Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future

1 Once neglected, the role of facilitative interactions in plant communities has received considerable attention in the last two decades, and is now widely recognized. It is timely to consider the progress made by research in this field. 2 We review the development of plant facilitation research, focusing on the history of the field, the relationship between plant–plant interactions and environmental severity gradients, and attempts to integrate facilitation into mainstream ecological theory. We then consider future directions for facilitation research. 3 With respect to our fundamental understanding of plant facilitation, clarification of the relationship between interactions and environmental gradients is central for further progress, and necessitates the design and implementation of experiments that move beyond the clear limitations of previous studies. 4 There is substantial scope for exploring indirect facilitative effects in plant communities, including their impacts on diversity and evolution, and future studies should connect the degree of non‐transitivity in plant competitive networks to community diversity and facilitative promotion of species coexistence, and explore how the role of indirect facilitation varies with environmental severity. 5 Certain ecological modelling approaches (e.g. individual‐based modelling), although thus far largely neglected, provide highly useful tools for exploring these fundamental processes. 6 Evolutionary responses might result from facilitative interactions, and consideration of facilitation might lead to re‐assessment of the evolution of plant growth forms. 7 Improved understanding of facilitation processes has direct relevance for the development of tools for ecosystem restoration, and for improving our understanding of the response of plant species and communities to environmental change drivers. 8 Attempts to apply our developing ecological knowledge would benefit from explicit recognition of the potential role of facilitative plant–plant interactions in the design and interpretation of studies from the fields of restoration and global change ecology. 9 Synthesis: Plant facilitation research provides new insights into classic ecological theory and pressing environmental issues. Awareness and understanding of facilitation should be part of the basic ecological knowledge of all plant ecologists.

[1]  R. Callaway,et al.  Positive interactions among plants , 1995, The Botanical Review.

[2]  D. Hodáňová Plant strategies and vegetation processes , 1981, Biologia Plantarum.

[3]  O. Huguenin-Elie,et al.  Evenness drives consistent diversity effects in intensive grassland systems across 28 European sites , 2007 .

[4]  Ángela Sierra-Almeida,et al.  Microclimatic Modifications of Cushion Plants and Their Consequences for Seedling Survival of Native and Non-native Herbaceous Species in the High Andes of Central Chile , 2007 .

[5]  Julian D. Olden,et al.  Incorporating positive interactions in aquatic restoration and conservation , 2007 .

[6]  J. Travis,et al.  Modelling species' range shifts in a changing climate: the impacts of biotic interactions, dispersal distance and the rate of climate change. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  Mark V. Wilson Measuring the components of competition along productivity gradients , 2007 .

[8]  B. Muys,et al.  Restoration of Dry Afromontane Forest Using Pioneer Shrubs as Nurse‐Plants for Olea europaea ssp. cuspidata , 2007 .

[9]  J. P. Grime Plant strategy theories: a comment on Craine (2005) , 2007 .

[10]  A. Hastings,et al.  Ecosystem engineering in space and time. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[11]  Alexandra Weigelt,et al.  Identifying mechanisms of competition in multi‐species communities , 2007 .

[12]  R. Callaway Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities , 2007 .

[13]  Timothy G. Howard,et al.  Competitive Networks, Indirect Interactions, and Allelopathy: A Microbial Viewpoint on Plant Communities , 2007 .

[14]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Linking restoration and ecological succession , 2007 .

[15]  R. Michalet Highlighting the multiple drivers of change in interactions along stress gradients. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[16]  H. J. Frank About the authors , 2021, Gov. Inf. Q..

[17]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Biomass responses to elevated CO2, soil heterogeneity and diversity: an experimental assessment with grassland assemblages , 2007, Oecologia.

[18]  A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al.  Modern Quaternary plant lineages promote diversity through facilitation of ancient Tertiary lineages , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  R. Kadmon,et al.  Indirect effects of cattle grazing on shrub spatial pattern in a mediterranean scrub community , 2006 .

