This paper draws a remarkably simple bridge between auction theory and incentive theory. It considers the auctioning of an indivisible project among several fi rms. The firms have private information about their future cost at th e bidding stage, and the selected firm ex post invests in cost reduct ion. The authors show that (1) the optimal auction can be implemented by a dominant strategy auction that uses information about both the first bid and the second bid; (2) the winner faces a (linear) incenti ve contract; (3) the fixed transfer to the winner decreases with his announced expected cost and increases with the second lowest announce d expected cost; and (4) the share of cost overruns borne by the winn er decreases with the winner's announced expected cost. Copyright 1987 by University of Chicago Press.
[1]
H. Demsetz,et al.
Why Regulate Utilities
,
1968
.
[2]
Oliver E. Williamson,et al.
Franchise Bidding for Natural Monopolies -- in General and with Respect to CATV
,
1976
.
[3]
Jean-Jacques Laffont,et al.
A complete solution to a class of principal-agent problems with an application to the control of a self-managed firm
,
1984
.
[4]
David P. Baron,et al.
Monitoring, moral hazard, asymmetric information, and risk sharing in procurement contracting
,
1987
.
[5]
J. Laffont,et al.
Using Cost Observation to Regulate Firms
,
1986,
Journal of Political Economy.
[6]
R. Preston McAfee,et al.
Bidding for contracts: a principal-agent analysis
,
1986
.