A methodological framework for modeling pavement maintenance costs for projects with performance-based contracts

OF THE DISSERTATION A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR MODELING PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR PROJECTS WITH PERFORMANCE-BASED CONTRACTS by Kamalesh Panthi Florida International University, 2009 Miami, Florida Professor Syed M. Ahmed, Major Professor Performance-based maintenance contracts differ significantly from material and method-based contracts that have been traditionally used to maintain roads. Road agencies around the world have moved towards a performance-based contract approach because it offers several advantages like cost saving, better budgeting certainty, better customer satisfaction with better road services and conditions. Payments for the maintenance of road are explicitly linked to the contractor successfully meeting certain clearly defined minimum performance indicators in these contracts. Quantitative evaluation of the cost of performance-based contracts has several difficulties due to the complexity of the pavement deterioration process. Based on a probabilistic analysis of failures of achieving multiple performance criteria over the length of the contract period, an effort has been made to develop a model that is capable of estimating the cost of these performance-based contracts. One of the essential functions of such model is to predict performance of the pavement as accurately as possible. Prediction of future degradation of pavement is done using Markov Chain Process, which requires estimating transition

[1]  Kelvin C. P. Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Behavior of Pavements , 1994 .

[2]  Mehmet E. Ozbek,et al.  Development of Performance Warranties for Performance-Based Road Maintenance Contracts , 2004 .

[3]  Mehmet E. Ozbek,et al.  Sampling Procedure for Performance-Based Road Maintenance Evaluations , 2008 .

[4]  Seosamh B. Costello,et al.  Derivation of Transition Probability Matrices for Pavement Deterioration Modeling , 2006 .

[5]  C Parkman,et al.  PAVEMENT DETERIORATION MODELLING IN LONG TERM PERFORMANCE BASED CONTRACTS: HOW FAR DOES IT MITIGATE THE RISK FOR CLIENT AND CONTRACTOR? , 2003 .

[6]  Hao Zhou,et al.  Stochastic Modeling for Pavement Warranty Cost Estimation , 2009 .

[7]  A P Chassiakos,et al.  Information management in a decision support system for pavement management , 2001 .

[8]  Kamalesh Panthi,et al.  A Framework to Assess Sustainability of Community-based Water Projects Using Multi-Criteria Analysis , 2008 .

[9]  George Morcous,et al.  LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES , 2002 .

[10]  Kent Joseph Kostuk Quantifying the Uncertainty Associated with Long Term Maintenance Contracts , 2003 .

[11]  Samer Madanat,et al.  Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data , 1995 .

[12]  Samuel Labi,et al.  Life Cycle Cost Analysis for INDOT Pavement Design Procedures , 2005 .

[13]  Ivan Damnjanovic A risk -based approach to modeling life -cycle costs associated with warranty specifications for transportation infrastructure , 2006 .

[14]  Mark A. Turnquist,et al.  Optimization Modeling for Enhanced Network-Level Pavement Management System , 1996 .

[15]  J. C. Piñero,et al.  A Framework for Monitoring Performance-Based Road Maintenance , 2003 .

[16]  Samuel H Carpenter,et al.  PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE PREDICTION MODEL USING THE MARKOV PROCESS , 1987 .

[17]  Samuel Labi,et al.  Effectiveness of Highway Pavement Seal Coating Treatments , 2004 .

[18]  B. Ayyub Risk Analysis in Engineering and Economics , 2003 .

[19]  R L Lytton Concepts of pavement performance prediction and modelling , 1987 .

[20]  K P George,et al.  PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS , 1990 .

[21]  Dulcy M. Abraham,et al.  Application of dynamic programming and simulation for sewer management , 2003 .

[22]  Kamalesh Panthi,et al.  Application of Quality Tools to Improve Quality: A Case Study of a Building Remediation Contractor , 2008 .

[23]  Konstantinos P. Triantis,et al.  Development of a Comprehensive Framework for the Efficiency Measurement of Road Maintenance Strategies using Data Envelopment Analysis , 2009 .

[24]  D A Mangan,et al.  RISK ISSUES IN PERFORMANCE-SPECIFIED FLEXIBLE PAVING CONTRACTS , 1998 .

[25]  Mehmet Emre Bayraktar,et al.  State-of-Practice of Warranty Contracting in the United States , 2004 .

[26]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  Recent developments and potential future directions in ranking and optimization procedures for pavement management , 1987 .

[27]  Natalya Stankevich,et al.  Performance-based contracting for preservation and improvement of road assets , 2009 .

[28]  George Morcous,et al.  Maintenance optimization of infrastructure networks using genetic algorithms , 2005 .

[29]  Samuel H Carpenter,et al.  APPLICATION OF MARKOV PROCESS TO PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AT NETWORK LEVEL , 1994 .

[30]  Kamal Golabi,et al.  A Statewide Pavement Management System , 1982 .

[31]  John P Zaniewski,et al.  Modern Pavement Management , 1994 .

[32]  J S Russell,et al.  GUIDELINES FOR WARRANTY, MULTI-PARAMETER, AND BEST VALUE CONTRACTING , 2001 .

[33]  Cesar Queiroz Contractual Procedures to Involve the Private Sector in Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation , 1999 .

[34]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Contingency Estimation for Construction Projects Through Risk Analysis , 2009 .

[35]  Kumares C. Sinha,et al.  OPTIMAL PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT APPROACH USING ROUGHNESS MEASUREMENTS , 1985 .

[36]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  RISK CONSIDERATIONS IN FINANCIAL PLANNING FOR PAVEMENT REHABILITATION , 1988 .

[37]  Qingbin Cui,et al.  Long-term warranties on highway projects. , 2008 .