[20]  F. Maestre,et al.  Ecosystem structure, function, and restoration success: Are they related? , 2006 .

[21]  M. Miriti Ontogenetic shift from facilitation to competition in a desert shrub , 2006 .

[22]  C Dytham,et al.  The distribution of positive and negative species interactions across environmental gradients on a dual-lattice model. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Importance and intensity of competition along a fertility gradient and across species , 2006 .

[24]  S. Wipf,et al.  Advanced snowmelt causes shift towards positive neighbour interactions in a subarctic tundra community , 2006 .

[25]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? , 2006, Ecology letters.

[26]  Robert A. Laird,et al.  Competitive Intransitivity Promotes Species Coexistence , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[27]  R. Brooker Plant-plant interactions and environmental change. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[28]  Nutrient availability and atmospheric CO2 partial pressure modulate the effects of nutrient heterogeneity on the size structure of populations in grassland species. , 2006, Annals of botany.

[29]  C. Lortie,et al.  Do biotic interactions shape both sides of the humped-back model of species richness in plant communities? , 2006, Ecology letters.

[30]  T. Curt,et al.  Indirect facilitation and competition in tree species colonization of sub-Mediterranean grasslands , 2006 .

[31]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Biotic interactions and plant invasions. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[32]  K. Tielbörger,et al.  Annual plant–shrub interactions along an aridity gradient , 2006 .

[33]  D. Scott,et al.  Transient facilitative effects of heather on Scots pine along a grazing disturbance gradient in Scottish moorland , 2006 .

[34]  Francisco M. Padilla,et al.  The role of nurse plants in the restoration of degraded environments , 2006 .

[35]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Self-organized similarity, the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  K. Tielbörger,et al.  Ontogenetic shifts in interactions among annual plants , 2006 .

[37]  M. Bertness,et al.  Ecosystem Engineering across Environmental Gradients: Implications for Conservation and Management , 2006 .

[38]  F. Pugnaire,et al.  The effect of initial biomass in manipulative experiments on plants , 2006 .

[39]  D. Kikodze,et al.  Seasonal shifts in competition and facilitation in subalpine plant communities of the central Caucasus , 2006 .

[40]  James F. Reynolds,et al.  The stress‐gradient hypothesis does not fit all relationships between plant–plant interactions and abiotic stress: further insights from arid environments , 2006 .

[41]  Christopher J. Lortie,et al.  Re‐analysis of meta‐analysis: support for the stress‐gradient hypothesis , 2006 .

[42]  R. Michalet Is facilitation in arid environments the result of direct or complex interactions? , 2006, The New phytologist.

[43]  Ángela Sierra-Almeida,et al.  Positive interactions between alpine plant species and the nurse cushion plant Laretia acaulis do not increase with elevation in the Andes of central Chile. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[44]  D. Richardson,et al.  Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order , 2006 .

[45]  A. D. Santos,et al.  Specific Interactions between Local Metallicolous Plants Improve the Phytostabilization of Mine Soils , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[46]  Aníbal Pauchard,et al.  Nurse effect of the native cushion plant Azorella monantha on the invasive non-native Taraxacum officinale in the high-Andes of central chile , 2005 .

[47]  F. Pugnaire,et al.  Plant interactions govern population dynamics in a semi‐arid plant community , 2005 .

[48]  A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al.  Effect of shrubs and seasonal variability of rainfall on the establishment of Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco in two edaphically contrasting environments , 2005 .

[49]  R. Densmore Succession on Subalpine Placer Mine Spoil: Effects of Revegetation with Alnus viridis, Alaska, U.S.A , 2005 .

[50]  James F. Reynolds,et al.  Is the change of plant–plant interactions with abiotic stress predictable? A meta‐analysis of field results in arid environments , 2005 .

[51]  Jeffrey Clary,et al.  The ecology of restoration: historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realms , 2005 .

