Adjustable adaboost classifier and pyramid features for image-based cervical cancer diagnosis

Cervical cancer is the third most common type of cancer in women worldwide. Most death cases of cervical cancer occur in less developed areas of the world. In this work, we develop an automated and low-cost method that is applicable in those low-resource regions. First, we propose a more distinctive multi-feature descriptor for encoding the cervical image information by enhancing an existing descriptor with the pyramid histogram of local binary pattern (PLBP) feature. Second, we apply the AdaBoost algorithm to perform feature selection, and train a binary classifier to differentiate high-risk patient visits from low-risk patient visits. Our AdaBoost classifier can be adjusted to achieve high specificity, which is necessary for use in clinical practice. Experiments on both balanced and imbalanced datasets are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of our method. Our method is shown to achieve better performance than existing image-based CIN classification systems and also outperform human interpretations on various screening tests.

[1]  David C Wilbur,et al.  The Becton Dickinson FocalPoint GS Imaging System: clinical trials demonstrate significantly improved sensitivity for the detection of important cervical lesions. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.

[2]  Xiaolei Huang,et al.  A Data Driven Approach to Cervigram Image Analysis and Classification , 2013 .

[3]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Representing shape with a spatial pyramid kernel , 2007, CIVR '07.

[4]  Patrik Malm,et al.  Image Analysis in Support of Computer-Assisted Cervical Cancer Screening , 2013 .

[5]  L. Mango,et al.  Design and methods of a population-based natural history study of cervical neoplasia in a rural province of Costa Rica: the Guanacaste Project. , 1997, Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health.

[6]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  Discriminative sparse representations for cervigram image segmentation , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[7]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Quickly Boosting Decision Trees - Pruning Underachieving Features Early , 2013, ICML.

[8]  Hayit Greenspan,et al.  Automatic detection of specular reflections in uterine cervix images , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[9]  Jeff Heflin,et al.  Multimodal Entity Coreference for Cervical Dysplasia Diagnosis , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  B. Dziura,et al.  Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System. , 2005, American journal of clinical pathology.

[12]  Jenq-Neng Hwang,et al.  Integration of neural networks and decision tree classifiers for automated cytology screening , 1991, IJCNN-91-Seattle International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[13]  L Gaffikin,et al.  A critical assessment of screening methods for cervical neoplasia , 2005, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[14]  Qiang Ji,et al.  Classifying cervix tissue patterns with texture analysis , 2000, Pattern Recognit..

[15]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[16]  Jia Gu,et al.  Automated image analysis of uterine cervical images , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[17]  Noor Azuan Abu Osman,et al.  Intelligent Screening Systems for Cervical Cancer , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.