Comparing the ‘phrasicon’ of teenagers in immersive and non-immersive settings

Foreign language learners’ phraseological proficiency remains problematic, even at advanced levels (e.g., Meunier, 2012; Meunier & Granger, 2008; Siepmann, 2008). While the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) method is believed to facilitate foreign language learning by fostering input, interaction, and output, little attention has been paid to the phraseological competence of CLIL learners. The present study aims to fill this gap as it is framed within an interdisciplinary project on CLIL in Belgium and specifically focuses on the phrasicon, i.e. the phraseological lexicon, of 5th year French-speaking secondary school learners of English in immersive (CLIL) and non-immersive (NON-CLIL) settings. The paper reports on (1) an analysis of the variety/range of the phrasicon and (2) an overview of phraseological accuracy. The analyses are based on a corpus of written productions of 180 learners. The findings of this study indicate higher frequency, range and accuracy in the phrasicon of CLIL learners.

[1]  Kathy Conklin,et al.  The Processing of Formulaic Language , 2012, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[2]  N. Ellis.  REFLECTIONS ON FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[3]  Sylviane Granger,et al.  Learner English on Computer , 1998 .

[4]  Carl James,et al.  Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis , 1998 .

[5]  Sylviane Granger,et al.  Formulaic Language in Learner Corpora , 2012, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[6]  David Lasagabaster,et al.  Foreign Language Competence in Content and Language Integrated Courses , 2008 .

[7]  Stefan Th. Gries,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research: Statistics for learner corpus research , 2015 .

[8]  N. Ellis,et al.  Implicit and explicit learning of languages , 1997 .

[9]  M. Swain.  Three functions of output in second language learning , 1995 .

[10]  Dilin Liu,et al.  Linking adverbials: an across-register corpus study and its implications , 2008 .

[11]  David Lasagabaster,et al.  Immersion and CLIL in English: more differences than similarities , 2010 .

[12]  Victor Kuperman,et al.  Moving spaces: Spelling alternation in English noun-noun compounds , 2013 .

[13]  B. Erman,et al.  The idiom principle and the open choice principle , 2000 .

[14]  A. Wray.  What Do We (Think We) Know About Formulaic Language? An Evaluation of the Current State of Play , 2012, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[15]  Phoebe M.S. Lin.  Investigating the validity of internet television as a resource for acquiring L2 formulaic sequences , 2014 .

[16]  Alexandra Klampfl.  A comparative study of writing proficiency between an Austrian CLIL and mainstream EFL class with regard to vocabulary , 2010 .

[17]  M. P. A. Llach.  An Overview of Variables Affecting Lexical Transfer in Writing: A Review Study , 2010 .

[18]  I. Miralpeix,et al.  Who Transfers More … and What? Crosslinguistic Influence in Relation to School Grade and Language Dominance in EFL , 2005 .

[19]  Siepmann Dirk,et al.  Discourse Markers Across Languages : A Contrastive Study of Second-Level Discourse Markers in Native and Non-Native Text with Implications for General and Pedagogic Lexicography , 2004 .

[20]  Tom Rankin.  The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research: Learner corpora and grammar , 2015 .

[21]  Norbert Schmitt,et al.  Learner knowledge of phrasal verbs: A corpus-informed study , 2011 .

[22]  A. Cowie.  The Treatment of Collocations and Idioms in Learners' Dictionaries , 1981 .

[23]  N. Schmitt,et al.  How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have?: the effects of frequency and amount of exposure , 2015 .

[24]  Carmen Muñoz,et al.  Symmetries and Asymmetries of Age Effects in Naturalistic and Instructed L2 Learning , 2008 .

[25]  G. Pallotti,et al.  An operational definition of the emergence criterion , 2007 .

[26]  Michael H. Long.  The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[27]  Sylviane Granger,et al.  Disentangling the phraseological web , 2008 .

[28]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Constructions, Chunking, and Connectionism: The Emergence of Second Language Structure , 2008 .

[29]  Peter Andrew Howarth,et al.  Phraseology in English academic writing : some implications for language learning and dictionary making , 1996 .

[30]  Tom Cobb.  Analyzing Late Interlanguage with Learner Corpora: Québec Replications of Three European Studies , 2003 .

[31]  A. Szmalec,et al.  Assessing Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in French-speaking Belgium: Linguistic, cognitive and educational perspectives , 2017 .

[32]  Stephen Krashen,et al.  The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications , 1986 .

[33]  D. J. Tedick,et al.  Content and Language Integration in K–12 Contexts: Student Outcomes, Teacher Practices, and Stakeholder Perspectives , 2012 .

[34]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .

[35]  Christiane Dalton-Puffer,et al.  Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles? , 2011, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[36]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Frequency effects in language acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. (Target article) , 2002 .

[37]  A. Hasselgren,et al.  Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: a study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary , 1994 .

[38]  Carsten Roever.  What learners get for free: learning of routine formulae in ESL and EFL environments , 2012 .

[39]  Christiane Dalton-Puffer,et al.  Claudia Mewald - A comparison of oral foreign language performance of learners in CLIL and in mainstream classes at lower secondary level in Lower Austria 139 , 2007 .

[40]  Jennifer Thewissen.  The phraseological errors of French-, German-, and Spanish speaking EFL learners: Evidence from an error-tagged learner corpus , 2008 .

[41]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Formulaic Language and Second Language Acquisition: Zipf and the Phrasal Teddy Bear , 2012, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[42]  F. Meunier.  Formulaic Language and Language Teaching , 2012, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.