[52]  Ø. Totland,et al.  The relative importance of neighbours and abiotic environmental conditions for population dynamic parameters of two alpine plant species , 2005 .

[53]  R. Callaway,et al.  STRESS TOLERANCE AND COMPETITIVE-RESPONSE ABILITY DETERMINE THE OUTCOME OF BIOTIC INTERACTIONS , 2005 .

[54]  C. Lortie,et al.  LINKING PATTERNS AND PROCESSES IN ALPINE PLANT COMMUNITIES: A GLOBAL STUDY , 2005 .

[55]  J. Fargione,et al.  Diversity decreases invasion via both sampling and complementarity effects , 2005 .

[56]  Christopher J. Lortie,et al.  The importance of importance , 2005 .

[57]  J. Travis,et al.  The interplay of positive and negative species interactions across an environmental gradient: insights from an individual-based simulation model , 2005, Biology Letters.

[58]  K. Klanderud Climate change effects on species interactions in an alpine plant community , 2005 .

[59]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[60]  C. Symon,et al.  Arctic climate impact assessment , 2005 .

[61]  Fernando T. Maestre,et al.  Facilitation and Inhibition of Seedlings of an Invasive Tree (Acer platanoides) by Different Tree Species in a Mountain Ecosystem , 2006, Biological Invasions.

[62]  H. Hauggaard‐Nielsen,et al.  Facilitative Root Interactions in Intercrops , 2005, Plant and Soil.

[63]  F. Maestre,et al.  Mechanisms underlying the interaction between Pinus halepensis and the native late‐successional shrub Pistacia lentiscus in a semi‐arid plantation , 2004 .

[64]  E. Zavaleta,et al.  Realistic Species Losses Disproportionately Reduce Grassland Resistance to Biological Invaders , 2004, Science.

[65]  C. Lortie,et al.  Rethinking plant community theory , 2004 .

[66]  F. Pugnaire,et al.  MEASURING PLANT INTERACTIONS: A NEW COMPARATIVE INDEX , 2004 .

[67]  R. Callaway,et al.  Novel Weapons: Invasive Success and the Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability , 2004 .

[68]  R. Zamora,et al.  Benefits of Using Shrubs as Nurse Plants for Reforestation in Mediterranean Mountains: A 4‐Year Study , 2004 .

[69]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  F. Maestre,et al.  Do positive interactions increase with abiotic stress? A test from a semi-arid steppe , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[71]  Regino Zamora,et al.  APPLYING PLANT FACILITATION TO FOREST RESTORATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF SHRUBS AS NURSE PLANTS , 2004 .

[72]  F. Chapin,et al.  Plant and soil responses to neighbour removal and fertilization in Alaskan tussock tundra , 2004 .

[73]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis , 2004 .

[74]  W. Sutherland,et al.  The need for evidence-based conservation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[75]  K. Yano,et al.  Do pigeon pea and sesbania supply groundwater to intercropped maize through hydraulic lift?—Hydrogen stable isotope investigation of xylem waters , 2004 .

[76]  M. Vilà,et al.  Competition Experiments on Alien Weeds with Crops: Lessons for Measuring Plant Invasion Impact? , 2004, Biological Invasions.

[77]  M. Higashi,et al.  Evolution of mutualism through spatial effects. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[78]  Katja Tielbörger,et al.  Indirect effects in a desert plant community: is competition among annuals more intense under shrub canopies? , 2000, Plant Ecology.

[79]  J. Pate,et al.  Assessing the performance of woody plants in uptake and utilisation of carbon, water and nutrients: Implications for designing agricultural mimic systems , 1999, Agroforestry Systems.

[80]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown? , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[81]  J. Maron,et al.  A native nitrogen-fixing shrub facilitates weed invasion , 1996, Oecologia.

[82]  K. Gross,et al.  Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[83]  J. Flores,et al.  Are nurse-protégé interactions more common among plants from arid environments? , 2003 .

