Regarding Champod, editorial: "Research focused mainly on bias will paralyse forensic science".
暂无分享，去创建一个
Jennifer L. Mnookin | S. Zabell | R. Rosenthal | M. Saks | D. Krane | W. Thompson | A. Jamieson | R. Koppl | I. Kornfield | D. Risinger
[1] C. Champod. Research focused mainly on bias will paralyse forensic science. , 2014, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[2] Cedric Neumann,et al. Improving the Understanding and the Reliability of the Concept of "Sufficiency" in Friction Ridge Examination , 2014 .
[3] Cedric Neumann,et al. Quantifying the weight of evidence from a forensic fingerprint comparison: a new paradigm , 2012 .
[4] W. Thompson. What role should investigative facts play in the evaluation of scientific evidence? , 2011 .
[5] Norah Rudin,et al. Commentary on: Thornton JI. Letter to the editor—a rejection of “working blind” as a cure for contextual bias. J Forensic Sci 2010;55(6):1663 , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.
[6] National Research Council. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward , 2009, CrimRxiv.
[7] Law. Policy. Executive Summary of the National Academies of Science Reports, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward , 2009 .
[8] Simon Ford,et al. Sequential Unmasking: A Means of Minimizing Observer Effects in Forensic DNA Interpretation , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.
[9] William C. Thompson,et al. The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion , 2002 .