Advancing integrated STEM learning through engineering design: Sixth-grade students’ design and construction of earthquake resistant buildings

ABSTRACT As part of a 3-year longitudinal study, 136 sixth-grade students completed an engineering-based problem on earthquakes involving integrated STEM learning. Students employed engineering design processes and STEM disciplinary knowledge to plan, sketch, then construct a building designed to withstand earthquake damage, taking into account a number of constraints. On testing, students redesigned to build an improved structure. Using a framework of design processes, we report on the students' capabilities in planning, creating annotated sketches, and transforming these into 3D models. An understanding of core STEM concepts was apparent in their responses, including shape properties, stability, rigidity, balance, strength, and engineering techniques. Group problem solving involved moving iteratively between design phases, frequently revisiting problem scoping, being cognizant of the problem goal, boundaries and constraints, and appreciating design sketches as guiding constructions. Students were also observed to consider a number of problem components simultaneously, indicating their capabilities in handling the complexity of the task.

[1]  Aran W. Glancy,et al.  A Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education: Research and Development , 2014 .

[2]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[3]  Robin Adams,et al.  The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix , 2012 .

[4]  Joakim Juhl,et al.  Representations and Visual Synthesis in Engineering Design , 2013 .

[5]  S. Levy.  Young children’s learning of water physics by constructing working systems , 2013 .

[6]  Amy Orange,et al.  An Evaluation of HigherEd 2.0 Technologies in Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Courses. , 2012 .

[7]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Iterative Refinement Cycles for Videotape Analyses of Conceptual Change , 2000 .

[8]  Guy Claxton,et al.  Thinking Like an Engineer: Implications for the education system. , 2014 .

[9]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[10]  Demetra Evangelou,et al.  Practicing engineering while building with blocks: identifying engineering thinking , 2016 .

[11]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Designers : the key to successful product development , 1998 .

[12]  Tamara J. Moore,et al.  Engineering in Early Elementary Classrooms Through the Integration of High-Quality Literature, Design, and STEM+C Content , 2018 .

[13]  Shaobo Huang,et al.  High School Student Engineering Design Thinking and Performance , 2012 .

[14]  Ken Yasuhara,et al.  Breadth in Problem Scoping: a Comparison of Freshman and Senior Engineering Students* , 2008 .

[15]  Léonie J. Rennie,et al.  Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Reflections, and Ways Forward. Teaching and Learning in Science Series. , 2012 .

[16]  M. Kathleen Heid.  Learning Important Mathematics From Contextualization and Networked Collaboration—A Review of The SimCalc Vision and Contributions: Democratizing Access to Important Mathematics , 2015 .

[17]  M. J. French.  Engineering design in education , 1980 .

[18]  Robin Adams,et al.  What Does it Mean to Design? A Qualitative Investigation of Design Professionals' Experiences , 2012 .

[19]  David A. Gillam,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .

[20]  Luis Moreno-Armella,et al.  Intersecting representation and communication infrastructures , 2009 .

[21]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research , 2014 .

[22]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[23]  Ngss Lead States.  Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[24]  Donna S. Reese,et al.  Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research , 2014 .

[25]  Gina Navoa Svarovsky,et al.  Capturing the Design Thinking of Young Children Interacting with a Parent , 2014 .

[26]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Thinking with Sketches , 2009 .

[27]  Monica E. Cardella,et al.  Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices , 2014 .

[28]  Grady Venville,et al.  Exploring Curriculum Integration: Why Integrate? , 2012 .

[29]  Lyn D. English,et al.  STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration , 2016, International Journal of STEM Education.

[30]  N. Cross.  Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[31]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators , 2006 .

[32]  Marilyn Fleer,et al.  Working Technologically: Investigations into How Young Children Design and Make During Technology Education , 2000 .

[33]  David Hammer,et al.  Examining Young Students' Problem Scoping in Engineering Design. , 2014 .

[34]  Thomas F. Shipley,et al.  Drawing on Experience: How Domain Knowledge Is Reflected in Sketches of Scientific Structures and Processes , 2014, Research in Science Education.

[35]  Christine M. Cunningham,et al.  ENGINEERING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS , 2014 .

[36]  John Orr,et al.  Curriculum Development And Integration For K 6 Engineering Education , 2007 .

