Bus Bridging Decision-Support Toolkit: Optimization Framework and Policy Analysis

Bus Bridging is the strategy most commonly applied in responding to rail service interruptions in North America and Europe. In determining the required number of buses and source routes, most transit agencies rely on ad-hoc approaches based on operational experience and constraints, which can lead to extensive delays and queue build-ups at affected stations. This thesis developed an optimization model, to determine the optimal number of shuttle buses and route allocation which minimize the overall subway and bus riders delay. The generated optimal solutions are sensitive to bus bay capacity constraints along the shuttle service corridor. The optimization model is integrated with a previously developed simulation tool that tracks the evolution of system queues and delays throughout the bus bridging process. A set of bus bridging policy guidelines were developed based on further analysis of the optimization model outputs using a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model.

[1]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Econometric Analysis of Subway User Mode Choice in Response to Unplanned Subway Disruptions , 2018 .

[2]  Matthew G. Karlaftis,et al.  The bus bridging problem in metro operations: conceptual framework, models and algorithms , 2009, Public Transp..

[3]  Amer Shalaby,et al.  Enabling large-scale transit microsimulation for disruption response support using the Nexus platform , 2017, Public Transp..

[4]  Amer Shalaby,et al.  Evaluation of bus bridging scenarios for railway service disruption management: a users’ delay modelling tool , 2020, Public Transport.

[5]  R. Noland,et al.  Travel time variability: A review of theoretical and empirical issues , 2002 .

[6]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Economic Viability of Bus Bridging Reserves for Fast Response to Unplanned Passenger Rail Disruption , 2015 .

[7]  Wei Dong,et al.  Bus Bridging Disruption in Rail Services With Frustrated and Impatient Passengers , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[8]  Erik Jenelius,et al.  Planning for the unexpected: The value of reserve capacity for public transport network robustness , 2015 .

[9]  Oliver Kramer,et al.  Genetic Algorithm Essentials , 2017, Studies in Computational Intelligence.

[10]  Amedeo R. Odoni,et al.  Optimizing Bus Bridging Services in Response to Disruptions of Urban Transit Rail Networks , 2016, Transp. Sci..

[11]  Naim Dahnoun,et al.  Studies in Computational Intelligence , 2013 .

[12]  J. Bates,et al.  The valuation of reliability for personal travel , 2001 .

[13]  Amer Shalaby,et al.  Breaking into emergency shuttle service: Aspects and impacts of retracting buses from existing scheduled bus services , 2017 .

[14]  Leo G. Kroon,et al.  Shuttle Planning for Link Closures in Urban Public Transport Networks , 2014, Transp. Sci..

[15]  Jan-Dirk Schmöcker,et al.  Metro service delay recovery : Comparison of strategies and constraints across systems , 2005 .

[16]  Chung-Horng Lung,et al.  Using genetic algorithms to find optimal solution in a search space for a cloud predictive cost-driven decision maker , 2018, Journal of Cloud Computing.

[17]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Disruption Recovery in Passenger Railways , 2013 .

[18]  Amer Shalaby,et al.  Subway Service Down Again? Assessing the Effects of Subway Service Interruptions on Local Surface Transit Performance , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[19]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Impact of Bus Depot Location on the Provision of Rail Replacement Services (Bus Bridging) , 2013 .

[20]  Doohee Nam,et al.  Estimation of Value of Travel Time Reliability , 2005 .

[21]  Oded Cats,et al.  The Robustness Value of Public Transport Development Plans , 2016 .

[22]  Ahmed M El-Geneidy,et al.  Bus Transit Service Reliability and Improvement Strategies: Integrating the Perspectives of Passengers and Transit Agencies in North America , 2015 .