An experimental investigation of the effect of nose shape on fragments penetrating GFRP

Abstract Fragments with eight different nose shapes have been used in penetration experiments into three different thicknesses (4, 9, 14 mm) of E-Glass/Phenolic glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) targets. Initial velocity, residual velocity, and ballistic limit velocities were determined for each nose shape and target thickness. These experiments revealed that the ballistic limit and energy absorbed is significantly affected by the nose shape of the fragment simulating projectiles. While all of the fragments are considered blunt nose shapes, the fragments with the sharper nose shapes were the most efficient penetrators, and the fragments presenting a flat surface at the nose were the least efficient penetrators. The experimental data is compared to two analytical approaches for estimating the ballistic limit. The first approach by Wen estimates the ballistic limit based on the nose shape of the penetrator. The second approach by Jenq et al. estimates the ballistic limit based on the difference in the impact and residual velocities when the fragment perforates the target. Wen's analytical model has excellent agreement with the fragment experimental data when fit with new empirically derived constants for each of the nose shapes. The simplified model by Jenq et al. is shown to be marginally accurate, but unconservative, method of estimating the ballistic limit.

[1]  Stephen J. Cimpoeru,et al.  A study of the effect of target thickness on the ballistic perforation of glass-fibre-reinforced plastic composites , 2000 .

[2]  Hung-Sying Jing,et al.  Predicting the ballistic limit for plain woven glass/epoxy composite laminate , 1994 .

[3]  H. M. Wen,et al.  Penetration and perforation of thick FRP laminates , 2001 .

[4]  Werner Goldsmith,et al.  The mechanics of penetration of projectiles into targets , 1978 .

[5]  A. Sabet,et al.  Effect of reinforcement type on high velocity impact response of GRP plates using a sharp tip projectile , 2011 .

[6]  Chad A. Ulven,et al.  Effect of projectile shape during ballistic perforation of VARTM carbon/epoxy composite panels , 2003 .

[7]  H. Wen,et al.  Predicting the penetration and perforation of FRP laminates struck normally by projectiles with different nose shapes , 2000 .

[8]  Gabi Ben-Dor,et al.  Optimal nose geometry of the impactor against FRP laminates , 2002 .

[9]  Clay Naito,et al.  Calculating fragment impact velocity from penetration data , 2010 .

[10]  N. K. Naik,et al.  Ballistic impact behaviour of thick composites: Parametric studies , 2008 .

[11]  Joseph B. Jordan,et al.  Quasi-static, low-velocity impact and ballistic impact behavior of plain weave E-glass/phenolic composites , 2014 .

[12]  Vincent B. C. Tan,et al.  Perforation of high-strength fabric by projectiles of different geometry , 2003 .

[13]  Uday K. Vaidya,et al.  Multi-site impact response of S2-glass/epoxy composite laminates , 2009 .