Observer Models as a Surrogate to Perception Experiments

[1]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Derivation of an Observer Model Adapted to Irregular Signals Based on Convolution Channels , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Grace J Gang,et al.  Task-based detectability in CT image reconstruction by filtered backprojection and penalized likelihood estimation. , 2014, Medical physics.

[3]  Nooshin Kiarashi,et al.  Task-based strategy for optimized contrast enhanced breast imaging: analysis of six imaging techniques for mammography and tomosynthesis. , 2014, Medical physics.

[4]  Qihua Zhao,et al.  Active pixel imagers incorporating pixel-level amplifiers based on polycrystalline-silicon thin-film transistors. , 2009, Medical physics.

[5]  Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al.  Comparison of model and human observer performance for detection and discrimination tasks using dual-energy x-ray images. , 2008, Medical physics.

[6]  Arthur E Burgess,et al.  Signal detection in power-law noise: effect of spectrum exponents. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[7]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Classification images for simple detection and discrimination tasks in correlated noise. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Evaluation of internal noise methods for Hotelling observer models. , 2007, Medical physics.

[9]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  Incidence of advanced symptomatic disease as primary endpoint in screening and prevention trials. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Evaluation of Multiclass Model Observers in PET LROC Studies , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[11]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Optimization of dual-energy imaging systems using generalized NEQ and imaging task. , 2006, Medical physics.

[12]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Amorphous selenium flat panel detectors for digital mammography: validation of a NPWE model observer with CDMAM observer performance experiments. , 2006, Medical physics.

[13]  Ingrid Reiser,et al.  Identification of simulated microcalcifications in white noise and mammographic backgrounds. , 2006, Medical physics.

[14]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  Automated optimization of JPEG 2000 encoder options based on model observer performance for detecting variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Luisa P. Wallace,et al.  Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  R. G. Wells,et al.  A comparison of human and model observers in multislice LROC studies , 2005, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[18]  Michael A. King,et al.  Comparison of human- and model-observer LROC studies , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[19]  H.H. Barrett,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[20]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  P. Xue,et al.  Dose efficiency and low-contrast detectability of an amorphous silicon x-ray detector for digital radiography. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Modeling Visual Detection Tasks in Correlated Image Noise with Linear Model Observers , 2000 .

[23]  Peter G. J. Barten,et al.  Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its e ects on image quality , 1999 .

[24]  A E Burgess,et al.  The Rose model, revisited. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[25]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[26]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[27]  A. Burgess.  Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. , 1995, Medical physics.

[28]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Lesion detection in structured noise. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[29]  A. Burgess.  Statistically defined backgrounds: performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[30]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  SNR and noise measurements for medical imaging: I. A practical approach based on statistical decision theory. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Jie Yao,et al.  Predicting human performance by a channelized Hotelling observer model , 1992, Optics & Photonics.

[32]  H H Barrett,et al.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[33]  H H Barrett,et al.  Ideal versus human observer for long-tailed point spread functions: does deconvolution help? , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  A B Watson,et al.  Efficiency of a model human image code. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[35]  A J Ahumada,et al.  Putting the visual system noise back in the picture. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[36]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[37]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  The cortex transform: rapid computation of simulated neural images , 1987 .

[38]  R G Swensson,et al.  Display thresholding of images and observer detection performance. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[39]  C. Metz.  ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[40]  H. Barrett,et al.  Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[41]  R. L. de Valois,et al.  Relationship between spatial-frequency and orientation tuning of striate-cortex cells. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[42]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  D. Kersten.  Spatial summation in visual noise , 1984, Vision Research.

[44]  John A. Swets,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory , 1982 .

[45]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[46]  Philip F. Judy,et al.  Lesion detection and signal–to–noise ratio in CT images , 1981 .

[47]  K. Hanson,et al.  Detectability in computed tomographic images. , 1979, Medical physics.

[48]  D. H. Kelly.  Spatial frequency selectivity in the retina , 1975, Vision Research.

[49]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1972 .

[50]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[51]  A. Rose,et al.  Quantum and noise limitations of the visual process. , 1953, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[52]  P. Mahalanobis.  On the generalized distance in statistics , 1936 .