[84]  S. Ormerod,et al.  Meeting the ecological challenges of agricultural change: editors' introduction , 2003 .

[85]  Jean-Philippe Pagés,et al.  A test of the indirect facilitation model in a temperate hardwood forest of the northern French Alps , 2003 .

[86]  F. Maestre,et al.  POSITIVE, NEGATIVE, AND NET EFFECTS IN GRASS–SHRUB INTERACTIONS IN MEDITERRANEAN SEMIARID GRASSLANDS , 2003 .

[87]  E. Siemann,et al.  Changes in light and nitrogen availability under pioneer trees may indirectly facilitate tree invasions of grasslands , 2003 .

[88]  C. Daehler PERFORMANCE COMPARISONS OF Co-OCCURRING NATIVE AND ALIEN INVASIVE PLANTS: Implications for Conservation and Restoration , 2003 .

[89]  Jean-Philippe Pagés,et al.  DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS OF SHADE ON FOUR FOREST TREE SEEDLINGS IN THE FRENCH ALPS , 2003 .

[90]  T. Lenz,et al.  Shade facilitates an invasive stem succulent in a chenopod shrubland in South Australia , 2003 .

[91]  P. Jolliffe,et al.  Indices of plant competition , 2003 .

[92]  R. Callaway,et al.  Insect herbivory and grass competition in a calcareous grassland: results from a plant removal experiment , 2003 .

[93]  M. Bertness,et al.  GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE INTERACTIONS AMONG SALT MARSH PLANTS , 2003 .

[94]  F. Pugnaire,et al.  Shrub spatial aggregation and consequences for reproductive success , 2003, Oecologia.

[95]  L. Walker,et al.  Primary Succession and Ecosystem Rehabilitation: References , 2003 .

[96]  F. Maestre,et al.  Does Pinus halepensis facilitate the establishment of shrubs in Mediterranean semi-arid afforestations? , 2003 .

[97]  J. Travis Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[98]  J. Bruno,et al.  Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory , 2003 .

[99]  Martin A. Nuñez,et al.  Introduced Species and Management of a Nothofagus/Austrocedrus Forest , 2003, Environmental management.

[100]  R. Callaway,et al.  The relative importance of competition for two dominant grass species as affected by environmental manipulations in the field , 2003 .

[101]  INTERLINKAGES BETWEEN BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE Advice on the integration of biodiversity considerations into the implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Kyoto Protocol , 2003 .

[102]  R. Law,et al.  Heteromyopia and the spatial coexistence of similar competitors , 2002 .

[103]  C. Dormann,et al.  Facilitation and competition in the high Arctic: the importance of the experimental approach , 2002 .

[104]  M. Arroyo,et al.  Nurse effect of Bolax gummifera cushion plants in the alpine vegetation of the Chilean Patagonian Andes , 2002 .

[105]  Mark D. Bertness,et al.  Latitudinal and climate-driven variation in the strength and nature of biological interactions in New England salt marshes , 2002, Oecologia.

[106]  C. Lortie,et al.  Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress , 2002, Nature.

[107]  T. Czárán,et al.  Chemical warfare between microbes promotes biodiversity , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[108]  N. Barton,et al.  Multifactorial genetics: Understanding quantitative genetic variation , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[109]  P. Choler,et al.  FACILITATION AND COMPETITION ON GRADIENTS IN ALPINE PLANT COMMUNITIES , 2001 .

[110]  F. Maestre,et al.  POTENTIAL FOR USING FACILITATION BY GRASSES TO ESTABLISH SHRUBS ON A SEMIARID DEGRADED STEPPE , 2001 .

[111]  J. Huisman,et al.  Towards a solution of the plankton paradox : the importance of physiology and life history , 2001 .

[112]  F. Pugnaire,et al.  Changes in plant interactions along a gradient of environmental stress , 2001 .

