Streamflow simulation methods for ungauged and poorly gauged watersheds

Abstract. Rainfall–runoff modelling procedures for ungauged and poorly gauged watersheds are developed in this study. A well-established hydrological model, the University of British Columbia (UBC) watershed model, is selected and applied in five different river basins located in Canada, Cyprus, and Pakistan. Catchments from cold, temperate, continental, and semiarid climate zones are included to demonstrate the procedures developed. Two methodologies for streamflow modelling are proposed and analysed. The first method uses the UBC watershed model with a universal set of parameters for water allocation and flow routing, and precipitation gradients estimated from the available annual precipitation data as well as from regional information on the distribution of orographic precipitation. This method is proposed for watersheds without streamflow gauge data and limited meteorological station data. The second hybrid method proposes the coupling of UBC watershed model with artificial neural networks (ANNs) and is intended for use in poorly gauged watersheds which have limited streamflow measurements. The two proposed methods have been applied to five mountainous watersheds with largely varying climatic, physiographic, and hydrological characteristics. The evaluation of the applied methods is based on the combination of graphical results, statistical evaluation metrics, and normalized goodness-of-fit statistics. The results show that the first method satisfactorily simulates the observed hydrograph assuming that the basins are ungauged. When limited streamflow measurements are available, the coupling of ANNs with the regional, non-calibrated UBC flow model components is considered a successful alternative method to the conventional calibration of a hydrological model based on the evaluation criteria employed for streamflow modelling and flood frequency estimation.

[1]  A. Loukas,et al.  Integration of a Hydrological Model within a Geographical Information System: Application to a Forest Watershed , 2014 .

[2]  C. Luce.  Runoff Prediction in Ungauged Basins: Synthesis Across Processes, Places and Scales , 2014 .

[3]  A Novel Integrated Rainfall-Runoff Model Based on TOPMODEL and Artificial Neural Network , 2013 .

[4]  Paulin Coulibaly,et al.  Streamflow Prediction in Ungauged Basins: Review of Regionalization Methods , 2013 .

[5]  Robert J. Abrahart,et al.  Legitimising data-driven models: exemplification of a new data-driven mechanistic modelling framework , 2013 .

[6]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins – Part 2: Flood and low flow studies , 2013 .

[7]  G. Blöschl,et al.  Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins – Part 3: Runoff signatures in Austria , 2013 .

[8]  T. Kjeldsen,et al.  On the quest for a pan-European flood frequency distribution: Effect of scale and climate , 2013 .

[9]  J. McDonnell,et al.  A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review , 2013 .

[10]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins – Part 1: Runoff-hydrograph studies , 2013 .

[11]  R. Muñoz‐Carpena,et al.  Performance evaluation of hydrological models: Statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments , 2013 .

[12]  U. Naeem,et al.  Flow trends in river Chitral due to different scenarios of glaciated extent , 2013 .

[13]  Cecilia Svensson,et al.  Flood frequency estimation using a joint probability approach within a Monte Carlo framework , 2013 .

[14]  Jiu-fu Liu,et al.  Comparison of regionalization approaches based on regression and similarity for predictions in ungauged catchments under multiple hydro-climatic conditions , 2012 .

[15]  P. Coulibaly,et al.  Two decades of anarchy? Emerging themes and outstanding challenges for neural network river forecasting , 2012 .

[16]  M. Hafeez,et al.  Hydrology of mountainous areas in the upper Indus Basin, Northern Pakistan with the perspective of climate change , 2012, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[17]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  A review of regionalisation for continuous streamflow simulation , 2011 .

[18]  Claudio Smiraglia,et al.  Prediction of future hydrological regimes in poorly gauged high altitude basins: the case study of the upper Indus, Pakistan , 2011 .

[19]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  Convergence of approaches toward reducing uncertainty in predictions in ungauged basins , 2011 .

[20]  B. Schaefli,et al.  Integrating point glacier mass balance observations into hydrologic model identification , 2011 .

[21]  R. S. Govindaraju,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology , 2010 .

