Life cycle inherent toxicity: a novel LCA-based algorithm for evaluating chemical synthesis pathways

Green chemistry has long called for a life cycle approach in designing and assessing new syntheses. In evaluating hazardous chemical use, most green chemistry metrics only consider those chemicals directly associated with the synthesis and miss upstream hazards that can contribute to or even dominate overall impacts when evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA). Conversely, LCA metrics are wholly dependent on emissions and do not capture potential risks posed by inherently hazardous chemicals. Life cycle inherent toxicity i* is a proposed novel metric that adapts the computational framework of LCA by attaching measures of inherent hazard to the intermediate chemical flows, rather than considering only emissions. Thus, it captures toxicity associated with the entire cradle-to-gate of a chemical, rather than just direct chemical inputs into a synthesis, and is a function of upstream use of hazardous chemicals, rather than only emissions. Values of i* are calculated for 181 organic chemicals from the ecoinvent LCI database. Statistical testing revealed no significant correlation between life cycle inherent toxicity and conventional toxicity, suggesting that the proposed metric provides novel information that can be used in conjunction with current green chemistry metrics. Outliers are investigated where the target chemical is much more toxic than its upstream building blocks (e.g., phosgene) and, conversely, where upstream chemical toxicity dominates (e.g., aniline). Values of i* are weakly correlated with values of conventional life cycle toxicity from the USEtox LCIA model, again suggesting that the new metric provides additional knowledge. A similar computational approach can be applied to examine other types of chemical hazards, such as corrosivity.

[1]  David J. C. Constable,et al.  Metrics to ‘green’ chemistry—which are the best? , 2002 .

[2]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Ex-ante environmental assessments of novel technologies - Improved caprolactam catalysis and hydrogen storage , 2011 .

[3]  Paul T. Anastas,et al.  Life-Cycle Approaches for Assessing Green Chemistry Technologies , 2002 .

[4]  Volker Hessel,et al.  Life cycle assessment for the direct synthesis of adipic acid in microreactors and benchmarking to the commercial process , 2013 .

[5]  M. Pera‐Titus,et al.  Hexamethylenediamine (HMDA) from fossil- vs. bio-based routes: an economic and life cycle assessment comparative study , 2015 .

[6]  P. Anastas,et al.  Green Chemistry , 2018, Environmental Science.

[7]  Concepción Jiménez-González,et al.  Fast life cycle assessment of synthetic chemistry (FLASC™) tool , 2007 .

[8]  Pietro Tundo,et al.  The chemistry of dimethyl carbonate. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[9]  H Scott Matthews,et al.  Categorization of Scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon footprinting. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Paul Anastas,et al.  Green chemistry: principles and practice. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[11]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Structure and dynamics of molecular networks: A novel paradigm of drug discovery. A comprehensive review , 2012, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[12]  Paul T. Anastas,et al.  Life cycle assessment and green chemistry: the yin and yang of industrial ecology , 2000 .

[13]  Alexei Lapkin,et al.  Green chemistry metrics: measuring and monitoring sustainable processes , 2008 .

[14]  Jane C. Bare,et al.  TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0 , 2011 .

[15]  B. Trost,et al.  The atom economy--a search for synthetic efficiency. , 1991, Science.

[16]  Peter J. Dunn,et al.  Green chemistry tools to influence a medicinal chemistry and research chemistry based organisation , 2008 .

[17]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment , 2014, Science.

[18]  B. Grzybowski,et al.  Rewiring chemistry: algorithmic discovery and experimental validation of one-pot reactions in the network of organic chemistry. , 2012, Angewandte Chemie.

[19]  Joan Rieradevall,et al.  How green is a chemical reaction? Application of LCA to green chemistry. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Masahiko Arai,et al.  Synthesis of dimethyl carbonate and glycols from carbon dioxide, epoxides, and methanol using heterogeneous basic metal oxide catalysts with high activity and selectivity , 2001 .

[21]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Life cycle assessment in green chemistry , 2006 .

[22]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fine chemical production: a case study of pharmaceutical synthesis , 2010 .

[23]  James H. Clark,et al.  Towards a holistic approach to metrics for the 21st century pharmaceutical industry , 2015 .

[24]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  The computational structure of life cycle assessment , 2002 .

[25]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  On the usefulness of life cycle assessment in early chemical methodology development: the case of organophosphorus-catalyzed Appel and Wittig reactions† , 2013 .

[26]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Drug—target network , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  Michaelangelo D. Tabone,et al.  Sustainability metrics: life cycle assessment and green design in polymers. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  B. Grzybowski,et al.  Parallel optimization of synthetic pathways within the network of organic chemistry. , 2012, Angewandte Chemie.

[29]  J. Sanders,et al.  A limited LCA of bio‐adipic acid: Manufacturing the nylon‐6,6 precursor adipic acid using the benzoic acid degradation pathway from different feedstocks , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[30]  Concepción Jiménez-González,et al.  The evolution of life cycle assessment in pharmaceutical and chemical applications – a perspective , 2014 .

[31]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[32]  Andreas Kicherer,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis by basf: the method , 2002 .

[33]  John Andraos,et al.  On Using Tree Analysis to Quantify the Material, Input Energy, and Cost Throughput Efficiencies of Simple and Complex Synthesis Plans and Networks: Towards a Blueprint for Quantitative Total Synthesis and Green Chemistry , 2006 .

[34]  Concepción Jiménez-González,et al.  Expanding GSK's solvent selection guide ― embedding sustainability into solvent selection starting at medicinal chemistry , 2011 .

[35]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  New perspectives on nanomaterial aquatic ecotoxicity: production impacts exceed direct exposure impacts for carbon nanotoubes. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  M. Reuter,et al.  Process Knowledge, System Dynamics, and Metal Ecology , 2004 .

[37]  K. Blok,et al.  Producing bio-based bulk chemicals using industrial biotechnology saves energy and combats climate change. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.