7 Tesla (T) human cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using FLASH and SSFP to assess cardiac function: validation against 1.5 T and 3 T.

We report the first comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T field strengths using steady state free precession (SSFP) and fast low angle shot (FLASH) cine sequences. Cardiac volumes and mass measurements were assessed for feasibility, reproducibility and validity at each given field strength using FLASH and SSFP sequences. Ten healthy volunteers underwent retrospectively electrocardiogram (ECG) gated CMR at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T using FLASH and SSFP sequences. B1 and B0 shimming and frequency scouts were used to optimise image quality. Cardiac volume and mass measurements were not significantly affected by field strength when using the same imaging sequence (P > 0.05 for all parameters at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T). SSFP imaging returned larger end diastolic and end systolic volumes and smaller left ventricular masses than FLASH imaging at 7 T, and at the lower field strengths (P < 0.05 for each parameter). However, univariate general linear model analysis with fixed effects for sequence and field strengths found an interaction between imaging sequence and field strength (P = 0.03), with a smaller difference in volumes and mass measurements between SSFP and FLASH imaging at 7 T than 1.5 T and 3 T. SSFP and FLASH cine imaging at 7 T is technically feasible and provides valid assessment of cardiac volumes and mass compared with CMR imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T field strengths. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  J. Pauly,et al.  Saturated double‐angle method for rapid B1+ mapping , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  G J Metzger,et al.  Initial results of cardiac imaging at 7 tesla , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  D. Pennell,et al.  Breath-hold FLASH and FISP cardiovascular MR imaging: left ventricular volume differences and reproducibility. , 2002, Radiology.

[4]  Anja C S Brau,et al.  Fiber‐optic stethoscope: A cardiac monitoring and gating system for magnetic resonance microscopy , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Advances in high-field magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[6]  Manesh R. Patel,et al.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. , 2010, Circulation.

[7]  H. Wen,et al.  The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in human cardiac imaging at 1.5, 3, and 4 T. , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[8]  Peter Andersen,et al.  Whole‐body imaging at 7T: Preliminary results , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Feasibility of Cardiac Gating Free of Interference With Electro-Magnetic Fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla Using an MR-Stethoscope , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[10]  G. Metzger,et al.  Local B1+ shimming for prostate imaging with transceiver arrays at 7T based on subject‐dependent transmit phase measurements , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  R. Goebel,et al.  7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal‐to‐noise comparison in head images , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Scott B Reeder,et al.  Cardiac MRI of ischemic heart disease at 3 T: potential and challenges. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[13]  K. Ugurbil,et al.  Very Fast Multi Channel B 1 Calibration at High Field in the Small Flip Angle Regime , 2008 .

[14]  Kieran Clarke,et al.  Determination of cardiac volumes and mass with FLASH and SSFP cine sequences at 1.5 vs. 3 Tesla: A validation study , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Stefan Neubauer,et al.  Normal human left and right ventricular and left atrial dimensions using steady state free precession magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[16]  Accf Task Force Members ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents , 2010 .

[17]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[18]  M. Stuber,et al.  Initial results on in vivo human coronary MR angiography at 7 T , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  V L Morgan,et al.  Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[20]  L. Shaw,et al.  Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Clinical Indications for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (cmr): Consensus Panel Report , 2022 .