Getting to Yes or Bailing on No: The Site Selection Process of Ethanol Plants in Wisconsin†

Prior studies of ethanol location rest on the assumption that ethanol producers are economic free agents—evaluating sites as if all counties are contenders for their business, weighing the availability of feedstocks along with their infrastructure needs, operating without ties to localities, and being subject to enticement from policy incentives. We analyze the political-economic process through which ethanol plants come into communities by examining plant location decisions, plant financing, community receptivity toward the plant, local government incentives, and the dynamics of the approval process. We use case studies of ethanol plants in Wisconsin to explore the economic, social, and political dynamics of ethanol plant location. Our case studies provide evidence in support of some findings in the ethanol location literature—such as the importance of access to corn; however, they also suggest site selection criteria not adequately addressed by the literature. Furthermore, our data suggest that capital may not be as mobile as location theory assumes it to be and that location decisions are not primarily determined by consideration of profit maximization. Instead, the location of ethanol plants is greatly influenced by the extent to which the original initiators of the plant are locally embedded in its host community. Our research answers Barkley and McNamara's (1994:45) call for a return to a case studies approach in order to develop “reliable insights into the location process.”

[1]  K. McNamara,et al.  Community Attributes Influencing Local Food Processing Growth in the U.S. Corn Belt , 1997 .

[2]  Burton C. English,et al.  Sixty Billion Gallons by 2030: Economic and Agricultural Impacts of Ethanol and Biodiesel Expansion , 2007 .

[3]  Carmen Bain,et al.  Local ownership of ethanol plants: What are the effects on communities? , 2011 .

[4]  D. Swenson,et al.  Determining the Regional Economic Values of Ethanol Production in Iowa Considering Different Levels of Local Investment , 2006 .

[5]  Dayton M. Lambert,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity of factors determining ethanol production site selection in the U.S., 2000-2007. , 2011 .

[6]  Paul Brace The Changing Context of State Political Economy , 1991, The Journal of Politics.

[7]  H. Wolman,et al.  The Politics of Local Economic Development , 1996 .

[8]  Community Support of Ethanol Plants: Does Local Ownership Matter?* , 2012 .

[9]  John P. Blair,et al.  Major Factors in Industrial Location: A Review , 1987 .

[10]  R. Feiock,et al.  Impact Fees, Growth Management, and Development , 2006 .

[11]  Peter Elisinger,et al.  State Economic Development in the 1990s: Politics and Policy Learning , 1995 .

[12]  Manufacturers' Location Decisions: Do Surveys Provide Helpful Insights? , 1994 .

[13]  K. McNamara,et al.  THE LOCATION OF FOOD MANUFACTURING PLANT INVESTMENTS IN CORN BELT COUNTIES , 2000 .

[14]  Richard Goe,et al.  Biofuels Bonanza?: Exploring community perceptions of the promises and perils of biofuels production , 2011 .

[15]  M. Winter Embeddedness, the new food economy and defensive localism , 2003 .

[16]  David A. Swenson,et al.  Input-Outrageous: The Economic Impacts of Modern Biofuels Production , 2006 .

[17]  D. Lambert,et al.  Ethanol Plant Location Determinants and County Comparative Advantage , 2008, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[18]  Spatial Competition and Ethanol Plant Location Decisions , 2012 .

[19]  A. Isserman,et al.  Ethanol and the Local Economy , 2009 .

[20]  Gary Taylor,et al.  Locational Choices of the Ethanol Industry in the Midwest Corn Belt , 2010 .

[21]  Warren P. Kriesel,et al.  Human Capital Stock and Flow and Economic Growth Analysis: Note , 1988 .

[22]  Cem Canel,et al.  Underlying dimensions of business location decisions , 1998 .

[23]  R. Feiock The Effects of Economic Development Policy on Local Economic Growth , 1991 .