Image restoration in computed tomography: the spatially invariant point spread function

Image restoration to deblur smoothing caused by the finite-size X-ray beam profile for a simulated computed tomography (CT) system is presented. Three simple image restoration methods are compared when the point-spread-function (PSF) is spatially invariant. In the first restoration method, an iterative least squares solution, regularized with the image norm and constrained by the boundary of the object, is obtained from the projection data. In the second method, a Wiener filter, designed using the power spectrum of CT noise, is applied to the reconstructed CT image. The third method obtains a weighted least-squares solution, by iteration, from the reconstructed CT image; the solution is regularized with the weighted image norm. Restored images were compared with the image obtained using filtered backprojection method. Differences between these images were evaluated qualitatively.

[2]  Thomas R. Overton,et al.  Image restoration in computed tomography: estimation of the spatially variant point spread function , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[3]  Thomas R. Overton,et al.  Image restoration in computed tomography: restoration of experimental CT images , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[4]  Gabor T. Herman,et al.  Mathematical Aspects of Computerized Tomography , 1981, Lecture Notes in Medical Informatics.

[5]  M F Kijewski,et al.  The noise power spectrum of CT images. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  R. Mersereau,et al.  Iterative methods for image deblurring , 1990 .

[7]  J. Verly.  Collimator Effects in High Resolution X-Ray Computed Tomography , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  B. F. Logan,et al.  The Fourier reconstruction of a head section , 1974 .

[9]  O. Nalcioglu,et al.  Constrained Iterative Reconstruction by the Conjugate Gradient Method , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  K Faulkner,et al.  Analysis of x-ray computed tomography images using the noise power spectrum and autocorrelation function. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Kenneth M. Hanson,et al.  Method of evaluating image-recovery algorithms based on task performance , 1990 .

[12]  J. Verly.  X-ray computed tomography in the presence of arbitrary symmetrical focal spot intensity distributions. , 1980, Medical physics.

[13]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Digital Picture Processing , 1976 .

[14]  M A King,et al.  Characterization of the modulation transfer function of discrete filtered backprojection. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[15]  G. N. Ramachandran,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction from radiographs and electron micrographs: application of convolutions instead of Fourier transforms. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  R. Bracewell.  Correction for Collimator Width (Restoration) in Reconstructive X‐Ray Tomography , 1977, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  Reginald L. Lagendijk,et al.  Regularized iterative image restoration with ringing reduction , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[18]  R. Bracewell,et al.  Blurring in Tomograms Made with X‐Ray Beams of Finite Width , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  P M Joseph,et al.  The effects of sampling on CT images. , 1980, Computerized tomography.

[20]  S S Kuo,et al.  Resolution enhancement of tomographic images using the row action projection method. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[21]  Joel Weisman,et al.  Introduction to optimization theory , 1973 .