Fractal Geometry in Root Systems : Quantitative Evaluation of Distribution Pattern

In order to describe root distribution quantitatively, fractal analysis was applied to root systems. Root systems of soybean and garden pea seeldings grown in narrow root boxes (30×41×2 cm) were sampled with minimum disturbance of root arrangement using the root box-pin board method. Root samples were taken on 15, 25 and 41 days after sowing for soybean and 30, 55 and 94 days after for graden pea. The harvested root system was spread on the scanner bed connecting to a personal computer (Macintosh IIcx), and the root image was digitized with a 256 gray scale and 144 DPI resolution. Each image stored on a magneto-optical disks loaded on a MO disk drive (Reo drive, Yano Electric) was analyzed by the NIH Image software (ver. 1.5) running on a Macintosh computer (Quadra 800). The fractal dimension (D) of root images was estimated by counting the number of pixels constituting root image at various resolutions (box-counting method). D increased as the root system developed. D of the lower half (Dl) increased slowly compared with that of the upper half. This changing pattern of Dl corresponds well to the slower development of roots into the lower soil layer. The linear positive correlations were found between D and total root length (L) and between D and root projection area (PA). The correlation coefficients between D and L, and between D and PA were lower than that between L and PA. In soybean correlation coefficient between D and L was lower than graden pea, particularly in the lower half of the root system. These results indicate that fractal analysis is applicable to root systems, and that the D can be an effective parameter describing root morphology quantitatively.

[1]  Martin A Mainster,et al.  The fractal properties of retinal vessels: Embryological and clinical implications , 1990, Eye.

[2]  Alastair H. Fitter,et al.  Architectural analysis of plant root systems , 1992 .

[3]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[4]  Charles A. Long Intricate sutures as fractal curves , 1985, Journal of morphology.

[5]  M. Lewis,et al.  Fractal surfaces of proteins. , 1985, Science.

[6]  A. Yamauchi,et al.  A Revised Experimental System of Root-Soil Interaction for Laboratory Workr , 1987 .

[7]  B. Hetrick,et al.  Physical and topological assessment of effects of a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on root architecture of big bluestem , 1988 .

[8]  Akira Yamauchi,et al.  Fractal Analysis of Plant Root Systems , 1989 .

[9]  P. Iannaccone Fractal geometry in mosaic organs: a new interpretation of mosaic pattern , 1990, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[10]  Peter Pfeifer,et al.  A Method for Estimation of Fractal Dimension of Tree Crowns , 1991, Forest Science.

[11]  Alastair H. Fitter,et al.  Fractal Characterization of Root System Architecture , 1992 .

[12]  Fractal analysis of leaf shapes , 1986 .

[13]  P. Pfeifer,et al.  Microbial growth patterns described by fractal geometry , 1990, Journal of bacteriology.

[14]  R. J. Lebowitz Digital image analysis measurement of root length and diameter , 1988 .

[15]  A. Yamauchi,et al.  Quantitative analysis on root system structures of upland rice and maize , 1987 .

[16]  B. Gunnarsson Fractal dimension of plants and body size distribution in spiders , 1992 .

[17]  Alastair H. Fitter,et al.  The Topology and Geometry of Plant Root Systems: Influence of Watering Rate on Root System Topology in Trifolium pratense , 1986 .

[18]  Gail W. T. Wilson,et al.  Architectural analysis of plant root systems 1. Architectural correlates of exploitation efficiency , 1991 .

[19]  Alastair H. Fitter,et al.  Architectural analysis of plant root systems 2. Influence of nutrient supply on architecture in contrasting plant species , 1991 .