Analysis of force profile during a maximum voluntary isometric contraction task

This study analyses maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and its measurement by recording the force profile during maximal‐effort, 7‐s hand‐grip contractions. Six healthy subjects each performed three trials repeated at short intervals to study variation from fatigue. These three trials were performed during three separate sessions at daily intervals to look at random variation. A pattern of force development during a trial was identified. An initiation phase, with or without an initiation peak, was followed by a maintenance phase, sometimes with secondary pulses and an underlying decline in force. Of these three MVIC parameters, maximum force during the maintenance phase showed less random variability compared to intertrial fatigue variability than did maximum force during the initiation phase or absolute maximum force. Analysis of MVIC as a task, rather than a single, maximal value reveals deeper levels of motor control in its generation. Thus, force parameters other than the absolute maximum force may be better suited to quantification of muscle performance in health and disease. Muscle Nerve 29: 401–408, 2004

[1]  J. F. Yang,et al.  Electromyography reliability in maximal and submaximal isometric contractions. , 1983, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  D. Vicario,et al.  The control of rapid limb movement in the cat II. Scaling of isometric force adjustments , 1978, Experimental brain research.

[4]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Organizing principles for single-joint movements. IV. Implications for isometric contractions. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  P. Stratford,et al.  A comparison of make and break tests using a hand-held dynamometer and the Kin-Com. , 1994, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[6]  D Tortopidis,et al.  The variability of bite force measurement between sessions, in different positions within the dental arch. , 1998, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[7]  M. Swash,et al.  Reproducibility of neurophysiological and myometric measurement in the ulnar nerve–abductor digiti minimi system , 2001, Muscle & nerve.

[8]  G. Karst,et al.  Influence of joint position on electromyographic and torque generation during maximal voluntary isometric contractions of the hamstrings and gluteus maximus muscles. , 2001, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[9]  D. Sale,et al.  Postactivation Potentiation: Role in Human Performance , 2002, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[10]  W. C. Beasley.  Quantitative muscle testing: principles and applications to research and clinical services. , 1961, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  O. Rutherford,et al.  Changes in muscle strength, relaxation rate and fatiguability during the human menstrual cycle. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  J Perry,et al.  EMG-force relationships in skeletal muscle. , 1981, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[13]  Matthias Keidel,et al.  Relationship between electrical and vibratory output of muscle during voluntary contraction and fatigue , 1991, Muscle & nerve.

[14]  A. Jaskólska,et al.  The influence of elbow joint angle on different phases of force development during maximal voluntary contraction. , 2000, Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee.

[15]  R. Patterson,et al.  Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: reliability for upper and lower extremities. , 1987, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  Y Yamazaki,et al.  Relationship between force and electromyographic activity during rapid isometric contraction in power grip. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  J. Petajan,et al.  Reliability of maximal voluntary isometric contraction testing in a multicenter study of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 1997, Muscle & nerve.

[18]  Josef Kollmitzer,et al.  Reliability of surface electromyographic measurements , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  G J Wilson,et al.  The Use of Isometric Tests of Muscular Function in Athletic Assessment , 1996, Sports medicine.

[20]  Beasley Wc.  Quantitative muscle testing: principles and applications to research and clinical services. , 1961 .

[21]  Sharon L Olson,et al.  Test-retest strength reliability: hand-held dynamometry in community-dwelling elderly fallers. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  T L Munsat,et al.  Quantitative motor assessment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 1986, Neurology.

[23]  J. Duchateau,et al.  Effect of time of day on force variation in a human muscle , 1999, Muscle & nerve.

[24]  A M Jette,et al.  Moderate exercise improves gait stability in disabled elders. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  D. Whitteridge.  Movements of the eyes R. H. S. Carpenter, Pion Ltd, London (1977), 420 pp., $27.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Swash,et al.  Consensus guidelines for the design and implementation of clinical trials in ALS , 1999, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[27]  R W Bohannon,et al.  Hand-held dynamometry: factors influencing reliability and validity. , 1997, Clinical rehabilitation.

[28]  Les G Carlton,et al.  Modeling Variability of Force During Isometric Contractions of the Quadriceps Femoris , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.