Landscape-scale resources promote colony growth but not reproductive performance of bumble bees.

Variation in the availability of food resources over space and time is a likely driver of how landscape structure and composition affect animal populations. Few studies, however, have directly assessed the spatiotemporal variation in resource availability that arises from landscape pattern, or its effect on populations and population dynamic parameters. We tested the effect of floral resource availability at the landscape scale on the numbers of worker, male, and queen offspring produced by bumble bee, Bombus vosnesenśkii, colonies experimentally placed within complex agricultural-natural landscapes. We quantified flower densities in all land use types at different times of the season and then used these data to calculate spatially explicit estimates of floral resources surrounding each colony. Floral availability strongly correlated with landscape structure, and different regions of the landscape showed distinct seasonal patterns of floral availability. The floral resources available in the landscape surrounding a colony positively affected the number of workers and males it produced. Production was more sensitive to early- than to later-season resources. Floral resources did not significantly affect queen production despite a strong correlation between worker number and queen number among colonies. No landscape produced high floral resources during both the early and late season, and seasonal consistency is likely required for greater queen production. Floral resources are important determinants of colony growth and likely affect the pollination services provided by bumble bees at a landscape scale. Spatiotemporal variation in floral resources across the landscape precludes a simple relationship between resources and reproductive success as measured by queens, but nonetheless likely influences the total abundance of bumble bees in our study region.

[1]  Neal M. Williams,et al.  Bees in disturbed habitats use, but do not prefer, alien plants , 2011 .

[2]  Jeffrey D. Lozier,et al.  Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Bumblebee vulnerability and conservation world-wide , 2009, Apidologie.

[4]  K. Goodell,et al.  The role of resources and risks in regulating wild bee populations. , 2011, Annual review of entomology.

[5]  H. D. Cooper,et al.  Scenarios for Global Biodiversity in the 21st Century , 2010, Science.

[6]  Roy A. Sanderson,et al.  Effects of land use at a landscape scale on bumblebee nest density and survival , 2010 .

[7]  S. Potts,et al.  Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances , 2010 .

[8]  S. E. Elliott.  Surplus Nectar Available for Subalpine Bumble Bee Colony Growth , 2009, Environmental entomology.

[9]  J. Settele,et al.  Landscape context and habitat type as drivers of bee diversity in European annual crops , 2009 .

[10]  M. Aizen,et al.  A meta-analysis of bees' responses to anthropogenic disturbance. , 2009, Ecology.

[11]  Y. Toquenaga,et al.  Do bumble bee queens choose nest sites to maximize foraging rate? Testing models of nest site selection , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  Claire Kremen,et al.  Modelling pollination services across agricultural landscapes. , 2009, Annals of botany.

[13]  Andrew P. Martin,et al.  Bumblebee nest density and the scale of available forage in arable landscapes , 2009 .

[14]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Mass flowering oilseed rape improves early colony growth but not sexual reproduction of bumblebees , 2009 .

[15]  P. Rothery,et al.  Effects of resource availability and social parasite invasion on field colonies of Bombus terrestris , 2008 .

[16]  Andrew P. Martin,et al.  Bumblebee flight distances in relation to the forage landscape. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[17]  Maj Rundlöf,et al.  Interacting effects of farming practice and landscape context on bumble bees , 2008 .

[18]  D. Goulson,et al.  Decline and conservation of bumble bees. , 2008, Annual review of entomology.

[19]  A. Bourke,et al.  Landscape context not patch size determines bumble-bee density on flower mixtures sown for agri-environment schemes , 2007, Biology Letters.

[20]  Hannah R. Gaines,et al.  Wild bee pollinators provide the majority of crop visitation across land‐use gradients in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, USA , 2007 .

[21]  Sarah S. Greenleaf,et al.  Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size , 2007, Oecologia.

[22]  N. Williams,et al.  Resource distributions among habitats determine solitary bee offspring production in a mosaic landscape. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[23]  M. Aizen,et al.  Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[24]  I. Steffan‐Dewenter,et al.  Genetic diversity and mass resources promote colony size and forager densities of a social bee (Bombus pascuorum) in agricultural landscapes , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[25]  C. Kremen,et al.  Effect of Human Disturbance on Bee Communities in a Forested Ecosystem , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[26]  Stéphane Dray,et al.  The ade4 Package-II: Two-table and K-table Methods , 2007 .

