Knowledge Discovery from Unsupervised Data in Support of Decision Making

Publisher Summary Knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD)—the rapidly growing interdisciplinary field that merges database management, statistics, machine learning, and related areas—aims to extract useful knowledge from a large collection of data. Current technology makes it easy to generate large collections of data of different types in different forms. To some extent, in this variety of data sources, KDD methods can be distinguished by the degree of supervision in data. In general, the “degree of supervision” concerns either the supervision of humans or the supervision in data. Although a domain expert plays an important role in the discovery process, discovery methods themselves are independent of the domain expert but dependent on the supervision in data. Most work in knowledge discovery has focused on supervised discovery tasks that aimed to find useful descriptions (patterns or models) of classes of classified instances. Supervised discovery methods are always driven by feedback about the appropriateness of discovered knowledge. In real-world situations, unsupervised discovery task can also arise quite often. This chapter concerns mainly with knowledge discovery in unsupervised data.

[1]  X. Wu,et al.  Hybrid interpretation of induction results , 1996, IFIP World Conference on IT Tools.

[2]  S. Wrobel Concept Formation and Knowledge Revision , 1994, Springer US.

[3]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[4]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery: An Overview , 1996, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.

[5]  R. Wille Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems , 1992 .

[6]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Generalization as Search , 2002 .

[7]  Catherine Blake,et al.  UCI Repository of machine learning databases , 1998 .

[8]  John A. Hartigan,et al.  Clustering Algorithms , 1975 .

[9]  Rokia Missaoui,et al.  An Incremental Concept Formation Approach for Learning from Databases , 1994, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[10]  Tu Bao Ho,et al.  Discovering and using knowledge from unsupervised data , 1997, Decis. Support Syst..

[11]  Brian A. Davey,et al.  An Introduction to Lattices and Order , 1989 .

[12]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Case-Based Reasoning , 1989, IJCAI 1989.

[13]  M. Pazzani,et al.  Concept formation knowledge and experience in unsupervised learning , 1991 .

[14]  H. Ralambondrainy,et al.  A conceptual version of the K-means algorithm , 1995, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[15]  G. De Soete,et al.  Clustering and Classification , 2019, Data-Driven Science and Engineering.

[16]  Tu Bao Ho,et al.  Study of a Mixed Similarity Measure for Classification and Clustering , 1999, PAKDD.

[17]  David J. Hand,et al.  Data Mining: Statistics and More? , 1998 .

[18]  Tu Bao Ho,et al.  An Approach to Concept Formation Based on Formal Concept Analysis , 1995, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Tu Bao Ho Unsupervised Concept Learning Using Rough Concept Analysis , 1998 .

[20]  Ryszard S. Michalski,et al.  Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis , 1993 .

[21]  Willi Klösgen,et al.  Explora: A Multipattern and Multistrategy Discovery Assistant , 1996, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.

[22]  Pat Langley,et al.  Elements of Machine Learning , 1995 .

[23]  Robert E. Kent,et al.  Rough Concept Analysis , 1993, RSKD.

[24]  Pat Langley,et al.  Models of Incremental Concept Formation , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[25]  Peter C. Cheeseman,et al.  Bayesian Classification (AutoClass): Theory and Results , 1996, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.

[26]  Alain Guénoche,et al.  Galois approach to the induction of concepts , 1993 .

[27]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Categories and concepts , 1984 .