Ouantification of carbon savings from improved biomass cookstove projects.

In spite of growing interest, a principal obstacle to wider inclusion of improved cookstove projects in carbon trading schemes has been the lack of accountability in estimating CO2-equivalent (CO2-e) savings. To demonstrate that robust estimates of CO2-e savings can be obtained at reasonable cost, an integrated approach of community-based subsampling of traditional and improved stoves in homes to estimate fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, combined with spatially explicit community-based estimates of the fraction of nonrenewable biomass harvesting (fNRB), was used to estimate CO2-e savings for 603 homes with improved Patsari stoves in Purépecha communities of Michoacán, Mexico. Mean annual household CO2-e savings for CO2, CH4, CO, and nonmethane hydrocarbons were 3.9 tCO2-e home(-1) yr(-1) (95% Cl +/- 22%), and for Kyoto gases (CO2 and CH4) were 3.1 tCO2-e home(-1) yr(-1) (95% Cl +/- 26%), respectively, using a weighted mean fNRB harvesting of 39%. CO2-e savings ranged from 1.6 (95% Cl +/- 49%) to 7.5 (95% Cl +/- 17%) tCO2-e home(-1) yr(-1) for renewable and nonrenewable harvesting in individual communities, respectively. Since emission factors, fuel consumption, and fNRB each contribute significantly to the overall uncertainty in estimates of CO2-e savings, community-based assessment of all of these parameters is critical for robust estimates. Reporting overall uncertainty in the CO2-e savings estimates provides a mechanism for valuation of carbon offsets, which would promote better accounting that CO2-e savings had actually been achieved. Cost of CO2-e savings as a result of adoption of Patsari stoves was U.S. $8 per tCO2-e based on initial stove costs, monitoring costs, and conservative stove adoption rates, which is approximately 4 times less expensive than use of carbon capture and storage from coal plants, and approximately 18 times less than solar power. The low relative cost of CO2-e abatement of improved stoves combined with substantial health cobenefits through reduction in indoor air pollution provides a strong rationale for targeting these less expensive carbon mitigation options, while providing substantial economic assistance for stove dissemination efforts.

[1]  S. Solomon.  The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[2]  I. Romieu,et al.  Health Impact Assessment Due to the Introduction of Improved Stoves in Michoacan, Mexico , 2006 .

[3]  Grant Ballard-Tremeer,et al.  Emissions of Rural Wood-Burning Cooking Devices , 1997 .

[4]  Rufus Edwards,et al.  An assessment of programs to promote improved household stoves in China , 2004 .

[5]  M. Cannell,et al.  Dry matter partitioning in tree crops , 1985 .

[6]  Omar Masera,et al.  The impact of improved wood-burning stoves on fine particulate matter concentrations in rural Mexican homes , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[7]  Ariel E. Lugo,et al.  Biomass Estimation Methods for Tropical Forests with Applications to Forest Inventory Data , 1989, Forest Science.

[8]  H. H. Jawurek,et al.  Comparison of five rural, wood-burning cooking devices: efficiencies and emissions. , 1996 .

[9]  Yongliang Ma,et al.  Greenhouse Gases and other Airborne Pollutants from Household Stoves in China: a Database for Emission Factors , 2000 .

[10]  D. Pennise,et al.  The MMT Bag for Emission Source Sampling: Design and Evaluation , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[11]  Kirk R. Smith,et al.  Models to predict emissions of health-damaging pollutants and global warming contributions of residential fuel/stove combinations in China. , 2003, Chemosphere.

[12]  Satoshi Ito,et al.  Re-assessment of woodfuel supply and demand relationships in Kampong Thom Province, Cambodia , 2006 .

[13]  John M. Reilly,et al.  The costs of the Kyoto protocol in the European Union , 2003 .

[14]  Ralph E.H. Sims,et al.  Carbon emission and mitigation cost comparisons between fossil fuel, nuclear and renewable energy resources for electricity generation , 2003 .

[15]  Rufus Edwards,et al.  In-field greenhouse gas emissions from cookstoves in rural Mexican households , 2008 .

[16]  A. Lugo,et al.  Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests , 1997 .

[17]  Sandra Brown,et al.  The Storage and Production of Organic Matter in Tropical Forests and Their Role in the Global Carbon Cycle , 1982 .

[18]  Kirk R. Smith,et al.  Implications of changes in household stoves and fuel use in China , 2004 .

[19]  O. Masera,et al.  Why current assessment methods may lead to significant underestimation of GHG reductions of improved stoves. , 2007 .

[20]  David Brokensha,et al.  Wood fuel surveys. , 1983 .

[21]  Tami C Bond,et al.  Emission factors and real-time optical properties of particles emitted from traditional wood burning cookstoves. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Daniel M Kammen,et al.  Greenhouse gas implications of household energy technology in Kenya. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Omar Masera,et al.  Reduction in personal exposures to particulate matter and carbon monoxide as a result of the installation of a Patsari improved cook stove in Michoacan Mexico. , 2008, Indoor air.

[24]  Kirk R. Smith,et al.  GREENHOUSE IMPLICATIONS OF HOUSEHOLD STOVES: An Analysis for India , 2000 .

[25]  Omar Masera,et al.  Social perceptions about a technological innovation for fuelwood cooking : Case study in rural Mexico , 2007 .

[26]  Satoshi Ito,et al.  Spatial analysis of woodfuel supply and demand in Kampong Thom Province, Cambodia , 2004 .

[27]  C. Venkataraman,et al.  Emission factors of carbon monoxide and size-resolved aerosols from biofuel combustion. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  J. Navar,et al.  Preliminary estimates of biomass growth in the Tamaulipan thornscrub in north-eastern Mexico , 2001 .

[29]  P. Abdul Salam,et al.  Emission factors of wood and charcoal-fired cookstoves , 2002 .

[30]  P. Crutzen,et al.  Biomass burning as a source of atmospheric gases , 1979 .

[31]  Rufus Edwards,et al.  Impact of Patsari improved cookstoves on indoor air quality in Michoacán, Mexico , 2007 .

[32]  Tami C. Bond,et al.  Laboratory and field investigations of particulate and carbon monoxide emissions from traditional and improved cookstoves , 2009 .

[33]  Evans Kituyi,et al.  Carbon monoxide and nitric oxide from biofuel fires in Kenya , 2001 .

[34]  Omar Masera,et al.  A GIS-based methodology for highlighting fuelwood supply/demand imbalances at the local level: A case study for Central Mexico , 2009 .

[35]  Omar Masera,et al.  WISDOM: A GIS-based supply demand mapping tool for woodfuel management , 2006 .

[36]  O. Masera,et al.  Energy performance of wood-burning cookstoves in Michoacan, Mexico. , 2008 .

[37]  M. Andreae,et al.  Domestic Combustion of Biomass Fuels in Developing Countries: A Major Source of Atmospheric Pollutants , 2003 .

[38]  Omar Masera,et al.  Spatial analysis of residential fuelwood supply and demand patterns in Mexico using the WISDOM approach. , 2007 .

[39]  Regeneration and Population Dynamics of Quercus rugosa at the Ajusco Volcano, Mexico , 2006 .

[40]  Thomas B. Reed,et al.  Thermal Data for Natural and Synthetic Fuels , 1998 .

[41]  M. Cannell,et al.  Woody biomass of forest stands , 1984 .

[42]  Rene D. Martinez,et al.  Carbon content in vegetation, litter, and soil under 10 different land-use and land-cover classes in the Central Highlands of Michoacan, Mexico , 2008 .