Cleary,et al.  Recognition with and without identification: Dissociative effects of meaningful encoding , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[9]  M. Brass,et al.  Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  A. Cleary,et al.  Recognition without identification. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  J. Halberstadt,et al.  Why Barack Obama Is Black , 2011, Psychological science.

[12]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  FN400 potentials are functionally identical to N400 potentials and reflect semantic processing during recognition testing. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[13]  Qinglin Zhang,et al.  Brain mechanisms underlying visual perception and visual mental imagery of Chinese pseudo-characters: An event-related potential study , 2007, Brain Research.

[14]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[15]  Anne M Cleary,et al.  True and false memory in the absence of perceptual identification , 2004, Memory.

[16]  Enoch Callaway,et al.  The effect of attentional effort on visual evoked potential N1 latency , 1982, Psychiatry Research.

[17]  B. Libet,et al.  Cortical Representation of Evoked Potentials Relative to Conscious Sensory Responses, and of Somatosensory Qualities - in Man , 1993 .

[18]  Marie T Banich,et al.  Neural inhibition enables selection during language processing , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Pierre-Jean Marescaux,et al.  Metacognition : process, function and use , 2002 .

[20]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  Inhibiting Your Native Language , 2007, Psychological science.

[21]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  An event-related potential study of word-stem cued recall. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  A. Cleary,et al.  Recognition without Perceptual Identification: A Measure of Familiarity? , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[23]  Todd C. Handy,et al.  Event-related potentials : a methods handbook , 2005 .

[24]  Z. Peynircioǧlu A feeling-of-recognition without identification☆ , 1990 .

[25]  Tim Curran,et al.  Picture Superiority Doubly Dissociates the ERP Correlates of Recollection and Familiarity , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  An Electrophysiological Signature of Unconscious Recognition Memory , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Brice A. Kuhl,et al.  Strategic Control of Memory , 2009 .

[29]  M I Posner,et al.  Time Course of Cortical Activations in Implicit and Explicit Recall , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  T. Curran,et al.  Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[31]  Qinglin Zhang,et al.  Brain mechanism of Stroop interference effect in Chinese characters , 2006, Brain Research.

[32]  Gregor Leicht,et al.  Evidence for a close relationship between conscious effort and anterior cingulate cortex activity. , 2005, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[33]  A. Cleary,et al.  Memory for unidentified items: Evidence for the use of letter information in familiarity processes , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[34]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  Metacognition in Strategy Selection , 2002 .

[35]  Bogdan Kostic,et al.  Song recognition without identification: when people cannot "name that tune" but can recognize it as familiar. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[36]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  The Unconscious Feeling of Knowing: A Commentary on Koriat's Paper , 2000, Consciousness and Cognition.

[37]  G. Mangun,et al.  Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing. , 1995, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[38]  B. Libet,et al.  Somatosensory System , 1973, Handbook of Sensory Physiology.

[39]  I Rosén,et al.  Semantic processing without conscious identification: evidence from event-related potentials. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  G. Woodman,et al.  Event-related potential studies of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  T. Curran Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[42]  D. Margoliash Behavioural biology: Name that tune , 2004, Nature.

[43]  T. Curran,et al.  Event-related potential (ERP) correlates of memory blocking and priming during a word fragment test. , 2010, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[44]  Larry R Squire,et al.  Medial temporal lobe activity can distinguish between old and new stimuli independently of overt behavioral choice , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Anthony J Ryals,et al.  The recognition without cued recall phenomenon: Support for a feature-matching theory over a partial recollection account☆ , 2012 .

[46]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  Orthography, phonology, and meaning: Word features that give rise to feelings of familiarity in recognition , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  A. Cleary,et al.  Scene recognition without identification. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[49]  A. Cleary,et al.  Auditory recognition without identification , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[50]  Z. Ye,et al.  Involvement of cognitive control in sentence comprehension: Evidence from ERPs , 2008, Brain Research.

[51]  Michael J. Watkins,et al.  A pool of 1,086 words with unique two-letter fragments , 1988 .

[52]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  A comparison of the electrophysiological effects of formal and repetition priming. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[53]  Tim Curran,et al.  The FN400 indexes familiarity-based recognition of faces , 2007, NeuroImage.