[113]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Interspecific Competition in Plants: How Well Do Current Methods Answer Fundamental Questions? , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[114]  E. Aschehoug,et al.  Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. , 2000, Science.

[115]  A. Guisan,et al.  Assessing alpine plant vulnerability to climate change: a modeling perspective , 2000 .

[116]  S. Pennings,et al.  Facilitation May Buffer Competitive Effects: Indirect and Diffuse Interactions among Salt Marsh Plants , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[117]  M. Holmgren Combined effects of shade and drought on tulip poplar seedlings : trade-off in tolerance or facilitation? , 2000 .

[118]  J. Lepart,et al.  Positive and negative interactions at different life stages of a colonizing species (Quercus humilis) , 2000 .

[119]  R. Kadmon,et al.  TEMPORAL ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION TIPS THE BALANCE BETWEEN FACILITATION AND INTERFERENCE IN DESERT PLANTS , 2000 .

[120]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  A neighborhood view of interactions among individual plants , 2000 .

[121]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity , 2000 .

[122]  J. Stephen Brewer,et al.  Ecological Assembly Rules: Perspectives, Advances, Retreats , 2000 .

[123]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. , 2000, Science.

[124]  M Rejmánek,et al.  Plant invasions — the role of mutualisms , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[125]  J. Huisman,et al.  Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos , 1999, Nature.

[126]  Pereira,et al.  Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands , 1999, Science.

[127]  M. Bertness,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR FACTORS MAINTAINING PLANT SPECIES DIVERSITY IN A NEW ENGLAND SALT MARSH , 1999 .

[128]  J. Levine INDIRECT FACILITATION: EVIDENCE AND PREDICTIONS FROM A RIPARIAN COMMUNITY , 1999 .

[129]  C. Holzapfel,et al.  BIDIRECTIONAL FACILITATION AND INTERFERENCE BETWEEN SHRUBS AND ANNUALS IN THE MOJAVE DESERT , 1999 .

[130]  L. Walker,et al.  Regeneration of the Mauna Kea silversword Argyroxiphium sandwicense (Asteraceae) in Hawaii , 1999 .

[131]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  EMPIRICAL APPROACHES TO QUANTIFYING INTERACTION INTENSITY: COMPETITION AND FACILITATION ALONG PRODUCTIVITY GRADIENTS , 1999 .

[132]  J. Travis,et al.  Habitat persistence, habitat availability and the evolution of dispersal , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[133]  J. Connolly,et al.  Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plants , 1999 .

[134]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Ecological Assembly Rules: Functional implications of trait–environment linkages in plant communities , 1999 .

[135]  R. Freckleton,et al.  The mis-measurement of plant competition , 1999 .

[136]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects , 1998 .

[137]  R. Callaway Are positive interactions species-specific ? , 1998 .

[138]  Searching for the role of positive interactions in plant communities. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[139]  Terry V. Callaghan,et al.  The balance between positive and negative plant interactions and its relationship to environmental gradients : a model , 1998 .

[140]  John W. Turnbull,et al.  CATALYZING NATIVE FOREST REGENERATION ON DEGRADED TROPICAL LANDS , 1997 .

[141]  J. Lawton,et al.  POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF ORGANISMS AS PHYSICAL ECOSYSTEM ENGINEERS , 1997 .

[142]  Steven D. Gaines,et al.  SOME IMPLICATIONS OF DIRECT POSITIVE INTERACTIONS FOR COMMUNITY SPECIES DIVERSITY , 1997 .

[143]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communities , 1997 .

[144]  L. Walker,et al.  Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities , 1997 .

[145]  R. Callaway Positive interactions in plant communities and the individualistic-continuum concept , 1997, Oecologia.

[146]  E. Haukioja,et al.  Growth response of subarctic dwarf shrubs, Empetrum nigrum and Vaccinium vitis-idaea, to manipulated environmental conditions and species removal , 1997 .

[147]  Walter K. Dodds,et al.  Interspecific interactions : constructing a general neutral model for interaction type , 1997 .

