The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities

We argue that the current focus of the academic entrepreneurship literature, which is mostly on patent-based activities such as spinouts and licensing, should be widened to also include other informal commercial and non-commercial activities that are entrepreneurial in nature. We define as entrepreneurial any activity that occurs beyond the traditional academic roles of teaching and/or research, is innovative, carries an element of risk, and leads to financial rewards for the individual academic or his/her institution. These financial rewards can occur directly or indirectly via an increase in reputation, prestige, influence or societal benefits. Informal activities are particularly common in disciplines such as the social sciences, the creative arts and the humanities and are often overlooked by TTOs and by the academic literature. Our aim is to fill this gap by empirically analysing the determinants of academic engagement in a wider range of activities than those that are typically considered. Our findings have implications for the practice of academic entrepreneurship, and for the effectiveness of university efforts to promote entrepreneurial activities via the formal IP system and through TTOs. Our analysis is based on a recently completed survey of UK academics, providing micro-data on over 22,000 academics in the sciences, social sciences, arts and humanities. The data are complemented using institution-level information on financial and logistical support for entrepreneurial activities.

[1]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital , 2005 .

[2]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Gender Patterns of Research and Licensing Activity of Science and Engineering Faculty , 2005 .

[3]  John Browne,et al.  Securing a sustainable future for higher education : an independent review of higher education funding and student finance , 2010 .

[4]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  Analyzing the Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Implications for Entrepreneurship Education , 2005 .

[5]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  Gender Differences in Patenting in the Academic Life Sciences , 2006, Science.

[6]  W. Powell,et al.  The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity , 2003 .

[7]  Mark Casson,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Business Culture , 1995 .

[8]  Francesco Lissoni,et al.  Academic entrepreneurship, patents, and spin-offs: critical issues and lessons for Europe , 2006 .

[9]  Stephen P. Jenkins,et al.  Multivariate Probit Regression using Simulated Maximum Likelihood , 2003 .

[10]  Fiona E. Murray The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life , 2004 .

[11]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[12]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Industrial support of university research in biotechnology. , 1986, Science.

[13]  Alice Lam Knowledge Networks and Careers: Academic Scientists in Industry-University Links , 2007 .

[14]  Eóin Murphy,et al.  The Independent Review of Higher Education Funding and Student Finance , 2010 .

[15]  A. Link,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to Engage In Informal University Technology Transfer , 2007 .

[16]  Riccardo Fini,et al.  Inside or Outside the IP-System? Business Creation in Academia , 2008 .

[17]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[18]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Opening the ivory tower's door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of U.S. university spin-off companies , 2005 .

[19]  Michael Kitson,et al.  Knowledge exchange between academics and the business, public and third sectors , 2009 .

[20]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[21]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university , 2008 .

[22]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences1 , 2006, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Nabil Amara,et al.  Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities , 2006 .

[24]  A. Stevens The Enactment of Bayh–Dole , 2004 .

[25]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry , 2007 .

[26]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[27]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Ivory tower and industrial innovation : university-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States , 2004 .

[28]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[29]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[30]  William Bains,et al.  How academics can make (extra) money out of their science , 2005, Journal of commercial biotechnology.

[31]  S. Shane A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus , 2003 .

[32]  T. Allen,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities , 2005 .

[33]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[34]  R. Geiger Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since World War II , 1994 .

[35]  Scott Shane,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation , 2004 .

[36]  Richard A. Jensen,et al.  University-Industry Spillovers, Government Funding, and Industrial Consulting , 2010 .

[37]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Relationships between academic institutions and industry in the life sciences--an industry survey. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  H. Etzkowitz Research groups as ???quasi-firms???: the invention of the entrepreneurial university , 2003 .

[39]  Mike Wright,et al.  From Human Capital to Social Capital: A Longitudinal Study of Technology–Based Academic Entrepreneurs , 2007 .

[40]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  Divergent paths to commercial science: A comparison of scientists' founding and advising activities , 2011 .

[41]  Mike Wright,et al.  University Spin-Out Companies and Venture Capital , 2006 .

[42]  Geoffrey Boulton,et al.  What are universities for? , 2011 .

[43]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  WHO'S PATENTING IN THE UNIVERSITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS , 2007 .

[44]  H. Etzkowitz The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages , 1998 .

[45]  Andrea Vezzulli,et al.  If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world , 2007 .

[46]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[47]  Philip Ternouth,et al.  Universities, business and knowledge exchange , 2008 .

[48]  W. Powell,et al.  To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer , 2001 .

[49]  Magnus Klofsten,et al.  Comparing Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe – The Case of Sweden and Ireland , 2000 .

[50]  S. Breschi,et al.  THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY OF ACADEMIC INVENTORS: NEW EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN DATA , 2007 .

[51]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences , 1998 .

[52]  A. Geuna,et al.  University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .

[53]  D. E. Stokes Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[54]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Entrepreneurs in high technology : lessons from MIT and beyond , 1991 .

[55]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Research Productivity over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists , 1991 .

[56]  Laurel Smith-Doerr,et al.  Gender and Commercial Science: Women’s Patenting in the Life Sciences , 2005 .

[57]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[58]  David B. Balkin,et al.  Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer , 2005 .

[59]  Mike Wright,et al.  Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies , 2005 .

[60]  M. Perkmann,et al.  Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations , 2009 .

[61]  Scott Shane,et al.  Bringing individuals back in: the effects of career experience on new firm founding , 2003 .

[62]  Yuan-Chieh Chang,et al.  The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective , 2009 .

[63]  Israel M. Kirzner Competition and Entrepreneurship , 1973 .

[64]  M. Mars,et al.  Academic entrepreneurship (re)defined: significance and implications for the scholarship of higher education , 2010 .

[65]  T. Allen,et al.  Delineating the Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial University: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Experience , 2007 .

[66]  Michael A. Stoto,et al.  Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors Among Life Scientists , 1989 .

[67]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  ACADEMIC INCENTIVES, RESEARCH ORGANIZATION AND PATENTING AT A LARGE FRENCH UNIVERSITY , 2007 .

[68]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  The Determinants of Faculty Patenting Behavior: Demographics or Opportunities? , 2005 .

[69]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: 'The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with' , 2003 .

[70]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  The entrepreneurial puzzle: explaining the gender gap , 2006 .

[71]  Fiona Murray,et al.  Buying science and selling science: gender differences in the market for commercial science , 2007 .

[72]  A. Link,et al.  Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. , 2004 .

[73]  Gerard George,et al.  Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity , 2009 .

[74]  Paul M. Swamidass,et al.  Why university inventions rarely produce income? Bottlenecks in university technology transfer , 2009 .