[37]  Aran W. Glancy,et al.  Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education , 2014 .

[38]  Aditya Johri,et al.  Contextual Constraining of Student Design Practices , 2015 .

[39]  Christine M. Cunningham,et al.  DESIGNING ENGINEERING EXPERIENCES TO ENGAGE ALL STUDENTS , 2014 .

[40]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Insights on Designers’ Sketching Activities in New Product Design Teams , 2004 .

[41]  Brenda J. Gustafson,et al.  The Role of Design Drawing among Children Engaged in a Parachute Building Activity. , 2004 .

[42]  James H. Wandersee,et al.  It's "Your" Fault!: An Investigation into Earthquakes, Plate Tectonics, and Geologic Time. , 2011 .

[43]  Hilary Asoko.  Re/Constructing elementary science , 2003 .

[44]  M. David Burghardt,et al.  Informed Design: A Contemporary Approach to Design Pedagogy as the Core Process in Technology: In Classroom Settings Most Problems Are Usually Well Defined, So Students Have Little Experience with Open-Ended Problems , 2004 .

[45]  John Wallace,et al.  The Wheels of the Bus: Children designing in an early years classroom , 2000 .

[46]  Matthew M. Mehalik,et al.  Middle‐School Science Through Design‐Based Learning versus Scripted Inquiry: Better Overall Science Concept Learning and Equity Gap Reduction , 2008 .

[47]  Ron Mochinski,et al.  Office of the Chief Scientist , 2015 .

[48]  Lyn D. English,et al.  Engineering design in the primary school: applying stem concepts to build an optical instrument , 2016 .

[49]  John R. Wright,et al.  Virtual Reality Robotic Programming Software in the Technology Classroom , 2004 .

[50]  Bill Lucas,et al.  Thinking Like an Engineer: Using Engineering Habits of Mind and Signature Pedagogies to Redesign Engineering Education , 2016, Int. J. Eng. Pedagog..

[51]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[52]  K. Charmaz,et al.  The sage handbook of grounded theory , 2007 .

[53]  Heejun Lim,et al.  The Strategic Thinking of Novice Designers: Discontinuity between Theory and Practice. , 2000 .

[54]  Ann F. McKenna,et al.  Adaptive expertise and knowledge fluency in design and innovation , 2014 .

[55]  Judith S. Zawojewski,et al.  Models and Modeling in Engineering Education: Designing Experiences for All Students , 2008 .

[56]  Demetra Evangelou,et al.  Talking about Artifacts: Preschool Children's Explorations with Sketches, Stories, and Tangible Objects. , 2010 .

[57]  Jo Anne Vasquez,et al.  STEM Lesson Essentials, Grades 3-8: Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics , 2013 .

[58]  Matthew Harrison.  Jobs and growth: the importance of engineering skills to the UK economy , 2012 .

[59]  Angela Anning,et al.  Drawing Out Ideas: Graphicacy and Young Children , 1997 .

[60]  Jay B. Labov,et al.  STEM Learning Is Everywhere: Summary of a Convocation on Building Learning Systems , 2014 .

[61]  Lyn D. English,et al.  STEM learning through engineering design: fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace , 2015 .

[62]  Marc J. de Vries,et al.  The effect of iteration on the design performance of primary school children , 2015 .

[63]  Demetra Evangelou,et al.  Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: the teacher's experience , 2015 .

[64]  A. Gagatsis,et al.  The role of gestures in making connections between space and shape aspects and their verbal representations in the early years: findings from a case study , 2014 .

[65]  Murat Akkuş.  The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics , 2015 .

[66]  Morgan M. Hynes,et al.  The Humanistic Side of Engineering: Considering Social Science and Humanities Dimensions of Engineering in Education and Research , 2013 .

[67]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Re/Constructing Elementary Science , 2001 .

[68]  Monica F. Cox,et al.  An Overview of the Literature: Research in P-12 Engineering Education , 2012 .

[69]  Christine M. Cunningham,et al.  Engineering Concepts, Practices, and Trajectories for Early Childhood Education , 2018 .

[70]  Nathan Mentzer,et al.  Engineering design thinking: High school students' performance and knowledge , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL).

[71]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  Design Heuristics in Engineering Concept Generation , 2012 .