[148]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Measuring plant neighbour effects. Authors' reply , 1997 .

[149]  R. Callaway,et al.  Abiotic Stress and the Relative Importance of Interference and Facilitation in Montane Bunchgrass Communities in Western Montana , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[150]  Peter Haase,et al.  Facilitation between Higher Plant Species in a Semiarid Environment , 1996 .

[151]  E. S. Jensen Barley uptake of N deposited in the rhizosphere of associated field pea , 1996 .

[152]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Responses of Arctic Tundra to Experimental and Observed Changes in Climate , 1995 .

[153]  R. Kadmon,et al.  Effect of shrubs on emergence, survival and fecundity of four coexisting annual species in a sandy desert ecosystem , 1995 .

[154]  H. Olff,et al.  Plant Competition in Relation to Neighbor Biomass: An Intercontinental Study with POA Pratensis , 1994, Ecology.

[155]  T. Miller,et al.  Direct and Indirect Species Interactions in an Early Old-Field Plant Community , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[156]  M. Bertness,et al.  Positive interactions in communities. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[157]  J. Coleman,et al.  Interpreting phenotypic variation in plants. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[158]  G. Woodwell Ecology: The Restoration , 1994 .

[159]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Mechanisms of Primary Succession Following Deglaciation at Glacier Bay, Alaska , 1994 .

[160]  J. Wootton,et al.  The Nature and Consequences of Indirect Effects in Ecological Communities , 1994 .

[161]  J. Grace The effects of habitat productivity on competition intensity. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[162]  L. Aarssen Causes and consequences of variation in competitive ability in plant communities , 1992 .

[163]  V. Brown,et al.  The effects of grazing on local colonisation and extinction during early succession , 1991 .

[164]  J. Grace A clarification of the debate between Grime and Tilman , 1991 .

[165]  M. Austin Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities , 1989 .

[166]  L. Aarssen,et al.  Plants Helping PlantsNew evidence indicates that beneficence is important in vegetation , 1988 .

[167]  M. Hay Associational Plant Defenses and the Maintenance of Species Diversity: Turning Competitors Into Accomplices , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[168]  C. Welden,et al.  The Intensity of Competition Versus its Importance: An Overlooked Distinction and Some Implications , 1986, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[169]  H. Mooney,et al.  Endomycorrhizal Role for Interspecific Transfer of Phosphorus in a Community of Annual Plants , 1982, Science.

[170]  M. Huston A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[171]  J. Thomson Effects of stand composition on insect visitation in two-species mixtures of Hieracium [aurantiacum and Hieracium florentinum]. , 1978 .

[172]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[173]  J. Connell,et al.  Mechanisms of Succession in Natural Communities and Their Role in Community Stability and Organization , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[174]  Stephen H. Levine,et al.  Competitive Interactions in Ecosystems , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[175]  B. Menge,et al.  Organization of the New England Rocky Intertidal Community: Role of Predation, Competition, and Environmental Heterogeneity , 1976 .

[176]  J. P. Grime Vegetation classification by reference to strategies , 1974, Nature.

[177]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Competitive Exclusion in Herbaceous Vegetation , 1973, Nature.

[178]  R. B. Root Organization of a Plant-Arthropod Association in Simple and Diverse Habitats: The Fauna of Collards (Brassica Oleracea) , 1973 .

[179]  C. Mckell,et al.  Contribution of Shrubs to the Nitrogen Economy of a Desert‐Wash Plant Community , 1970 .

[180]  R. L. Crocker,et al.  SOIL DEVELOPMENT IN RELATION TO VEGETATION AND SURFACE AGE AT GLACIER BAY, ALASKA* , 1955 .

[181]  H. Odum,et al.  Fundamentals of ecology , 1954 .

[182]  F. Went The Dependence of Certain Annual Plants on Shrubs in Southern Californi Deserts , 1942 .