[22]  K. P. Sudheer,et al.  Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource variables in river systems: Current status and future directions , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  J. Seibert,et al.  On the value of glacier mass balances for hydrological model calibration , 2010 .

[24]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  One decade of multi-objective calibration approaches in hydrological modelling: a review , 2010 .

[25]  Dimitri Solomatine,et al.  Experimental investigation of the predictive capabilities of data driven modeling techniques in hydrology - Part 2: Application , 2009 .

[26]  Per-Olof Johansson,et al.  Temporal sampling strategies and uncertainty in calibrating a conceptual hydrological model for a small boreal catchment , 2009 .

[27]  Yongqiang Zhang,et al.  Relative merits of different methods for runoff predictions in ungauged catchments , 2009 .

[28]  Keith Beven,et al.  Gauging the ungauged basin: how many discharge measurements are needed? , 2009 .

[29]  K. P. Sudheer,et al.  RAINFALL RUNOFF MODELLING USING NEURAL NETWORKS: STATE-OF-THE-ART AND FUTURE RESEARCH NEEDS , 2009 .

[30]  Asaad Y. Shamseldin,et al.  NEARLY TWO DECADES OF NEURAL NETWORK HYDROLOGIC MODELING , 2009 .

[31]  Ashu Jain,et al.  River Flow Prediction Using an Integrated Approach , 2009 .

[32]  Sergio E. Ledesma-Orozco,et al.  Tank Model Coupled with an Artificial Neural Network , 2008, MICAI.

[33]  C. Perrin,et al.  Impact of limited streamflow data on the efficiency and the parameters of rainfall—runoff models , 2007 .

[34]  H. Assaf.  Development of an Energy-budget Snowmelt Updating Model for Incorporating Feedback from Snow Course Survey Measurements , 2007 .

[35]  Vlassios Hrissanthou,et al.  Comparative application of two mathematical models to predict sedimentation in Yermasoyia Reservoir, Cyprus , 2006 .

[36]  Young-Oh Kim,et al.  Combining Rainfall-Runoff Model Outputs for Improving Ensemble Streamflow Prediction , 2006 .

[37]  Bill Taylor,et al.  Hydrologic response to scenarios of climate change in sub watersheds of the Okanagan basin, British Columbia , 2006 .

[38]  Ronny Berndtsson,et al.  Monthly runoff simulation: Comparing and combining conceptual and neural network models , 2006 .

[39]  B. Adams,et al.  Integration of artificial neural networks with conceptual models in rainfall-runoff modeling , 2006 .

[40]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  Statistics of extremes and estimation of extreme rainfall: II. Empirical investigation of long rainfall records / Statistiques de valeurs extrêmes et estimation de précipitations extrêmes: II. Recherche empirique sur de longues séries de précipitations , 2004 .

[41]  Armando Brath,et al.  Analysis of the effects of different scenarios of historical data availability on the calibration of a spatially-distributed hydrological model , 2004 .

[42]  M. J. Hall,et al.  Rainfall-Runoff Modelling , 2004 .

[43]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Impacts of data length on optimal parameter and uncertainty estimation of a land surface model , 2004 .

[44]  François Anctil,et al.  Impact of the length of observed records on the performance of ANN and of conceptual parsimonious rainfall-runoff forecasting models , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[45]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Regionalisation of catchment model parameters , 2004 .

[46]  François Anctil,et al.  A soil moisture index as an auxiliary ANN input for stream flow forecasting , 2004 .

[47]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Rainfall-runoff modelling in gauged and ungauged catchments , 2004 .

[48]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences , 2003 .

[49]  D. Archer,et al.  Contrasting hydrological regimes in the upper Indus Basin , 2003 .

[50]  Neil McIntyre,et al.  Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall‐runoff modelling: dynamic identifiability analysis , 2003 .

[51]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Calibration of watershed models , 2003 .

[52]  L. Gottschalk,et al.  Bayesian estimation of parameters in a regional hydrological model , 2002 .

[53]  T. Kjeldsen,et al.  Comparison of regional index flood estimation procedures based on the extreme value type I distribution , 2002 .