[27]  Y. Toquenaga,et al.  Estimating nest locations of bumblebee Bombus ardens from flower quality and distribution , 2007, Ecological Research.

[28]  M. Nowakowski,et al.  Comparing the efficacy of agri‐environment schemes to enhance bumble bee abundance and diversity on arable field margins , 2006 .

[29]  E. Borer,et al.  Asymmetry in community regulation: effects of predators and productivity. , 2006, Ecology.

[30]  L. Chittka,et al.  Can commercially imported bumble bees out‐compete their native conspecifics? , 2006 .

[31]  David B. Roy,et al.  Declines in forage availability for bumblebees at a national scale , 2006 .

[32]  H. Hines,et al.  Bumble Bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Diversity and Abundance in Tallgrass Prairie Patches: Effects of Local and Landscape Floral Resources , 2005 .

[33]  L. Packer,et al.  Complementary sex determination substantially increases extinction proneness of haplodiploid populations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  R. Jefferies,et al.  The dynamics of landscape change and snow geese in mid‐continent North America , 2005 .

[35]  N. Williams,et al.  Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[36]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Mechanisms Affecting Population Density in Fragmented Habitat , 2005 .

[37]  T. Sparks,et al.  Providing foraging resources for bumblebees in intensively farmed landscapes , 2005 .

[38]  D. Goulson,et al.  Use of genetic markers to quantify bumblebee foraging range and nest density , 2004 .

[39]  Neal M. Williams,et al.  The area requirements of an ecosystem service: crop pollination by native bee communities in California , 2004 .

[40]  J. Cane,et al.  Pollen nutritional content and digestibility for animals , 2000, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[41]  L. Pelletier,et al.  The effect of food supplementation on reproductive success in bumblebee field colonies , 2003 .

[42]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Mass flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale , 2003 .

[43]  Pat Willmer,et al.  LINKING BEES AND FLOWERS: HOW DO FLORAL COMMUNITIES STRUCTURE POLLINATOR COMMUNITIES? , 2003 .

[44]  Neal M. Williams,et al.  Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  A. Klein,et al.  Effects of Land‐Use Intensity in Tropical Agroforestry Systems on Coffee Flower‐Visiting and Trap‐Nesting Bees and Wasps , 2002 .

[46]  I. Williams,et al.  Bumblebees in the agricultural landscape of Estonia , 2002 .

[47]  R. Frankl,et al.  Foraging habitats and foraging distances of bumblebees, Bombus spp. (Hym., Apidae), in an agricultural landscape , 2000 .

[48]  J. Osborne,et al.  An economic model of the limits to foraging range in central place foragers with numerical solutions for bumblebees , 2000 .

[49]  R. Holt,et al.  A Survey and Overview of Habitat Fragmentation Experiments , 2000 .

[50]  Don R. Reynolds,et al.  A landscape‐scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar , 1999 .

[51]  M. Beekman,et al.  Bumblebee sex ratios: why do bumblebees produce so many males? , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  I. Williams.  Aspects of bee diversity and crop pollination in the European Union , 1996 .

[53]  L. Dill,et al.  COSTS OF ENERGY SHORTFALL FOR BUMBLE BEE COLONIES: PREDATION, SOCIAL PARASITISM, AND BROOD DEVELOPMENT , 1991, The Canadian Entomologist.

[54]  J. Osborne,et al.  Bees and the Pollination of Crops and Wild Flowers in the European Community , 1991 .

[55]  R. Plowright,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF FOOD SUPPLY ON ADULT SIZE IN THE BUMBLE BEE BOMBUS TERRICOLA KIRBY (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE) , 1988, The Canadian Entomologist.

[56]  M. Bowers.  Resource availability and timing of reproduction in bumble bee colonies (Hymenoptera: Apidae) , 1986 .

[57]  M. Bowers.  Bumble Bee Colonization, Extinction, and Reproduction in Subalpine Meadows in Northeastern Utah , 1985 .

[58]  C. Riper,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF NECTAR RESOURCES ON NESTING SUCCESS AND MOVEMENT PATTERNS OF THE COMMON AMAKIHI (HEMIGNATHUS VIRENS) , 1984 .

[59]  V. Tepedino,et al.  Spatiotemporal variation in phenology and abundance of floral resources on shortgrass prairie. , 1980 .

[60]  Bernd Heinrich,et al.  "Majoring" and "Minoring" by Foraging Bumblebees, Bombus Vagans: An Experimental Analysis , 1979 .