A Comparative Study of Yokeless and Segmented Armature Versus Single Sided Axial Flux PM Machine Topologies for Electric Traction

This article systematically compares two axial flux permanent magnet machines designed for a university student racing car application: a double-rotor single-stator yokeless and segmented armature (YASA) structure, and a single-stator single-rotor configuration. Both machines are optimized for minimum loss and active weight using three-dimensional finite element analysis and the highest performing candidate designs are compared in more detail. The studies indicate that the benefits offered by the YASA configuration over the single-stator single-rotor machine are achieved only for specific designs that are heavier. For the design space with lower mass, albeit with increased losses, the Pareto front designs overlap. In this envelope, the YASA configuration demonstrates higher efficiencies at higher speeds, whilst the single-stator single-rotor is more efficient in high torque duty cycles. This shows the performance of the two machines is very similar and the choice is application specific. To validate the finite element analysis used in the optimization, a prototype was built and tested. Results showed good alignment between simulation and experimental data.

[1]  Jinglai Wu,et al.  A Yokeless and Segmented Armature Axial Flux Machine With Novel Cooling System for In-Wheel Traction Applications , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[2]  S. Mukundan,et al.  Structural Analysis of Single-Sided Axial-Flux Permanent Magnet Machines With Different Magnetic Materials , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[3]  G. Pan,et al.  Analytical Calculation and Optimization of the Segmented-Stator Dual-Rotor Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Motors , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[4]  V. Rallabandi,et al.  Evaluating the Effects of Electric and Magnetic Loading on the Performance of Single- and Double-Rotor Axial-Flux PM Machines , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[5]  Reemon Z. Haddad Detection and Identification of Rotor Faults in Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors Due to Manufacturing and Assembly Imperfections , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[6]  Tao Li,et al.  Multiphysics Analysis of an Axial-Flux In-Wheel Motor With an Amorphous Alloy Stator , 2020, IEEE Access.

[7]  Narges Taran,et al.  Systematically Exploring the Effects of Pole Count on the Performance and Cost Limits of UltraHigh Efficiency Fractional hp Axial Flux PM Machines , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[8]  V. Rallabandi,et al.  Systematic Comparison of Two Axial Flux PM Machine Topologies: Yokeless and Segmented Armature versus Single Sided , 2019, 2019 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[9]  F. Caricchi,et al.  Direct Oil Cooling of End-Windings in Torus-Type Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Machines , 2019, 2019 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[10]  Qiang Li,et al.  High Torque Density Fractional-Slot Concentrated-Winding Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Machine with Modular SMC Stator , 2019, 2019 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[11]  Peter Sergeant,et al.  Multiphysics Analysis of a Stator Construction Method in Yokeless and Segmented Armature Axial Flux PM Machines , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[12]  Narges Taran,et al.  Two-Level Surrogate-Assisted Differential Evolution Multi-Objective Optimization of Electric Machines Using 3-D FEA , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[13]  G. J. Atkinson,et al.  A comparison of axial field topologies employing SMC for traction applications , 2016, 2016 19th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS).

[14]  Martin Doppelbauer,et al.  Development of a Yokeless and Segmented Armature Axial Flux Machine , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  Greg Heins,et al.  Computationally efficient method for identifying manufacturing induced rotor and stator misalignment in permanent magnet brushless machines , 2015, 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[16]  Bo Zhang,et al.  A comparison of the transverse, axial and radial flux PM synchronous motors for electric vehicle , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Electric Vehicle Conference (IEVC).

[17]  Greg Heins,et al.  Combined experimental and numerical method for loss separation in permanent magnet brushless machines , 2014, 2014 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[18]  F. Caricchi,et al.  Recent Advances in Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Machine Technology , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[19]  W. Fei,et al.  A new axial flux permanent magnet Segmented-Armature-Torus machine for in-wheel direct drive applications , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference.

[20]  T.J. Woolmer,et al.  Analysis of the Yokeless And Segmented Armature Machine , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference.

[21]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[22]  Timothy J. E. Miller,et al.  Theoretical limitations to the field-weakening performance of the five classes of brushless synchronous AC motor drive , 1993 .

[23]  E. Spooner,et al.  TORUS' : a slotless, toroidal-stator, permanent-magnet generator , 1992 .

[24]  P. D. Evans,et al.  Disc-geometry homopolar synchronous machine , 1980 .

[25]  Malcolm D. McCulloch,et al.  Predicting the Temperature and Flow Distribution in a Direct Oil-Cooled Electrical Machine With Segmented Stator , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.