[54]  Armando Brath,et al.  Neural networks and non-parametric methods for improving real-time flood forecasting through conceptual hydrological models , 2002 .

[55]  Asaad Y. Shamseldin,et al.  Comparison of different forms of the Multi-layer Feed-Forward Neural Network method used for river flow forecasting , 2002 .

[56]  V. Singh,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Watershed Hydrology , 2002 .

[57]  Michael C. Quick,et al.  Climate change in the Fraser River watershed: flow and temperature projections , 2002 .

[58]  C. De Michele,et al.  On the derived flood frequency distribution: analytical formulation and the influence of antecedent soil moisture condition , 2002 .

[59]  A. Loukas.  Flood frequency estimation by a derived distribution procedure , 2002 .

[60]  Alex J. Cannon,et al.  Modelling Streamflow in Present and Future Climates: Examples from the Georgia Basin, British Columbia , 2002 .

[61]  A. Loukas,et al.  Aspects of Hydrological Modelling In The Punjab Himalayan and Karakoram Ranges, Pakistan , 2002 .

[62]  Donald J. Druce,et al.  Insights from a history of seasonal inflow forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model , 2001 .

[63]  Christian W. Dawson,et al.  Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks , 2001 .

[64]  null null,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. II: Hydrologic Applications , 2000 .

[65]  Keith Beven,et al.  Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation (with likelihood based uncertainty estimation) , 2000 .

[66]  Mauro Fiorentino,et al.  Derived distribution of floods based on the concept of partial area coverage with a climatic appeal , 2000 .

[67]  L. Vasiliades,et al.  Flood producing mechanisms identification in southern British Columbia, Canada , 2000 .

[68]  M. S. Kamel.  Neural networks: the state of the art , 2000, ICM'99. Proceedings. Eleventh International Conference on Microelectronics (IEEE Cat. No.99EX388).

[69]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resource variables: a review of modelling issues and applications , 2000, Environ. Model. Softw..

[70]  Michael C. Quick,et al.  A rainfall and snowmelt runoff modelling approach to flow estimation at ungauged sites in British Columbia , 1999 .

[71]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Predicting the daily streamflow of ungauged catchments in S.E. Australia by regionalising the parameters of a lumped conceptual rainfall-runoff model , 1999 .

[72]  Bernard Bobée,et al.  Prévision hydrologique par réseaux de neurones artificiels : état de l'art , 1999 .

[73]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  The effect of internal parameters and geometry on the performance of back-propagation neural networks: an empirical study , 1998 .

[74]  Colin MacBeth,et al.  Effects of Learning Parameters on Learning Procedure and Performance of a BPNN , 1997, Neural Networks.

[75]  A. Shamseldin,et al.  Methods for combining the outputs of different rainfall–runoff models , 1997 .

[76]  Naresh Kumar,et al.  Impact assessment of climate change on the hydrological response of a snow and glacier melt runoff dominated Himalayan river , 1997 .

[77]  M. Quick,et al.  A COMPONENT BASED WATER CHEMISTRY SIMULATOR FOR SMALL SUBALPINE WATERSHEDS , 1997 .

[78]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: sensitivity to calibration data , 1996 .

[79]  A. Loukas,et al.  Spatial and temporal distribution of storm precipitation in southwestern British Columbia , 1996 .

[80]  V. Singh,et al.  Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology , 1995 .

[81]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  The UBC Watershed Model. , 1995 .

[82]  PRECIPITATION DISTRIBUTION IN COASTAL BRITISH COLUMBIA , 1994 .

[83]  J. Harlin.  Development of a Process Oriented Calibration Scheme for the HBV Hydrological Model , 1991 .

[84]  D. Burn.  Evaluation of regional flood frequency analysis with a region of influence approach , 1990 .

[85]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[86]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Evaluation of Maximum Likelihood Parameter estimation techniques for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models: Influence of calibration data variability and length on model credibility , 1983 .

[87]  Michael C. Quick,et al.  A combined snowmelt and rainfall runoff model , 1976 .

[88]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .