Improving Return to Work Research

Background: Despite considerable multidisciplinary research on return to work (RTW), there has been only modest progress in implementation of study results, and little change in overall rates of work disability in developed countries. Methods: Thirty RTW researchers, representing over 20 institutions, assembled to review the current state of the art in RTW research, to identify promising areas for further development, and to provide direction for future investigations. Results and Conclusion: Six major themes were selected as priority areas: early risk prediction; psychosocial, behavioral and cognitive interventions; physical treatments; the challenge of implementing evidence in the workplace context; effective methods to engage multiple stakeholders; and identification of outcomes that are relevant to both RTW stakeholders and different phases of the RTW process. Understanding and preventing delayed RTW will require application of new concepts and study designs, better measures of determinants and outcomes, and more translational research. Greater stakeholder involvement and commitment, and methods to address the unique challenges of each situation are required.

[1]  P. Loisel,et al.  From Evidence to Community Practice in Work Rehabilitation: The Quebec Experience , 2003, The Clinical journal of pain.

[2]  G. Pransky,et al.  Work-related upper-extremity disorders: prospective evaluation of clinical and functional outcomes. , 1999, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[3]  S. Linton Early identification and intervention in the prevention of musculoskeletal pain. , 2002, American journal of industrial medicine.

[4]  Johannes R. Anema,et al.  A Developmental Conceptualization of Return to Work , 2005, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[5]  T. J. Sullivan,et al.  Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: challenges for future research. , 2001, American journal of industrial medicine.

[6]  G. Pransky,et al.  The Association of Medical Conditions and Presenteeism , 2004, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[7]  Raymond Baril,et al.  Workplace-Based Return-to-Work Interventions: Optimizing the Role of Stakeholders in Implementation and Research , 2005, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[8]  J. Turner,et al.  A communitywide intervention to improve outcomes and reduce disability among injured workers in Washington State. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[9]  Michelle M. Robertson,et al.  Employee Perspectives on the Role of Supervisors to Prevent Workplace Disability After Injuries , 2003, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[10]  K. Holland-Elliott Back Pain, Incapacity for Work and Social Security Benefits: An International Literature Review and Analysis. Gordon Waddell, Mansel Aylward and Philip Sawney. Published by Royal Society of Medicine Press, 2002. 368 pp. ISBN 1-85315-542-X. Price: £24.95. , 2004 .

[11]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  Rachelle Buchbinder,et al.  Prevention of Work Disability Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders: The Challenge of Implementing Evidence , 2005, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[13]  Glenn Pransky,et al.  Physical Exercise Interventions to Improve Disability and Return to Work in Low Back Pain: Current Insights and Opportunities for Improvement , 2005, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[14]  I. Scheel,et al.  Back Pain and Health Policy Research: The What, Why, How, Who, and When , 2004, Spine.

[15]  Johannes R. Anema,et al.  Return-to-Work Outcomes Following Work Disability: Stakeholder Motivations, Interests and Concerns , 2005, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[16]  G. Pransky,et al.  Prognosis and the Identification of Workers Risking Disability: Research Issues and Directions for Future Research , 2005, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[17]  R. Gatchel Musculoskeletal disorders: primary and secondary interventions. , 2004, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[18]  P. Côté,et al.  Training the Next Generation of Researchers in Work Disability Prevention: The Canadian Work Disability Prevention CIHR Strategic Training Program , 2005, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[19]  M. Sullivan,et al.  Secondary Prevention of Work Disability: Community-Based Psychosocial Intervention for Musculoskeletal Disorders , 2005, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[20]  I. Schultz,et al.  Determinants of Occupational Disability Following a Low Back Injury: A Critical Review of the Literature , 2002, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[21]  G. Pransky,et al.  Integrating Psychosocial and Behavioral Interventions to Achieve Optimal Rehabilitation Outcomes , 2005, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[22]  R. Buchbinder,et al.  2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Effects of a Media Campaign on Back Pain Beliefs and Its Potential Influence on Management of Low Back Pain in General Practice , 2001, Spine.

[23]  Jeffrey N Katz,et al.  Work-Related Outcomes in Occupational Low Back Pain: A Multidimensional Analysis , 2002, Spine.

[24]  S. Tsai,et al.  A Facilitated Early Return to Work Program at a Large Urban Medical Center , 2000, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.