A beam-matching concept for medical linear accelerators

The flexibility in radiotherapy can be improved if a patient can be moved between any one of the department's medical linear accelerators without the need to change anything in the patient's treatment plan. For this to be possible, the dosimetric characteristics of the various accelerators must be the same, or nearly the same i.e. the accelerators must be beam-matched. During a period of nine months, eight Varian iX accelerators with 6 and 15 MV photon beams and 6–18 MeV electron beams (only four of the eight) were installed at our clinic. All accelerators fulfilled the vendor-defined “fine beam-match” criteria, and a more extensive set of measurements was carried out during commissioning. The measured absorbed dose data for each accelerator were compared with the first accelerator, chosen as reference, and the TPS calculations. Two of the eight accelerators showed a larger discrepancy for the 15 MV beam not revealed by the vendor-defined acceptance criteria, whereas the other six accelerators were satisfactorily matched. The beam-matching acceptance criteria defined by the vendor are not strict enough to guarantee optimal beam-match. Deviations related to dose calculations and to beam-matched accelerators may add up. The safest and most practical way to ensure that all accelerators are within clinical acceptable accuracy is to include TPS calculations in the evaluation. Further, comparisons between measurements and calculations should be done in absolute dose terms.

[1]  Jan Hrbacek,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of a beam-matching procedure using one-dimensional gamma analysis. , 2007, Medical physics.

[2]  A. Ahnesjö,et al.  Dose calculations for external photon beams in radiotherapy. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  M Goitein,et al.  Calculation of the uncertainty in the dose delivered during radiation therapy. , 1985, Medical physics.

[4]  R. Watts,et al.  Comparative measurements on a series of accelerators by the same vendor. , 1999, Medical physics.

[5]  Helen H Liu,et al.  Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: Issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning. , 2007, Medical physics.

[6]  Michael Goitein,et al.  Nonstandard deviations: Communications , 1983 .

[7]  André Wambersie,et al.  What accuracy is required and can be achieved in radiation therapy (review of radiobiological and clinical data) , 2001 .

[8]  Tommy Knöös,et al.  Quality assurance of treatment planning systems - Practical examples for non-IMRT photon beams, ESTRO Booklet No. 7 , 2004 .

[9]  P. Andreo,et al.  Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water , 2001 .

[10]  D. G. Lewis,et al.  A DICOM-RT-based toolbox for the evaluation and verification of radiotherapy plans. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  A Wambersie,et al.  What degree of accuracy is required and can be achieved in photon and neutron therapy? , 1987, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  Robert J. Shalek,et al.  Determination of Absorbed Dose in a Patient Irradiated by Beams of X or Gamma Rays in Radiotherapy Procedures , 1977 .

[13]  B Mijnheer,et al.  Tolerances for the accuracy of photon beam dose calculations of treatment planning systems. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.