A quantitative analysis of the direction-specific response of neurons in the cat's nucleus of the optic tract

SummaryAll cells in the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) of the cat, that Bcould be activated antidromically from the inferior olive, were shown to be direction-specific, as influenced by horizontal movements of an extensive visual stimulus. Cells in the left NOT were activated by leftward and inhibited by rightward movement, while those in the right NOT were activated by rightward and inhibited by leftward movement. Vertical movements did not modulate the spontaneous activity of the cells. The mean spontaneous discharge rate in 50 NOT cells was 30 spikes/s.This direction-specific response was maintained over a broad velocity range (<0.1 ° – >100 °/s). Velocities over 200 °/s could inhibit NOT cells regardless of stimulus direction.All cells in the NOT were driven by the contralateral eye, about half of them by the ipsilateral eye also. In addition, activation through the contralateral eye was stronger in most binocular units. Binocular cells preferred the same direction in the visual space through both eyes.An area approximately corresponding to the visual streak in the cat's retina projected most densely onto NOT cells. This included an extensive ipsilateral projection. No clear retinotopic order was seen. The most sensitive zone in the very large receptive fields (most diameters being >20 °) was along the horizontal zero meridian of the visual field.The retinal input to NOT cells was mediated by W-fibers.The striking similarities between the input characteristics of NOT-cells and optokinetic nystagmus are discussed. The direction selectivity and ocular dominance of the NOT system as a whole can provide a possible explanation for the directional asymmetry in the cat's optokinetic nystagmus when only one eye is stimulated.

[1]  J. Sprague,et al.  The projection of optic fibers to the visual centers in the cat , 1966, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  M. Cynader,et al.  Eye movement in strabismic cats , 1980, Nature.

[3]  B. V. Updyke,et al.  Topographic organization of the projections from cortical areas 17, 18, and 19 onto the thalamus, pretectum and superior colliculus in the cat , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Saccadic, smooth pursuit, and optokinetic eye movements of the trained cat. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  H. Collewijn Latency and gain of the rabbit's optokinetic reactions to small movements. , 1972, Brain research.

[6]  N H Barmack,et al.  Eye movements evoked by microstimulation of dorsal cap of inferior olive in the rabbit. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  H. Collewijn Direction-selective units in the rabbit's nucleus of the optic tract , 1975, Brain Research.

[8]  K. Itoh Efferent projections of the pretectum in the cat , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Retinal input to direction selective cells in the nucleus tractus opticus of the cat , 1975, Brain Research.

[10]  J. Sprague,et al.  Anatomical organization of pretectal nuclei and tectal laminae in the cat , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  N. Berman,et al.  Connections of the pretectum in the cat , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  H Collewijn,et al.  Oculomotor areas in the rabbits midbrain and pretectum. , 1975, Journal of neurobiology.

[13]  J. Stone,et al.  Properties of cat retinal ganglion cells: a comparison of W-cells with X- and Y-cells. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  E. Tauber,et al.  Optomotor Responses to Monocular Stimulation: Relation to Visual System Organization , 1968, Science.

[15]  W. Levick,et al.  Properties of rarely encountered types of ganglion cells in the cat's retina and on overall classification , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  J. Stone,et al.  Specialized Receptive Fields of the Cat's Retina , 1966, Science.

[17]  J. Stone,et al.  Properties of ganglion cells in the visual streak of the cat's retina , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  W. Precht,et al.  The role of the crossed and uncrossed retinal fibres in mediating the horizontal optokinetic nystagmus in the cat , 1980, Neuroscience Letters.

[19]  N. Mizuno,et al.  An electron microscope study of the dorsal cap of the inferior olive in the rabbit, with special reference to the pretecto-olivary fibers. , 1974, Brain research.

[20]  Professor Dr. John C. Eccles,et al.  The Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine , 1967, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[21]  R. L. Holmes Growth of the Nervous System , 1969 .

[22]  K. Hoffmann Optokinetic Nystagmus and Single-cell Responses in the Nucleus Tractus Opticus After Early Monocular Deprivation in the Cat , 1979 .

[23]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Conduction velocity in pathways from retina to superior colliculus in the cat: a correlation with receptive-field properties. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  R Fernald,et al.  An improved method for plotting retinal landmarks and focusing the eyes. , 1971, Vision research.

[25]  Toshiaki Takeda,et al.  The origin of the pretecto-olivary tract. A study using the horseradish peroxidase method , 1976, Brain Research.

[26]  J. Yamada,et al.  Descending pathways of the nucleus of the optic tract in the rat , 1979, Brain Research.

[27]  T. Powell,et al.  Interrelationships of striate and extrastriate cortex with the primary relay sites of the visual pathway. , 1968, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[28]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Continuous mapping of direction selectivity in the cat's visual cortex , 1976, Neuroscience Letters.

[29]  W. Precht,et al.  Pathways mediating optokinetic responses of vestibular nucleus neurons in the rat , 1980, Pflügers Archiv.

[30]  C. W. Oyster,et al.  Direction-selective retinal ganglion cells and control of optokinetic nystagmus in the rabbit. , 1972, Vision research.

[31]  A. Schoppmann,et al.  A direct afferent visual pathway from the nucleus of the optic tract to the inferior olive in the cat , 1976, Brain Research.

[32]  Toshiaki Takeda,et al.  Origin of descending afferents to the rostral part of dorsal cap of inferior olive which transfers contralateral optic activities to the flocculus. a horseradish peroxidase study , 1979, Brain Research.

[33]  H. Collewijn,et al.  The optokinetic reactions of the rabbit: Relation to the visual streak , 1979, Vision Research.

[34]  J. Simpson,et al.  Climbing fiber responses evoked in vestibulocerebellum of rabbit from visual system. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Wendell J. S. Krieg,et al.  The brain stem of the cat , 1969 .

[36]  J. Sprague,et al.  Corticofugal projections from the visual cortices to the thalamus, pretectum and superior colliculus in the cat , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[37]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  A comparison of visual responses in two pretectal nuclei and in the superior colliculus of the cat , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  J. Stone,et al.  Very slow-conducting ganglion cells in the cat's retina: a major, new functional type? , 1972, Brain research.

[39]  T. Powell,et al.  The projection of the retina in the cat. , 1968, Journal of anatomy.

[40]  W. Precht,et al.  Optokinetic responses of vestibular nucleus neurons in the rat , 1980, Pflügers Archiv.