Contrast Sensitivity during Horizontal Visual Pursuit: Dynamic Sensitivity Functions

The contrast sensitivity functions of college students for grating targets presented at angular velocities of 0, 30, 60, and 90 deg s−1 were determined for target durations of 200 and 600 ms. The most pronounced effects of target movement were evident at the mid to high spatial frequencies in which sensitivity was markedly reduced as velocity increased. These adverse effects were greatest in the 200 ms condition, in which performance was largely limited to the saccadic eye movement system. In the 600 ms condition, in which both saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements were possible, contrast sensitivity for the low-frequency target actually improved significantly for the 30 and 60 deg s−1 targets, whereas only adverse effects of target motion were found for targets of mid and high spatial frequencies. The results are discussed in terms of the limitations of traditional visual assessment procedures and the practical and theoretical benefits of conceptualizing the joint effects of target composition and target movement.

[1]  G M Long,et al.  Training Effects on the Resolution of Moving Targets—Dynamic Visual Acuity , 1989, Human factors.

[2]  B Brown,et al.  The effect of target contrast variation on dynamic visual acuity and eye movements. , 1972, Vision research.

[3]  Brian J. Murphy,et al.  Pattern thresholds for moving and stationary gratings during smooth eye movement , 1978, Vision Research.

[4]  A. Burg,et al.  Dynamic visual acuity as related to age, sex, and static acuity. , 1961 .

[5]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  A. Ginsburg,et al.  Contrast sensitivity predicts pilots' performance in aircraft simulators. , 1982, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[7]  M. Banks,et al.  The development of basic mechanisms of pattern vision: spatial frequency channels. , 1985, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[8]  Janette Atkinson,et al.  Channels in Vision: Basic Aspects , 1978 .

[9]  G M Long,et al.  Dynamic Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity for Static and Flickered Gratings in a College Sample , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[10]  Andrew V. Barber.  Visual Mechanisms and Predictors of Far Field Visual Task Performance , 1990 .

[11]  B Brown,et al.  Dynamic visual acuity, eye movements and peripheral acuity for moving targets. , 1972, Vision research.

[12]  J N Trachtman.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OCULAR MOTILITIES AND BATTING AVERAGE IN LITTLE LEAGUERS* , 1973, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[13]  J. Sharpe,et al.  Effect of aging on horizontal smooth pursuit. , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  A M Mayyasi,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BASKETBALL SHOOTING PERFORMANCE AND CERTAIN VISUAL ATTRIBUTES* , 1971, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  M. Rouse,et al.  Dynamic visual acuity: a review. , 1981, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[16]  A. Ginsburg,et al.  Contrast Sensitivity Predicts Age-Related Differences in Highway-Sign Discriminability , 1985, Human factors.

[17]  D. H. Kelly.  Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[18]  R. Blake.  Cat spatial vision , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  C. Falkowitz.  The role of visual skills in batting averages , 1977 .

[20]  Henry A. Knoll,et al.  A Preliminary Study of Dynamic Visual Acuity and its Effects in Motorists‘ Vision , 1958 .

[21]  S N Roscoe,et al.  Eye accommodation to head-up virtual images. , 1988, Human factors.

[22]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood , 1982, Vision Research.

[23]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Human smooth and saccadic eye movements during voluntary pursuit of different target motions on different backgrounds. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  A P Ginsburg,et al.  A New Contrast Sensitivity Vision Test Chart , 1984, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[25]  L Schalén,et al.  Quantification of tracking eye movements in normal subjects. , 1980, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[26]  J. Robson.  Spatial and Temporal Contrast-Sensitivity Functions of the Visual System , 1966 .

[27]  A. Burg.  Visual acuity as measured by dynamic and static tests: a comparative evaluation. , 1966, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  H T Whiting,et al.  Dynamic visual acuity and performance in a catching task. , 1974, Journal of motor behavior.

[29]  J W MILLER,et al.  Dynamic visual acuity in an applied setting. , 1959, Aerospace medicine.

[30]  G M Long,et al.  Training Effects on Dynamic Visual Acuity with Free-Head Viewing , 1991, Perception.

[31]  D. Robinson,et al.  The upper limit of human smooth pursuit velocity , 1985, Vision Research.

[32]  Ronald N. Wentworth,et al.  Presentation Effects and Eye-Motion Behaviors in Dynamic Visual Inspection , 1982, Human factors.

[33]  E. Ludvigh,et al.  Study of visual acuity during the ocular pursuit of moving test objects. I. Introduction. , 1958, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[34]  K W Gish,et al.  Visual Control of Displacement at Slow Speeds , 1988, Human factors.

[35]  GERALD M. LONG,et al.  Reliabilities of Alternate Measures of Contrast Sensitivity Functions , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[36]  G. Legge.  Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial properties , 1978, Vision Research.

[37]  D. Robinson.  The mechanics of human smooth pursuit eye movement. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  D. Regan.  Visual information channeling in normal and disordered vision. , 1982, Psychological review.

[39]  G. M. Long,et al.  The nature and basis of age-related changes in dynamic visual acuity. , 1990, Psychology and aging.

[40]  G. M. Long,et al.  The Effects of Target Wavelength on Dynamic Visual Acuity under Photopic and Scotopic Viewing , 1988, Human factors.

[41]  A V Barber.  Visual Mechanisms and Predictors of Far Field Visual Task Performance , 1990, Human factors.

[42]  E. Ludvigh,et al.  The effect of relative motion on visual acuity. , 1962, Survey of ophthalmology.

[43]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  Oculomotor responses to step-ramp targets by young human infants , 1990, Vision Research.

[44]  D. Uhlrich,et al.  Cross-species correspondence of spatial contrast sensitivity functions , 1981, Behavioural Brain Research.

[45]  Beals Rp,et al.  The relationship between basketball shooting performance and certain visual attributes. , 1971 .

[46]  J HOOGERHEIDE,et al.  THE DYNAMIC VISUAL ACUITY OF 30 SELECTED PILOTS. , 1963, Aeromedica acta.