Metering system planning for state estimation via evolutionary algorithm and HTΔ matrix considering SCADA and PMU measurements

Some years ago an efficient methodology for SCADA metering system planning was developed. The methodology enables the design of Reliable Metering Systems (RMSs) for state estimation purposes (i.e., observable metering systems free from critical measurements, critical sets and critical Remote Terminal Units), minimizing investment costs. It is based on Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) and the analysis of the HΔ matrix. This paper reports on the extension of this methodology for the incorporation of synchronized phasor measurements, which are provided by Phasor Measurement Units. The aim is to obtain an efficient methodology that enables the design of RMSs considering the existence of both non-synchronized SCADA measurements and synchronized phasor measurements, minimizing investment costs. To demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed methodology, some of several test results of its application in the IEEE 30-bus and 57-bus systems will be presented. Some results will be compared to those obtained by other methodologies.

[1]  R. Kavasseri,et al.  Joint Placement of Phasor and Power Flow Measurements for Observability of Power Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  M.B. Do Coutto Filho,et al.  Meter placement for power system state estimation using simulated annealing , 2001, 2001 IEEE Porto Power Tech Proceedings (Cat. No.01EX502).

[3]  Demetrios G. Eliades,et al.  Placement of Synchronized Measurements for Power System Observability , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[4]  N. Bretas,et al.  Analysis of measurement-set qualitative characteristics for state-estimation purposes , 2007 .

[5]  J.G. Rolim,et al.  Metering Scheme Optimization With Emphasis on Ensuring Bad-Data Processing Capability , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Nikolaos M. Manousakis,et al.  Numerical observability method for optimal phasor measurement units placement using recursive Tabu search method , 2013 .

[7]  P. S. Georgilakis,et al.  Taxonomy of PMU Placement Methodologies , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  N. G. Bretas,et al.  Metering system planning for state estimation via evolutionary algorithm and HΔ matrix , 2009, 2009 IEEE Bucharest PowerTech.

[9]  A. Abur,et al.  Effect of Phasor Measurements on the Choice of Reference Bus for State Estimation , 2007, 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[10]  A.G. Phadke,et al.  An Alternative for Including Phasor Measurements in State Estimators , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  M.B.D.C. Filho,et al.  Optimal metering systems for monitoring power networks under multiple topological scenarios , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[12]  G. Krumpholz,et al.  Power System Observability: A Practical Algorithm Using Network Topology , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[13]  Arun G. Phadke,et al.  Synchronized phasor measurements-a historical overview , 2002, IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition.

[14]  Newton G. Bretas,et al.  Method for meter and RTU placement for state estimation purposes , 2003, 2003 IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference Proceedings,.

[15]  N.G. Bretas,et al.  Redundancy and Observability Analysis of Conventional and PMU Measurements , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.