Dynamic Navigation in Dental Implantology: The Influence of Surgical Experience on Implant Placement Accuracy and Operating Time. An in Vitro Study

Aim: the aim of this in vitro study was to test whether the implant placement accuracy and the operating time can be influenced by the operator’s experience. Materials and methods: sixteen models underwent a (Cone Beam Computer Tomography) CBCT and implant positioning was digitally planned on this. The models were randomly assigned to four operators with different levels of surgical experience. One hundred and twelve implant sites were drilled using a dynamic navigation system and operating times were measured. Based on postoperative CBCTs, dental implants were virtually inserted and superimposed over the planned ones. Two-dimensional and 3D deviations between planned and virtually inserted implants were measured at the entry point and at the apical point. Angular and vertical errors were also calculated. Results: considering coronal and apical 3D deviations, no statistically significant differences were found between the four operators (p = 0.27; p = 0.06). Some vectorial components of the deviation at the apical point and the angular errors of some operators differed from each other. Conclusions: within the limitations of this study, dynamic navigation can be considered a reliable technique both for experienced and novice clinicians.

[1]  Richard Leesungbok,et al.  Reliability of a CAD/CAM Surgical Guide for Implant Placement: An In Vitro Comparison of Surgeons' Experience Levels and Implant Sites. , 2017, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[2]  M. Cassetta,et al.  How much does experience in guided implant surgery play a role in accuracy? A randomized controlled pilot study. , 2017, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[3]  Rui Figueiredo,et al.  Accuracy and the role of experience in dynamic computer guided dental implant surgery: An in-vitro study , 2018, Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal.

[4]  Sang-Hoon Kang,et al.  Verification of the usability of a navigation method in dental implant surgery: in vitro comparison with the stereolithographic surgical guide template method. , 2014, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[5]  C. Carrico,et al.  Exploring training dental implant placement using computer-guided implant navigation system for predoctoral students: A pilot study. , 2019, European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe.

[6]  George A Mandelaris,et al.  Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. , 2019, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  C. Mangano,et al.  Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: a critical review based on randomized controlled trials , 2017, BMC Oral Health.

[8]  M. Trulsson,et al.  Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  Eszter Somogyi-Ganss,et al.  Accuracy of a novel prototype dynamic computer-assisted surgery system. , 2015, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  Robert W Emery,et al.  Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance. , 2016, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[11]  Robert W Emery,et al.  Implant Placement Is More Accurate Using Dynamic Navigation. , 2017, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[12]  W. Teughels,et al.  Implant- and patient-centred outcomes of guided surgery, a 1-year follow-up: An RCT comparing guided surgery with conventional implant placement. , 2014, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[13]  V. Gopikrishna,et al.  CRIS Guidelines (Checklist for Reporting In-vitro Studies): A concept note on the need for standardized guidelines for improving quality and transparency in reporting in-vitro studies in experimental dental research , 2014, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[14]  Huey-Er Lee,et al.  Dental implant navigation system guide the surgery future , 2018, The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences.

[15]  Nils-Claudius Gellrich,et al.  Template-guided vs. non-guided drilling in site preparation of dental implants , 2014, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[16]  J. Viña-Almunia,et al.  Accuracy of Implant Placement with Computer-Guided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cadaver, Clinical, and In Vitro Studies. , 2018, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.