Diversity of Students' Views about Evidence, Theory, and the Interface between Science and Religion in an Astronomy Course

Arguments for teaching about the nature of science have been made for several decades. The most recent science education policy documents continue to assert the need for students to understand the nature of science. However, little research actually explores how students develop these understandings in the context of a specific course. We examine the growth in students' understanding about the nature of astronomy in a one-semester college course. In addition to student work collected for 340 students in the course, we also interviewed focus students three times during the course. In this article we briefly describe class data and discuss in detail how five students developed their ideas throughout the course. In particular, we show the ways in which students respond to instruction with respect to the extent to which they (a) demand and examine evidence used for justifying claims, (b) integrate scientific and religious views, and (c) distinguish between scientific and nonscientific theories. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 37: 340–362, 2000.

[1]  Alfonso Gumico Dagron.  Making Waves , 2001 .

[2]  William W. Cobern,et al.  World View Theory and Science Education Research , 2000 .

[3]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Assessing the Nature of Science: What is the Nature of Our Assessments? , 1998 .

[4]  Brian Alters.  Nature of science: A diversity or uniformity of ideas? , 1997 .

[5]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Effects of Dyadic Interaction on Argumentive Reasoning , 1997 .

[6]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Beliefs about the Nature of Science and the Enacted Science Curriculum , 1997 .

[7]  Heinz Meyling,et al.  How to Change Students‘ Conceptions of the Epistemology of Science , 1997 .

[8]  Zoubeida R. Dagher,et al.  Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution , 1997 .

[9]  S. Norris.  Intellectual independence for nonscientists and other content‐transcendent goals of science education , 1997 .

[10]  Wolff‐Michael Roth.  The interaction of students’ scientific and religious discourses: two case studies , 1997 .

[11]  L. Scott,et al.  Large‐scale exploration of pupils' understanding of the nature of science , 1996 .

[12]  R. Driver,et al.  Young people's images of science , 1996 .

[13]  J. Haught.  Science and Religion: From Conflict to Conversation , 1995 .

[14]  Elizabeth C. Doster,et al.  Hearts and minds in the science classroom: The education of a confirmed evolutionist , 1995 .

[15]  R. Dawkins.  River Out of Eden , 1995 .

[16]  J. Polkinghorne.  The Faith Of A Physicist , 1996 .

[17]  W. B. Stanley,et al.  Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education , 1994 .

[18]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Physics students' epistemologies and views about knowing and learning , 1994 .

[19]  A. Ryan,et al.  Students' Preconceptions about the Epistemology of Science , 1992 .

[20]  George M. Bodner,et al.  The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints , 1992 .

[21]  Norman G. Lederman.  Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[22]  J. F. Voss,et al.  Learning to Reason via Instruction in Argumentation. , 1991 .

[23]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  Teachers' Beliefs About the Nature of Science and Their Relationship to Classroom Practice , 1990 .

[24]  Susan Carey,et al.  `An experiment is when you try it and see if it works': a study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge , 1989 .

[25]  D. Kuhn.  Children and adults as intuitive scientists. , 1989, Psychological review.

[26]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  A case study of high school teachers' decision making models for planning and teaching science , 1989 .

[27]  G. Aikenhead.  High‐school graduates' beliefs about science‐technology‐society. III. Characteristics and limitations of scientific knowledge , 1987 .

[28]  Alan G. Ryan,et al.  High‐school graduates' beliefs about science‐technology‐society. I. methods and issues in monitoring student views , 1987 .

[29]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[30]  Peter A. Rubba,et al.  Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge , 1978 .

[31]  G. Aikenhead.  The measurement of high school students' knowledge about science and scientists , 1973 .

[32]  Lindsay D. Mackay,et al.  Development of understanding about the nature of science , 1971 .

[33]  Donald J. Schmidt.  Test on understanding science: A comparison among several groups , 1967 .

[34]  Glenn H. Crumb.  Understanding of science in high school physics , 1965 .

[35]  J. Trent.  The attainment of the concept “understanding science” using contrasting physics courses , 1965 .

[36]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .